Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
SP1-2_12/13_Construction governance, BOM011
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-01-24 Antal svar: 16 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 32% Kontaktperson: Christina Larsson»
1. One question about the course in general*Estimate to what extent, on a scale from 1- 5 , you share the opinion of this statement, where 1 means that you do NOT AT ALL agree with the statement 5 means that you COMPLETELY agree with the statement
Matrisfråga The general impression is that the course was very good* 16 svarande
1» | | 3 | | 18% |
2» | | 4 | | 25% |
3» | | 1 | | 6% |
4» | | 6 | | 37% |
5» | | 2 | | 12% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 2. Five questions about the courseEstimate to what extent, on a scale from 1- 5 , you share the opinion of these statements, where 1 means that you do NOT AT ALL agree with the statement 5 means that you COMPLETELY agree with the statement
Matrisfråga - Administration can be more well-organized.»
- Lack of clear information of some cancelled and moved lectures»
- The administration of the course have been very bad because there has not been any thread through the course and even though it came out what to study for the exam it felt as we had the last summerizing lecture just because People in the class emailed the teacher that we did not know what the main focus on the course was..»
- very good work, but it is good if you make one course with PM.»
- very unstructured course, no "red line" during the course.
»
- Very bad communication to the students. Too many different guest lectures that made it hard to know what the course was about.»
- Didn"t see any goals at any time.»
It was clear to me what the learning outcomes of the course were 16 svarande
1» | | 4 | | 25% |
2» | | 2 | | 12% |
3» | | 4 | | 25% |
4» | | 1 | | 6% |
5» | | 5 | | 31% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.06 The examination and the aims of the course were well related 16 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 5 | | 33% |
3» | | 2 | | 13% |
4» | | 4 | | 26% |
5» | | 4 | | 26% |
I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.46 The course was very well administered 16 svarande
1» | | 5 | | 31% |
2» | | 4 | | 25% |
3» | | 4 | | 25% |
4» | | 1 | | 6% |
5» | | 2 | | 12% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.43 I felt that the course had a high degree of significance for my education 16 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 7 | | 43% |
4» | | 5 | | 31% |
5» | | 4 | | 25% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.81 The course demanded a high degree of work effort 16 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 2 | | 12% |
3» | | 8 | | 50% |
4» | | 5 | | 31% |
5» | | 1 | | 6% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.31 3. What elements of the course should definitely remain?- Guest lectures, Basic concepts, Summary writing»
- The guest lectures»
- almost ok»
- Liveproject»
- The three written assignments and the exam. »
- -»
- Lectures»
- The guest lectures were mostly very interesting.»
- The group-assignment about a self-chosen topic were really good (including the presentation).»
- materials of the last lecture by Olander»
4. Were there any elements missing in the course?- Some guest lectures were skipped.»
- books»
- A red thread. A theme of some sort that would make the course eaisier to follow.»
- Seminars. Clearer structure»
- No, not that I can come up with.»
- You can not have a course with all elements that is needed»
5. What, if anything, do you think should be changed in the course?- Assignment 2 could have been done in quarter 2.»
- no comment»
- Remove the guest lectures or make them more connected to the other lectures.
The course administration was very bad. It was hard to get answer on questions. »
- We never had any feedback on hand-ins and the project work, except from general comments for the class as a whole. That is really poor. »
- Better administration with better communication between teachers and students. »
- Not have as many different guest lecturers.»
- Göran should not be administrating the course. Very low degree of information were given. He is though good at being a lecturer. »
- Kursen bör bara sträcka sig över en halv läsperiod. Detta för att kursen idag kändes långdragen och helhetsbilden av "varför" vi läser kursen tappades bort då den blev så långdragen. »
6. Which parts/elements of the course were the most important for your learning outcome?If there is anything missing in the list below, please let us know! (Comments)Matrisfråga - the course is very good
thanks»
- We haven"t got our results from the exam yet, which we were promised to get at latest 5th Jan. Today, that is one week ago. »
- Very little feedback on both hand-ins and project. How are we supposed to learn anything from this work if we don"t know what we could have done better.»
Lectures 16 svarande
-» | | 1 | | 6% |
OK» | | 3 | | 18% |
+» | | 6 | | 37% |
++» | | 6 | | 37% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.06 Exercises 16 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 4 | | 44% |
+» | | 2 | | 22% |
++» | | 3 | | 33% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 7 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.88 Workshops 16 svarande
-» | | 2 | | 33% |
OK» | | 0 | | 0% |
+» | | 1 | | 16% |
++» | | 3 | | 50% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 10 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.83 Project work 16 svarande
-» | | 1 | | 6% |
OK» | | 5 | | 31% |
+» | | 6 | | 37% |
++» | | 4 | | 25% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.81 Ask questions 16 svarande
-» | | 2 | | 14% |
OK» | | 7 | | 50% |
+» | | 3 | | 21% |
++» | | 2 | | 14% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.35 Hand -ins 16 svarande
-» | | 2 | | 12% |
OK» | | 5 | | 31% |
+» | | 7 | | 43% |
++» | | 2 | | 12% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.56 Examination 16 svarande
-» | | 1 | | 6% |
OK» | | 3 | | 18% |
+» | | 9 | | 56% |
++» | | 3 | | 18% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.87 Team work 16 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 5 | | 33% |
+» | | 5 | | 33% |
++» | | 5 | | 33% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3 Independent work 16 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 5 | | 33% |
+» | | 4 | | 26% |
++» | | 6 | | 40% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.06 Occasions with critique (feedback) 16 svarande
-» | | 4 | | 36% |
OK» | | 4 | | 36% |
+» | | 2 | | 18% |
++» | | 1 | | 9% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 5 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2 Guest lectures 16 svarande
-» | | 2 | | 12% |
OK» | | 1 | | 6% |
+» | | 5 | | 31% |
++» | | 8 | | 50% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.18 External study visits 16 svarande
-» | | 1 | | 14% |
OK» | | 2 | | 28% |
+» | | 2 | | 28% |
++» | | 2 | | 28% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 9 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.71 Other element 14 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 1 | | 50% |
+» | | 1 | | 50% |
++» | | 0 | | 0% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 12 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.5* obligatoriska frågor
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|