Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Structural Dynamics Control 2012, TME146
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2013-01-04 - 2013-01-23 Antal svar: 8 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 42% Kontaktperson: Viktor Berbyuk» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp
1. Which master program do you follow?8 svarande
MPAME» | | 6 | | 75% |
MPSOV» | | 1 | | 12% |
ERASMUS» | | 1 | | 12% |
Others» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.37
Your own effort2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.8 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 4 | | 50% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 4 | | 50% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.5 - 0» (At most 15 hours/week)
3. How many hours per week did you spend on the project?The question refers to the both Computer Assignments (parts 1-3) and Lab 1 and Lab 2 in the Vibrations and Smart Structure Lab.8 svarande
At most 5 hours/week» | | 3 | | 37% |
Around 10 hours/week» | | 2 | | 25% |
Around 15 hours/week» | | 3 | | 37% |
At least 20 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 4. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 8 svarande
0%» | | 1 | | 12% |
25%» | | 2 | | 25% |
50%» | | 2 | | 25% |
75%» | | 2 | | 25% |
100%» | | 1 | | 12% |
Genomsnitt: 3
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.5. How understandable are the course goals?8 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 3 | | 37% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 2 | | 25% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 3 | | 37% |
Genomsnitt: 2.62 6. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?5 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 1 | | 20% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 4 | | 80% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.8 - More could be included.» (No, the goals are set too low)
7. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?6 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 2 | | 33% |
Yes, definitely» | | 2 | | 33% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 2 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - It did test what was presented in the class.» (Yes, definitely)
Teaching and course administration8. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?8 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 12% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 50% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 37% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.25 9. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?8 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 25% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 12% |
Large extent» | | 4 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 12% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?8 svarande
Very badly» | | 1 | | 12% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 5 | | 62% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3 11. What is your opinion of the course textbook "Structural Dynamics and Control", 2012?7 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 6 | | 85% |
Very good» | | 1 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 3.14 12. Was the course literature worth its price?- Yes»
- Don"t remember the price»
- Yes»
- yes»
13. What is your opinion of the lectures?8 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather bad» | | 1 | | 16% |
Rather good» | | 5 | | 83% |
Very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.83 14. What is your opinion of the problem solving sessions?8 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 3 | | 75% |
Very good» | | 1 | | 25% |
No opinion» | | 4 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.25 15. What is your opinion of the computer assignments (Parts 1-3)?8 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather bad» | | 1 | | 16% |
Rather good» | | 4 | | 66% |
Very good» | | 1 | | 16% |
No opinion» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3 - Some unclear questions on Part 2 for example.» (Rather bad)
16. What is your opinion of the labs with test riggs at the Vibrations and Smart Structures Lab?8 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather bad» | | 2 | | 28% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 28% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 42% |
No opinion» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.14 - Would be better to have it after part 3 project maybe, so that everyone really knows what they are doing.» (Rather bad)
17. How do you rate the efforts of the course assistants?- Good»
- Well»
- They where very helpful»
- Not that good.»
- Very helpful »
18. What is your opinion of the guest lecture on LabView?8 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather bad» | | 1 | | 14% |
Rather good» | | 6 | | 85% |
Very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.85 - But didn"t give that much in my opinion, include it more or exclude it.» (Rather good)
19. Was the English proficiency of the teachers satisfactory?8 svarande
Yes» | | 7 | | 87% |
Partly» | | 1 | | 12% |
No» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.12
Study climate20. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?8 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 3 | | 37% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 37% |
I did not seek help» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.87 - But the assistants didn"t answer emails, one didn"t at least. That was odd.» (Rather good)
21. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?8 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 25% |
Very well» | | 6 | | 75% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.75 22. How was the course workload?8 svarande
Too low» | | 1 | | 12% |
Low» | | 1 | | 12% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 62% |
High» | | 1 | | 12% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.75 23. How was the total workload this study period?8 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 50% |
High» | | 4 | | 50% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5
Summarizing questions24. What is your general impression of the course?8 svarande
Poor» | | 1 | | 12% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 12% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 6 | | 75% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.37 25. Are you interested in the system that you can pass the SDC course by doing the computer assignments and labs without doing the exam?8 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather bad» | | 2 | | 33% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 16% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 50% |
No opinion» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.16 - Stydents must calculate some by had too!» (Rather bad)
26. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Assignments»
- Assignments»
- Exam»
27. What should definitely be changed to next year?- It would be nice to have a more organized handouts on the course web page, eg with subfolders. It was a bit messy. And also give the cover pages in pdf, not docx.»
- Update the lab PM.»
28. Additional comments
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|