ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MVE140 Foundations of probability theory

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-01-21
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 39%
Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 53%
Around 20 hours/week»4 30%
Around 25 hours/week»2 15%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.61

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»1 7%
25%»1 7%
50%»0 0%
75%»6 46%
100%»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 4

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»6 46%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 38%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.23

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 10%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 90%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 40%
Yes, definitely»4 40%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»2 15%
Some extent»6 46%
Large extent»4 30%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

- I got the feeling that the lectures weren"t really well prepared, a lot of time was spent on figuring out proofs. Also he often realized he"d missed some important parts earlier and had to go back, so the material wasn"t in any good order. » (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»6 46%
Large extent»6 46%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.61

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 7%
Rather well»6 46%
Very well»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 15%
Rather good»3 23%
Very good»3 23%
I did not seek help»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- It was very easy to feel stupid» (Rather poor)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 15%
Very well»6 46%
I did not seek cooperation»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 4.23

11. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low»1 7%
Low»3 23%
Adequate»7 53%
High»2 15%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

12. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»1 7%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»4 30%
High»7 53%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»3 23%
Adequate»4 30%
Good»4 30%
Excellent»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.38 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I would rather see that Sergei comes prepared to the lectures, the inconsistent tempo of the lectures makes it fairly difficult to comprehend what is important in the course» (Fair)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The tutorials, they seemed a bit trickier then the actual exam, perhaps make them more like the exam and make them mandatory. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The lectures»
- Drop the scare tactics to get people to come to the lectures. To say that the lecture material is wider than the litterature, to than say the opposite after the last lecture is just ridiculouse. Also the vle-excercises can be skipped, didn"t learn anything from them. »
- The teacher sometimes felt kind of unprepeared and non-structured»
- 1.Add more stuff in the course. It"s not enough.Workload too low. 2.Test more on measures. This test did not include any measure stuff.»
- The presentation of the tuturial problem on the black board. »
- I think you would have better use of this class if it was in LP1 instead of LP2, especially if you take Stochastic analysis I and II.»

16. Additional comments

- In my opinion the level of the course could be stepped up, as all of the students (?) have a mathematical statistics course since earlier which covers a lot of basic probabilistics. Focus on the theoretical parts.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.38
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.38
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.59

Kursutvärderingssystem från