Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
SP2_12/13_Financial and Management Accounting, LBT431
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-01-24 Antal svar: 17 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 28% Kontaktperson: Christina Larsson»
1. Which programme do you belong to?*17 svarande
International Project Management» | | 6 | | 35% |
Design and Construction Project Management» | | 8 | | 47% |
Erasmus student or else» | | 3 | | 17% |
Genomsnitt: 1.82 2. One question about the course in general*Estimate to what extent, on a scale from 1- 5 , you share the opinion of this statement, where 1 means that you do NOT AT ALL agree with the statement 5 means that you COMPLETELY agree with the statement
Matrisfråga The general impression is that the course was very good* 17 svarande
1» | | 1 | | 5% |
2» | | 1 | | 5% |
3» | | 5 | | 29% |
4» | | 7 | | 41% |
5» | | 3 | | 17% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.58 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 3. Five questions about the courseEstimate to what extent, on a scale from 1- 5 , you share the opinion of these statements, where 1 means that you do NOT AT ALL agree with the statement 5 means that you COMPLETELY agree with the statement
Matrisfråga - really important course»
- Too much writing at the exam!!!»
- The examination didnt reflect the course, if think the cours and the lectures could have been more like the workshop and the exam.»
- There is a big conflict in this course because the course is accounting management but in the exam we have to evaluate and analyse some projects that they are not related to the course.Also evaluation and analysis need to take more times.It is clearly that there are differences between evaluations. »
It was clear to me what the learning outcomes of the course were 17 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 2 | | 11% |
3» | | 4 | | 23% |
4» | | 8 | | 47% |
5» | | 3 | | 17% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.7 The examination and the aims of the course were well related 17 svarande
1» | | 2 | | 11% |
2» | | 5 | | 29% |
3» | | 2 | | 11% |
4» | | 7 | | 41% |
5» | | 1 | | 5% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3 The course was very well administered 17 svarande
1» | | 2 | | 11% |
2» | | 1 | | 5% |
3» | | 4 | | 23% |
4» | | 6 | | 35% |
5» | | 4 | | 23% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.52 I felt that the course had a high degree of significance for my education 17 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 4 | | 23% |
3» | | 2 | | 11% |
4» | | 6 | | 35% |
5» | | 5 | | 29% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.7 The course demanded a high degree of work effort 17 svarande
1» | | 2 | | 11% |
2» | | 1 | | 5% |
3» | | 4 | | 23% |
4» | | 7 | | 41% |
5» | | 3 | | 17% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.47 4. What elements of the course should definitely remain?- Peer review, benchmarking, assessment, feedback report and presentation.»
- The workshop»
- project simulation»
- Simulation workshop»
- the workshops»
- The workshop with Phil Thomas and the cases after each lecture.»
- Calculations
Workshop»
- The workshop was good and also good that it was both financial och management accounting.»
- The workshop with Phil Thomas»
- The exercise part.»
- Case studies, "calculation cottage" hehe»
- the workshop»
- Balance score card exercise »
5. Were there any elements missing in the course?- more solved exercises»
- No»
- No»
- Even more calculations»
- None»
- No idea.»
- no»
- The course didn"t focus on the accounting management. »
6. What, if anything, do you think should be changed in the course?- May be the questionnaires should be evaluated thoroughly by the class.»
- two project simulation workshops instead of one.»
- Nothing to change»
- The written exam was not good, it was not related to the time we had to write the exam.»
- Exercise more cases.»
- The exam was to easy. Afterwards we all looked confused at each other and wondered if the two first questions really could be as simple as we thought.. »
- Evaluation and analysis are related to the other course.»
7. Which parts/elements of the course were the most important for your learning outcome?If there is anything missing in the list below, please let us know! (Comments)Matrisfråga - What did we have any external study vistits??? »
- The workshop with Phil Thomas at the end was a great experience. However, we all felt that it should have been in the beginning of the course and not days away from our first exam of the period.»
Lectures 17 svarande
-» | | 2 | | 12% |
OK» | | 4 | | 25% |
+» | | 7 | | 43% |
++» | | 3 | | 18% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.68 Exercises 17 svarande
-» | | 2 | | 11% |
OK» | | 5 | | 29% |
+» | | 5 | | 29% |
++» | | 5 | | 29% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.76 Workshops 17 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 1 | | 6% |
+» | | 6 | | 37% |
++» | | 9 | | 56% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 Project work 17 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 1 | | 11% |
+» | | 3 | | 33% |
++» | | 5 | | 55% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 8 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.44 Ask questions 17 svarande
-» | | 1 | | 6% |
OK» | | 4 | | 26% |
+» | | 6 | | 40% |
++» | | 4 | | 26% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.86 Hand -ins 17 svarande
-» | | 2 | | 15% |
OK» | | 3 | | 23% |
+» | | 4 | | 30% |
++» | | 4 | | 30% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 4 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.76 Examination 17 svarande
-» | | 6 | | 35% |
OK» | | 3 | | 17% |
+» | | 6 | | 35% |
++» | | 2 | | 11% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.23 Team work 17 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 6 | | 35% |
+» | | 5 | | 29% |
++» | | 6 | | 35% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3 Independent work 17 svarande
-» | | 1 | | 5% |
OK» | | 6 | | 35% |
+» | | 5 | | 29% |
++» | | 5 | | 29% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.82 Occasions with critique (feedback) 17 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 3 | | 33% |
+» | | 5 | | 55% |
++» | | 1 | | 11% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 8 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.77 Guest lectures 17 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 3 | | 33% |
+» | | 4 | | 44% |
++» | | 2 | | 22% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 8 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.88 External study visits 17 svarande
-» | | 1 | | 16% |
OK» | | 4 | | 66% |
+» | | 0 | | 0% |
++» | | 1 | | 16% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 11 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.16 Other element 14 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 2 | | 66% |
+» | | 1 | | 33% |
++» | | 0 | | 0% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 11 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.33 Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.58
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.58 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.64* obligatoriska frågor
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|