Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MVE170 Basic stochastic processes

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-01-21
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 28%
Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»8 50%
Around 20 hours/week»6 37%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»2 12%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.75

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%»1 6%
25%»2 12%
50%»1 6%
75%»8 50%
100%»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- I got special help!» (25%)
- the lecture hall was often very cold » (25%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

16 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»8 50%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 6%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 12%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»3 27%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 54%
No, the goals are set too high»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 15%
Yes, definitely»7 53%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»4 25%
Some extent»5 31%
Large extent»4 25%
Great extent»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

- the lectures was very fuzzy and it was hard to keep concentrated» (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»6 37%
Large extent»5 31%
Great extent»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- I believe the book is very good if you allready know the topic. For me however, it was to compactly written» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 12%
Rather well»6 37%
Very well»8 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- it was good that most of the information was handed out at the first lecture and that continous mail are sent out to everybody but it should be supplemented with information on the homepage» (Rather badly)
- I really like when a teacher invest his time in comunicating a lot with students » (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

16 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 6%
Rather good»8 50%
Very good»4 25%
I did not seek help»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.56

- A special time in the timetable for exercise session and the oppurtunity to ask question and discuss problems. » (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

16 svarande

Very poorly»1 6%
Rather poorly»1 6%
Rather well»3 18%
Very well»9 56%
I did not seek cooperation»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

11. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low»1 6%
Low»5 33%
Adequate»6 40%
High»2 13%
Too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

12. How was the total workload this study period?

15 svarande

Too low»1 6%
Low»1 6%
Adequate»7 46%
High»4 26%
Too high»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»6 37%
Good»10 62%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.62 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- det är en intressant och nyttig kurs men den är ganska tunn för 7.5 hp» (Adequate)
- Sadly TM students got little time to spend on the course because of electromagnetic field course» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The computer excersises and Patrik himself.»
- The teacher»
- Good structure in the course. Very good information from the teacher and easy to find and follow the plan of the course.»
- Computational tasks»
- its good»
- den detaljerade planeringen»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe an addition to the course litterature to aid our intuition instead of just taking formulas from the book without much context to them.»
- Exercise sessions with instructors»
- To have som mandatory Matlab-exercise some kind of presentation. Also the lecture of the course was to much copy information from the book, I wish to have some more explanations from the teacher during the lectures.»
- Maybe have some extra credit work to give you points to the exam.»
- planeringen»
- The book had several mistakes in it. Maybe considering changing the book?»

16. Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.62

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.62
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.65

Kursutvärderingssystem från