Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

HT12 lp2 FFY630 Fuel cells - function and materials, FFY630

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-01-22
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Bengt-Erik Mellander»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»6 66%
Around 20 hours/week»3 33%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»1 11%
25%»1 11%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 33%
100%»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

- I was unable to attend for other reasons» (25%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 22%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 22%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 55%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 71%
Yes, definitely»2 28%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»2 22%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»5 55%
Great extent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- only went for few lectures» (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 44%
Large extent»3 33%
Great extent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- Was my major guide» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 25%
Rather well»2 25%
Very well»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 11%
Very good»6 66%
I did not seek help»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 4.11

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 33%
Very well»4 44%
I did not seek cooperation»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

11. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 11%
Adequate»8 88%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- If one wanted to read the books one could fil 7 weeks. If one didnt then it was still ok» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 28%
Adequate»3 42%
High»2 28%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- only had this course» (Low)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 22%
Good»5 55%
Excellent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- A fun course with inspiring lectures and demonstrations of fuel cells.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The labs and teachers»
- home exam and practical demonstrations»
- Laboratory session»
- The "physical" teaching, such as the bicycle and car.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The lab-equipment to the PEM-Stack. Didnt function properly and that is of uttermost importance for the credabiblity of the lab session»
- I suggest that the assignments could be done hand-writing instead of typed report. As long as hand-writing, it will be good enough. »
- The information regarding examination was confusing to me. How the total points were distributed over assignments, exam and project was not clear. Also it would have been nice to have received the corrected assignments before the exams with more comments in order to learn more.»
- Correcting the assignments faster! They should definitely be corrected before the handin of the next assignment.»

16. Additional comments

- vewry nice course !»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75

Kursutvärderingssystem från