Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Technology and Society SP2 2012/13, TEK225

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-01-31
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 20%
Kontaktperson: Erik Bohlin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 50%
Around 20 hours/week»2 25%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»2 25%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Less. More like 4h/week average.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

8 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 25%
50%»1 12%
75%»3 37%
100%»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 37%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 25%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 12%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- This course should be called ICT and society.» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 87%
No, the goals are set too high»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.12

- Too many things to do in the course: Three home exams One individual report One big group report And all of them are compulsory. Have a grade limit and let the students choose which ones they want to do as long as they have enough accumulated points at the end of the course.» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»1 12%
To some extent»4 50%
Yes, definitely»3 37%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

Examination: Project and take home exam

6. How long time did you spend on all 3 take home exams combined together?

8 svarande

Less than 10 hours»0 0%
10-20 hours»2 25%
20-30 hours»2 25%
30-40 hours»0 0%
More than 40 hours»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- It was difficult to write at first but then it all came out (that"s what she said).» (10-20 hours)
- Gjorde endast de två första» (20-30 hours)

7. How long time did you spend on the project?

8 svarande

Less than 10 hours»3 37%
10-20 hours»0 0%
20-30 hours»4 50%
30-40 hours»1 12%
More than 40 hours»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

8. What grade would you give the take home exam as a means to learning?

8 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Average»1 12%
Good»4 50%
Very good»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

9. What grade would you give the project as a means to learning?

8 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»1 12%
Average»3 37%
Good»2 25%
Very good»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- We were a group of 2 people, where it was uncertain if no2 would attend or not. Mixing of groups by the course administration would be preferable» (Average)

Teaching and course administration

10. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»2 25%
Some extent»5 62%
Large extent»1 12%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

11. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»1 12%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»5 62%
Great extent»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»1 12%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 37%
Very well»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- Ibrahims" slides where nowhere to be found for the third home exam!» (Very badly)

Study climate

13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 12%
Rather good»3 37%
Very good»3 37%
I did not seek help»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Erik "Big Dawg" Bohlin, seemed to always be in a hurry when asking questions after a lecture. Eriks responding speed when using email was much better.» (Rather good)

14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 25%
Very well»6 75%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Bad start good finish» (Rather well)

15. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»1 12%
Low»2 25%
Adequate»3 37%
High»2 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- I"d prefere more spread out hand ins» (High)

16. How was the total workload this study period?

8 svarande

Too low»1 12%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 25%
High»3 37%
Too high»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- I took three courses this period and expected this one to be the least prioritized but it came in second place out of the three.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»1 12%
Fair»1 12%
Adequate»4 50%
Good»2 25%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Ibrahim, he"s a nice guy.»
- Home exams!»

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The course title. From "Technology and Society" to => "IT and Society"»
- The individual project needs better instructions. Also the questions could be more precise.»
- turn down the ICT part and focus more on a wider subject»

20. Additional comments

- I was not expecting the immense focus on broadband when I signed up for the course. A heads up would have been nice. »
- it felt like the entier cors whas about ICT and nor susiety and theknology. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från