Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

12lp2-Course evaluation: TEK150 Integrated Product Development

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-01-20
Antal svar: 29
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 74%
Kontaktperson: Jamal Nasir»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

29 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»8 27%
Around 20 hours/week»14 48%
Around 25 hours/week»4 13%
Around 30 hours/week»2 6%
At least 35 hours/week»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- DfQ course took most the time» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

29 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 3%
50%»2 6%
75%»14 48%
100%»12 41%

Genomsnitt: 4.27

- Missed only due to other urgent obligations, would have liked to take part in 100%.» (75%)
- Did not attend literature seminars. Could be good if these were mandatory.» (75%)
- The lecture times at fridays did not fit in my personal time schedule » (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

27 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 3%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 11%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»23 85%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- Usually dont pay that much attention to the course goals» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- Perhaps the best course yet in terms of clarifying goals and putting lectures in the context of these goals.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

28 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»28 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

27 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»8 29%
Yes, definitely»11 40%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»8 29%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Yes, very much. The goals did very clearly relate to the course content.» (?)
- Very standardized exam, but I learnt a lot during the course, so can"t really say that it"s a bad thing.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

29 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»7 24%
Large extent»16 55%
Great extent»6 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.96

- Especially the literature seminars.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent lecture(s) from following teachers contributed to your learning?


- Both Magnus and Annika was way under the wished quality»
- The content presented by Annika was already covered in a previous course (TEK145) which made it a bit unnecessary but she presented it really well.»

Lars Trygg
29 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 3%
Large extent»7 24%
Great extent»21 72%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.68

Magnus Persson
28 svarande

Small extent»7 30%
Some extent»6 26%
Large extent»8 34%
Great extent»2 8%
No opinion»5

Genomsnitt: 2.21

Martin Karlsson
27 svarande

Small extent»6 31%
Some extent»4 21%
Large extent»7 36%
Great extent»2 10%
No opinion»8

Genomsnitt: 2.26

Ludvig Lindlöf
28 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 16%
Large extent»8 33%
Great extent»12 50%
No opinion»4

Genomsnitt: 3.33

Annika Ambjörnsson
28 svarande

Small extent»12 54%
Some extent»8 36%
Large extent»2 9%
Great extent»0 0%
No opinion»6

Genomsnitt: 1.54

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

29 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»6 20%
Large extent»11 37%
Great extent»12 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- Not as much without the literature review sessions which were really good. Other teachers should benchmark these review sessions.» (Large extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

29 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 6%
Rather well»18 62%
Very well»9 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.24

- Pingpong såg ju ut some ett bombnedslag av dokument. Inga namn på föreläsningarna, bara datum.» (Rather badly)
- One handout was not covered in the PM.» (Rather well)
- Would be nice if handouts were available before lectures. Perhaps some slides with answers to group discussions etc could be hidden?» (Rather well)

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

29 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»9 31%
Very good»19 65%
I did not seek help»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- Good response on phone and email» (Very good)

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

29 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 6%
Rather well»11 37%
Very well»16 55%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.48

- Please let us choose our own groups!» (Rather poorly)
- Hard to work in a group with students from so many backgrounds. Hence, only Swedish students in my group.» (Rather well)

12. How was the course workload?

28 svarande

Too low»1 3%
Low»1 3%
Adequate»17 60%
High»8 28%
Too high»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- We put a lot of effort in our topic report, I know of other groups that pretty much finished theirs in one-two days. So in general it"s between low-high probably.» (High)
- The group tasks took too much time.» (High)
- Because of the group.» (Too high)

13. How was the total workload this study period?

29 svarande

Too low»1 3%
Low»1 3%
Adequate»7 24%
High»19 65%
Too high»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- Four group tasks in total is too much in one period.» (High)
- Groups.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

29 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 3%
Adequate»2 6%
Good»18 62%
Excellent»8 27%

Genomsnitt: 4.13 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Kept lectures at a minimum but really good content, efficient deliveries.» (Excellent)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The development games. Ludwigshafen lecture was good. Applied lecture by Lars was really good!»
- Practical exercises, lean design and DFA.»
- DFA lab and the lean development game»
- Everything»
- The different "experiments" or games. They were fun and I learned a lot from them. That we can chose the topics for the topic report our selfs, it made it more interesting than it would have been to bee given one.»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Individual Applied materials case solutions.define what is expected from the topic report more clearly. Triathlon lecture didn"t give much in terms of related subject. Annikas lecture was good but loosely tied, perhaps this can be improved.»
- more opportunities for reviews on the topic reports...maybe not just with Lars, but also with fellow students. »
- Earlier deadline for the topic report and its presentation»
- some more practical»
- Better introduction to the topic report, it was very vague and that made it very difficult to start. »

17. Additional comments

- Good course that very good impression of this course, and I have been critical in many other course evaluations.»
- I realy enjoyed the course Thank you Lars!»
- nope...»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.13

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.13
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.78

Kursutvärderingssystem från