ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

H12 lp2 Condensed matter physics, FKA091

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-01-22
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Bengt-Erik Mellander»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 4 30%

Around 20 hours/week» 4 30%

Around 25 hours/week» 3 23%

Around 30 hours/week» 1 7%

At least 35 hours/week» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

- this theoretical course requires to work hard» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

12 svarande

0%» 1 8%

25%» 2 16%

50%» 0 0%

75%» 4 33%

100%» 5 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- this theoretical course requires to follow the explanation of the Lecture» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

12 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 6 50%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 3 25%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 3 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- There is no course PM. There has to be one!» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- There were no course PM. There was no grading values on the exam» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- at the begining of the course the Lecture has tried his best to explain us what he expect us to know and the main things that we should keep in mind» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 1 12%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 6 75%

No, the goals are set too high» 1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Considering that students from an engineering physics background already have studied solid state physics this course should give something more than just a recapitulation of (although be it more thorough than) the previous material.» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all» 1 12%

To some extent» 1 12%

Yes, definitely» 5 62%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- The exam was very vague in its format. Many questions vere of the type "describe..." which leaves room for interpretation. It was possible to achive well despite not having studied the course well. It was also possible to rely heavily on the course in solid state physics from the bachelors program. The level of difficulty varied greatly between the questions despite having the same number of points attached to them.» (No, not at all)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent» 4 33%

Some extent» 4 33%

Large extent» 4 33%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I was no fan of the lectures. A bit more structure would have helped a lot.» (Small extent)
- There was no check box for no extent. » (Small extent)
- at his age, it has become clear that the management of the course for the actual teacher alone is difficult for him. finding suitable locals,..ect» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 5 45%

Large extent» 5 45%

Great extent» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

- His lexture notes were good, but the book was not so good. Would need a bether book,» (Some extent)
- The book is from the 1970s and needs to be updated. A lot of focus is on old semiclassical models and aproximation techniques which are of little relevance of today with quantum physics and modern computers. Students of today don"t shun a thorough quantum mechanical derivation.» (Some extent)
- The lecturenotes are Great! » (Large extent)
- the course book has helped to solv many problems related to the course» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

12 svarande

Very badly» 1 8%

Rather badly» 2 16%

Rather well» 8 66%

Very well» 1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- Could not find a course PM. No access to old exams.» (Rather badly)
- Except for the lecture notes, very little information was communicated to the students.» (Rather badly)
- all the well prepared lecture notes have been pasted prior the concerned lecture (wich is good),the locals were indicated, eventhough sometimes we have been changing at the last minute, » (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

12 svarande

Very poor» 1 8%

Rather poor» 1 8%

Rather good» 3 25%

Very good» 4 33%

I did not seek help» 3 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

- Arriving late, leaving the room during breaks, leaving early and making oneself generally unavailable is not a good way of creating opportunities for questions.» (Very poor)
- The lecturer does not answer questions during the break. The TA left for Boston.» (Rather poor)
- Some help I got were from my fellow student and that was more efficient to me» (I did not seek help)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 1 9%

Very well» 7 63%

I did not seek cooperation» 3 27%

Genomsnitt: 4.18

- Because, getting some of their idea has helped me to have insight in solving problems related to the course» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

12 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 3 25%

High» 7 58%

Too high» 2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.91

- In general, the workload could have been increased if the number of lectures had been increased. Three lectures and one excercise would be more appropriate amount of teaching considering that the course was 7,5 credits.» (Adequate)
- Tycker att kursen var lite svår» (High)
- A lot of material in a very short time» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 2 18%

High» 7 63%

Too high» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 4

- A lot of material in a very short time» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

12 svarande

Poor» 2 16%

Fair» 1 8%

Adequate» 6 50%

Good» 2 16%

Excellent» 1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.91 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I would strongly dissuade others from taking it.» (Poor)
- because it fitted my expectation to like 65%» (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The home problems should stay they are important. The paper with a summary of the lecture is very good.»
- The lecture notes, but without the faults in definition of S+ and S- »
- The professor and his lecture notes.»
- Vet ej»
- the good habit of pasting all the well prepared lecture notes have been pasted prior the concerned lecture »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More structure on the lecture. »
- The home problems are too difficult There is no course PM The conditions for the exam were changed very late There is no information available there are no previous exams available»
- A better blackboard usage on the lectures. Have a more structured lecture so you can follow when you read your notes afterwards. »
- The course needs to be reworked fundamentally.»
- The assistant could be more co-operative.»
- Föreläsningarna borde förbättras lite. Mycket bra med föreläsningsanteckningarna men vissa delar borde beskrivas tydligare och göras mer lättförståeligt, tex tau-approximationen.»
- Teacher should be empowered (with an Assistant) in some classes, why not putting some exercise sessions in the course?»

16. Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.91

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.91
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.47

Kursutvärderingssystem från