ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

FUF085 Electrodynamics

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-01-21
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 45%
Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»4 44%
Around 25 hours/week»1 11%
Around 30 hours/week»1 11%
At least 35 hours/week»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»1 11%
25%»1 11%
50%»1 11%
75%»0 0%
100%»6 66%

Genomsnitt: 4

- I quited after a while, because I couldn"t handle the workload.» (25%)
- I missed only one lecture.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 44%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 11%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 80%
No, the goals are set too high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 16%
Yes, definitely»3 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- perhaps it would be good with a few more questions about the home problems at the oral exam.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»1 11%
Some extent»2 22%
Large extent»3 33%
Great extent»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- If more time had been spent on understanding and making connections it would have been better.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 11%
Large extent»5 55%
Great extent»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- Good book » (Large extent)

8. Did we spend too much time on electro-/magnetostatics (chapter 1-5) / would it have been better to move more quickly to the advanced material (chapter 6 and beyond)?

- Yes, I would have liked to get into the more advanced stuff earlier»
- I think so. In the beginning it was maybe to similar to the course in the second year at the engineering physics program.»
- No, even though we (F) have had a course in electromagnetic field theory I think it is nice to repeat and freshen up electro and magnetostaics. It is important to master the basics before you move on with more advanced stuff.»
- No.»
- No we did not and no it would not have been better. Even though I have taken a similar course before I still needed the repetition and it would have been very difficult to understand the more advanced material if we had not gone through the basic material so carefully. »
- a little faster would have been better»
- I dont know»
- No. Since my previous course on electrostatics was pretty bad I was pleased we spend much time on statics which increased my understanding greatly. »

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 22%
Rather well»3 33%
Very well»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- No problem with the home page but more feed back on our home problems is desired. Only four home problems were given back before the oral exam. » (Rather badly)
- Missade man en lektion stod det ibland på hemsidan ett helt kapitel i Jackson, medan det som gicks igenom endast var en tredjedel eller hälften. Att ta ikapp en enda lektion tog drygt 8h studier, utan att titta på inlämningen.» (Rather badly)
- As a student at GU it was a bit difficult to find it, but that could have been because I have never used Chalmers" "studentportal" before.» (Rather well)

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 33%
Very good»2 22%
I did not seek help»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 4.11

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 22%
Rather well»3 33%
Very well»1 11%
I did not seek cooperation»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

12. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 37%
High»3 37%
Too high»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

- The course workload was high but I think that is necessary in order to comprehend the material.» (High)
- I didn"t manage to cope with all the work. Too many heavy assignments!» (Too high)

13. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 44%
High»4 44%
Too high»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»1 11%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 11%
Good»6 66%
Excellent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Unbelivable heavy. To have such hard assignments to every lecture was too much, way too much!» (Poor)
- I would have liked to see more of the later chapters in Jackson» (Good)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Most of the hand-in problems were fun and illuminating.»
- The book.»
- Form of examination, content and literature. The number of home problems is reasonable.»
- The text book is very good and should be preserved. Also, the first chapters of the book should be gone through carefully next year as well.»
- the introduction to electrostatics and magnetostatics is a good thing but perhaps should be more briefly»
- The literature»
- the oral exam»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Scale down the magneto/electrostatics a bit to allow more dynamics and relativistic considerations.»
- Would be nice with more focus on the physics rather than deriving all formulas in the first chapters.»
- »
- En fråga per föreläsning, inte 2st. Att ha två stycken till torsdag, fredag respektive måndag fick många i kursen att tröttna / må dåligt.»
- Perhaps there should be fewer hand in assignments? »
- too many hand-ins per week»
- The assignments! It was a kind of good idea to have problems due to each lecture, but many times there were more than just one at a time + they were to demanding! Perhaps it"s a better idea to have one, or at most two, of the assignments each week. »

17. Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.66
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.66
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.66

Kursutvärderingssystem från