Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

ICT Economics and Policy SP 2 2012/2013 TEK320

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-01-31
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40%
Kontaktperson: Erik Bohlin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 25%
Around 20 hours/week»9 56%
Around 25 hours/week»3 18%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.93

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 6%
50%»2 12%
75%»10 62%
100%»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.93

- actually 80, but I would have gone on all 100 % if I could have» (75%)
- Only did because it was compulsory. Way too low standard on lectures where I knew most of the info beforehand. » (75%)
- Missed 2 lectures» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

16 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 25%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 37%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 37%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»3 21%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 78%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.78

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

15 svarande

No, not at all»1 6%
To some extent»9 60%
Yes, definitely»3 20%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- Rather: I believe it did» (To some extent)

Examination: Project and take home exam

6. How long time did you spend on the take home exam?*

16 svarande

Less than 10 hours»0 0%
10-20 hours»2 12%
20-30 hours»7 43%
30-40 hours»4 25%
More than 40 hours»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- But the last hours were quite inefficient because I got the flu.» (20-30 hours)

7. How long time did you spend on the project*

16 svarande

Less than 10 hours»0 0%
10-20 hours»0 0%
20-30 hours»3 18%
30-40 hours»6 37%
More than 40 hours»7 43%

Genomsnitt: 4.25 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

8. What grade would you give the take-home exam as a means to learning*

16 svarande

Very bad»1 6%
Bad»0 0%
Average»2 12%
Good»9 56%
Very good»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.93 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

9. What grade would you give the project as a means to learning?*

16 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»2 12%
Average»2 12%
Good»11 68%
Very good»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.68 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.84

Teaching and course administration

10. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»4 25%
Some extent»8 50%
Large extent»4 25%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I attended almost all lectures, mainly due to them being mandatory. I"m afraid the lectures were more of a one-way communication than something encouraging the students to take part. » (Small extent)

11. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»7 43%
Large extent»8 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.43

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very badly»1 6%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»10 62%
Very well»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- Would have been nice with pingpong though» (Rather well)

Study climate

13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

16 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 12%
Rather good»9 56%
Very good»3 18%
I did not seek help»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

- Asked for help to find relevant literature to the project, was referred to Google Scholar - as that hadn"t crossed our minds (wanted more indication on authors etc.)! Other than that, didn"t seek help» (Rather poor)

14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

16 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 6%
Rather well»4 25%
Very well»11 68%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

15. How was the course workload?

16 svarande

Too low»1 6%
Low»2 12%
Adequate»9 56%
High»4 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

16. How was the total workload this study period?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 12%
Adequate»7 43%
High»6 37%
Too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- Due to the planning of other courses, I had more to do than usual. The take-home exam, the project together with the other projects created a too high workload» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Poor»2 12%
Fair»2 12%
Adequate»7 43%
Good»4 25%
Excellent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Keep a clear agenda at the lectures and things will improve!» (Poor)
- I do not see the point of this course. I did not learn anything worth knowing and still expects good grades.» (Poor)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Take home exam»
- Erik Bohlin"s lectures»
- Take-home exam and project»
- Take home exam »
- Project. It is always nice.»
- Take home exam»
- The project group.»

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- I prefer the possibility to hand in home-exams anonymously on PingPong before the option of writing birthdate and initials at studieportalen, one good reason to switch to PingPong»
- The economy lectures with Chatchai were good, but on a to low level for many of us. THey did therefore not bring any value. The lectures from Erik Bohlin was too low in energy, why many students including me stopped listening. It was first until the take-home exam, when I read through the slides again, when I realized how much knowledge Erik possesses. Instead of forcing the students to come to class by having mandatory lectures, try to have more small discussions in small groups in class regarding these topics. That involves the students better, reduces the one-way lecturing and increases learning»
- Should include a small test early on to get students motivated »
- The manner of the questions on the test. They should be related to the topic.»
- Start at a higher level and work on the lecture slides!!!»
- For me, the questions for the take home exam were too long. It would be nice to reduce them. »
- I would like to have less about ICT-infrastructure and more about ICT-content e.g. software, internet-economy.»

20. Additional comments

- Don"t check your e-mail when people are presenting!»
- We do not care of things you have done.»
- Too much info on the lecture slides»
- More punchy lectures !»

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.84
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.71

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från