ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Production Logistics HT2012, TEK240, HT2012

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-01-03 - 2013-02-03
Antal svar: 17
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Sara Algestam»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»6 37%
At most 20 hours/week»7 43%
At most 25 hours/week»1 6%
At most 30 hours/week»2 12%
At most 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.93

- read the all book take a lot of time» (At most 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 6%
50%»3 18%
75%»10 62%
100%»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

3. How understandable are the course goals?

16 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 12%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 6%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 37%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 43%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- Lecture slides could be more precise in what is important and what is not.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»15 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination asses whether you have reached the goals?

16 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 37%
Yes, definitely»10 62%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

6. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»6 37%
Large extent»8 50%
Great extent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.56

7. To what extent has the lectures been of help of your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»2 12%
Some extent»9 56%
Large extent»2 12%
Great extent»3 18%
Did not attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

- Lectures could be more lively and on point. » (Some extent)
- If I would done some pre-reading before the lectures then I think i would choose "large extent". » (Some extent)
- The quality of the lectures had large variations. » (Some extent)

8. To what extent has the exercises been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»2 12%
Large extent»5 31%
Great extent»8 50%
Did not attend»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

9. To what extent has the case project been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»3 18%
Large extent»9 56%
Great extent»3 18%
Did not participate»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»3 18%
Rather well»8 50%
Very well»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- Would be better to use Ping Pong as in most other courses. » (Rather badly)
- Power point presentations could be uploaded before the class to allow to take notes.» (Rather well)
- It is very nice that you keep everything at the same place, but if you choose not to use timeedit then you should make an exportable calendar version as iCal or similar. Me and many students simply add the this type of schedules to our google calendars, phones etc. This was confusing since timeedit normally matches the lecture schedules quite good, but this wasn"t the case in this course...» (Rather well)

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

16 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 31%
Very good»10 62%
I did not seek help»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

12. How was the course workload?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 6%
Adequate»11 68%
High»4 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

13. To what extent have the guest lecture by Fredrik Helgesson from Nobel Biocare helped you understand the subject?

16 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»6 37%
Large extent»5 31%
Great extent»2 12%
Did not attend»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- I left after the first hour! Maybe the guest lectures should be compulsory :)» (Some extent)

14. To what extent have the guest lecture by Roger Lindau from Swenox helped you understand the subject?

16 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 31%
Large extent»5 31%
Great extent»1 6%
Did not attend»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- I left after the first hour! Maybe the guest lectures should be compulsory :)» (Some extent)

15. To what extent have the guest lecture by Åsa Hedendal from Akzo Nobel helped you understand the subject?

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»8 57%
Large extent»6 42%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- I didn"t attend this one.» (?)

16. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 6%
Adequate»8 50%
Good»7 43%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- The lectures were a bit dull, at that showed in the attendance!» (Adequate)

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The excercise lectures!»
- Exercises were really good, and the case. »
- Exercise lessons are useful and interesting, as well as industry lectures»
- Case and guest lectures»
- the exercice session »
- the exercices and the case project»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The emphasis on the book - I know we are adults but you should put higher emphasis on how important it is to read the book since it really helps you understand the course subject. »
- More smaller cases or some handins of exercises. Better lectures!»
- I think the project is not very useful for the course.»
- The lecture slides»
- the method of giving the lectures (more dynamic)»

19. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från