|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPCOM 1213-2 Applied signal processing SSY130Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-02-03 Antal svar: 67 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 56% Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.67 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.35 - Think about 20 is a good average. Some weeks were closer to 30. Did not attend studio sessions and only 50% of exercises.» (Around 20 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?66 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.56 - Most lectures. Exercises felt too simple (and slow) for the course.» (75%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?66 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.93 - As always: I take a look on them in the beginning of the course, then forget about them.
It is hard to understand the goals before you know anything about the subject of the course. The course goals could be highlighted as you progress by the course.» (I have not seen/read the goals) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.53 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.11 - I was from Applied Mechanics and had no probleme.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?57 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.66 - There was a question which I feel was more directed at those taking a basic signal processing course, which was enough for me to pass the exam, given my grade in my grades in the projects and hand ins. I simply don"t understand why question 2 on the exam was on that paper...» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?67 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.83 - Very very small part» (Small extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?67 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.52 - Didnt buy it» (Small extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?67 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.28 - the handouts based on the course lectures were a large part of my learning. although the time for feedback/grading of the hand in problems and the projects were way out of line.» (Very badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?67 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.19 - We asked question but the were never answered.» (Very poor) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?67 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.7 - We were not allowed to cooperate for the individual hand-ins, which felt weird.» (Rather well) 11. How was the course workload?66 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.01 - More hand ins and more useful tutorials» (Low) 12. How was the total workload this study period?66 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.18 - Lots of hand ins, but not so much pressure for the exams.» (Adequate) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?67 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.85 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - The project and assignment is too heavy. However, the tutorial and lectures are not related tightly with such assignment and project.» (Adequate) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Projects.»- The grading system. If you work hard during the quarter (projects and home exercises), you practically pass the course. I like this method.» - the teaching in class...It was very comprehensive» - The projects were nice, although too much was given, in my opinion» - Project works.» - projects and tutorials» - Projects are good, worth the time.» - The projects. Working with the DSP.» - Nothing» - The point system» - The projects are really good.» - The handouts» - project» - E-Studio Sessions» - This kind of learing is good with handins and projects» - The open lab was a good way to explore the theory. » - the oral exams helped a lot» - Projects in their current forum» - Projects and hand-ins as they"re excellent tools for learning.» - the hand ins» - I liked the "Adaptive Filter-Project". I like the fact that you actually can hear when your algorithm works.» - The projects.» - The laborations» - The project works which are really interesting» - The material. » - the projects» - The lab sessions.» - Everything» - Laboration but I would have liked it more if we had some lab assistant in the lab at some specific time during the time we do the measurements so that we can be guided or given some suggestions » - Tomas McKelvey» - Most of it, but it is very demanding» - The lectures, labs and HIPs.» - The lab sessions, the extra home assignments.» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Exercises could be more challenging, to get you learning things for exam earlier.»- To have more exercises and problems (studio sessions) would be better. » - The points the reports get should be higher....the passing point should change to 50 and the reports should have equivalent value with the oral exam.» - Scheduled computer sessions not really necessary. Could be done at home. » - Felt like the lectures could be improved a little bit - nothing serious just would have liked a somewhat "firmer" lectures. » - More useful tutorials, I didn"t learn anything that was closely related to the course material. The first one was on the z transform, the third on the probability theory.... I didn"t need that at all...» - maybe explaining more what are the expectations od the oral exam» - HIP 1-3: Would learn alot more if I was allowed to work in groups of 2-3 students. Dialog among fellow students should not be something bad.» - It would also be good if the format of the hand-ins could be changed from paper to e-mail.» - The one who gives the lecture.» - Courses and tutorials should be more concentrated on understanding.» - Either project or hand-ins, not both of them» - tutoril can be associate with the lecture contents. lecture slide should be handed out before the class.» - Project,and the oral examination of the project» - The last project should not be so close to the week of examins since you don"t have time to concentrate on the examins. It should be easier to get help. » - Clearer instructions on what is requested from the project reports» - Ingemar Andersson! And his way of answering questions. More tutorials.» - the time for grading/feedback of the hand in problems and the projects.» - Reduce the number of reports that should be handed in.» - It would be useful with more comments on the corrected home assignments. It"s hard to know what your error is if you only get the number of points.» - More explanations about the project and more help in order to it better. Not that much work alone, because the solutions of them are not so strightforward. I don‘,t think the tutorial sessions are so necessary. Maybe if they were more correlated with the teory it could be better.» - How long time the students have to solve the exercises (need more time)» - Less hand-in assignments. » - Nothing, maybe no book.» - Grading in the projects should be more transparent.No reason was given for missing points in the project reports.» - The OFDM projects first part is rather hard to understand since some people have not even heard what it is and its quite hard to understand how it works and what it"s about from the theory part of the instructions » - Time for questions in thefirst project, extra songs in the lab» 16. Additional comments- The oral examinations consists of too large amount of points, and the hand-in"s too small. »- I felt the grading for the project reports and oral exams were not entirely fair. Our group got as good score as friends groups, but I got a good impression that they performed better on the exams and wrote better reports. We were not a full group, so maybe the grading was nicer, but tasted bittersweet, nevertheless.» - The Lecture notes are very well structured and highly usefull but they often contain spelling errors. » - Nothing.» - I got a negative impression of this course because of it felt like nobody wanted to learn us anything. We just kept on working and working and when we asked questions nobody wanted or were willing to explain anything.» - I think the rules about the home assignments are strange. The way they are formulated now it seems like it"s not allowed to discuss the problems at all with other students and I think this lowers the learning value. In most other courses students are encouraged to work together with home assignments.» - You should get closer to the divisions of Vehicle Safety and Vehicle Engineering and Autonomous Systems. With the development of active and integrated safety, mechanical eng. need to get stronger in signal processing and this course perfectly fits this purpose. That"s why I took it. » - Students without a signal processing background should are not given the chance to work with exam level exercises and it is difficult for them to achieve high exam scores.A set of such exercise should be handed out so students can work on it on their one and ask questions to some assistant or professor» Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.85 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.71
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4%