Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
RRY125 Modern astrophysics
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-01-21 Antal svar: 8 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 47% Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.8 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 3 | | 37% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 3 | | 37% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 1 | | 12% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 1 | | 12% |
Genomsnitt: 2.12 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 8 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 1 | | 12% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 1 | | 12% |
100%» | | 6 | | 75% |
Genomsnitt: 4.5 - Beacuse I was ill I missed more than I wanted to. Might go to the lectures next year, just because they are interesting even if I pass the exam.» (25%)
- allmost» (100%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?8 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 1 | | 12% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 7 | | 87% |
Genomsnitt: 3.87 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.8 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 8 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?8 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, definitely» | | 5 | | 62% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 3 | | 37% |
Genomsnitt: 3.37
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?8 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 12% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 62% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.12 - The lectures av very brief, it is hard to know what to focus on when reading the book. » (Some extent)
7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?8 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 25% |
Great extent» | | 6 | | 75% |
Genomsnitt: 3.75 - The course litterature has been very helpful. » (Great extent)
- Read the intire book, its a great one!» (Great extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?8 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 25% |
Very well» | | 6 | | 75% |
Genomsnitt: 3.75 - Still haven"t been registred by course admin...» (Rather well)
9. What is your opinion about the visit to Onsala Space Observatory?Choose all answers you agree with below!
8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
Interesting» | | 8 | | 100% |
Not interesting» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too short» | | 1 | | 12% |
Adequate time» | | 3 | | 37% |
Too long» | | 0 | | 0% |
- I think it was very nice to visit Onsala. It would have been nice to do something similar but with optical telescopes.» (Interesting)
- The Onsala-visit was extremely inspiring! More of that!» (Interesting, Too short)
- Would have been great to actually see the telescopes being used.» (Interesting, Adequate time)
10. What is your opinion about the observational exercise with SALSA?Choose all answers you agree with below!
8 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
Not useful, I learned only little from it» | | 1 | | 12% |
Useful, I learned much from it» | | 4 | | 50% |
Very useful, I learned very much from it» | | 2 | | 25% |
I had practical problems (please specify below)» | | 4 | | 50% |
I had no practical problems» | | 1 | | 12% |
The instructions were adequate» | | 4 | | 50% |
I would have liked more detailed instructions» | | 1 | | 12% |
- Salsa did not work on one day for unknown reasons. But this was not a big problem.» (Useful, I learned much from it, I had practical problems (please specify below), The instructions were adequate)
- This was a nice and instructive exercise. Should definitely be remained in the course. » (Useful, I learned much from it)
- Hard to download the data to my computer. » (I had practical problems (please specify below), I would have liked more detailed instructions)
- The program QRadio cut the link for no reason once and it also cut the link when I accidently choose galactic coordinates which gave a negative angle with the horizon. Then I had to contact the administrator because the program is designed so that one remains logged in when the link has been broken and no one can therefore log in again (including one self!). This should be changed. One should not be able to choose non-valid coordinates by accident. » (Very useful, I learned very much from it, I had practical problems (please specify below), The instructions were adequate)
- The first time we measured there were problems with brage and we did not get a usable signal but the second time everything went well.» (Useful, I learned much from it, I had practical problems (please specify below), The instructions were adequate)
Study climate11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?8 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very good» | | 6 | | 75% |
I did not seek help» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 4.25 - Should have with the SALSA-prolbems..» (I did not seek help)
12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?8 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 25% |
Very well» | | 1 | | 12% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 5 | | 62% |
Genomsnitt: 4.37 - Would have been mor fun if I did I think» (I did not seek cooperation)
13. How was the course workload?8 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 12% |
Adequate» | | 7 | | 87% |
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.87 - A lot to read, but it didn"t feel as much since it was extremely fun reading.» (Low)
14. How was the total workload this study period?8 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 12% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 50% |
High» | | 1 | | 12% |
Too high» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - But this was my own fault because I only took one course.» (Low)
- Another course was taking most of the time..» (Too high)
Summarizing questions15. What is your general impression of the course?8 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 3 | | 37% |
Excellent» | | 5 | | 62% |
Genomsnitt: 4.62 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - An overview of the universe would have been nice in the beginning. But the whole course was kind of an overview so that might be difficult. All in all a really good course with really nice and helpful teachers!» (Good)
- Eskil is really good! He really explained very well. So he receives 4.5/5. To receive 5, maybe he could just give his notes during the exercises so the students maybe could listen and see how he solves. I think many students focuses more to write correct. Anyway he did a perfect job!
Magnus and Susanne, did aswell as Eskil really good job. They explained really good.» (Excellent)
- This should be available during the first 3 years as well for those who wish to study astronomy. I will recomend it for younger physics students as one of the optional courses in the third year. » (Excellent)
16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Number of exercises. Maybe include bonus points for the exam. Student could maybe receive assignments for every 3 chapters. And how well we do from the assignment could give us the amount of bonus points. »
- The mix of everything, the Onsala-visit and the laboration. Great!»
- The lab and the text book.»
- SALSA lab, visit to OSO»
17. What should definitely be changed to next year?- ...»
- A little more specific about what to focus on. The book is very extensive, with a lot of calculations. Should you know them as well? »
- The definition of a planet was a bit confusing. According to Wikipedia there is no universally accepted definition of an exoplanet! Also, the formation of the Solar system should be explained in more detail. »
18. Additional comments- Good job! Especially Eskil»
- Great course, I liked it a lot! »
- The exercise lessons were really good and helped a lot to see connections between the different subjects! Great work!»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.62
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.62 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.9
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|