Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Tailored Materials and Commercialization Aspects - 2012, MTT081
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-12-19 - 2013-01-10 Antal svar: 12 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 28% Kontaktperson: Uta Klement» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.12 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 5 | | 41% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 4 | | 33% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 3 | | 25% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.83 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 12 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 5 | | 41% |
100%» | | 7 | | 58% |
Genomsnitt: 4.58
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?12 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 3 | | 25% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 9 | | 75% |
Genomsnitt: 3.25 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.10 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 10 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?11 svarande
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 1 | | 9% |
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 9% |
Yes, definitely» | | 9 | | 81% |
Genomsnitt: 3.63 - The presentations combined with the exams would have given a better picture » (To some extent)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?12 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 16% |
Large extent» | | 8 | | 66% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 3 7. Did the presentations by entrepreneurs/company representatives added to your understanding of materials and how you can commercialize an idea?12 svarande
The presentations were not of help» | | 1 | | 8% |
They were good but not helpful for better understanding» | | 2 | | 16% |
Presentations were good and added partly to understanding» | | 5 | | 41% |
Presentations were good and helped a lot» | | 4 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - De var av olika kvalitet, Sandviks var svår att hänga med på medan Oxelon var mycket intessant!» (Presentations were good and added partly to understanding)
- Excellent and should be continued during successive years» (Presentations were good and helped a lot)
8. Did the lectures given by Chalmers Innovation provided knowledge you expected from the commercialization part in the course?12 svarande
Presentations were of no help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Presentations were ok but it was not what I expected» | | 1 | | 8% |
Presentations were ok and this was what I expected» | | 8 | | 66% |
Presentations provided more inforamtion than I expected» | | 3 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.16 9. What did you in general think about the handout material?12 svarande
not useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
useful to some extent» | | 1 | | 8% |
good» | | 8 | | 66% |
very good» | | 3 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.16 - Användbara eftersom att det var det enda material som vi fick, men de borde MINST ha kompletterats med föreläsningsanteckningar. Handout materialet var svårläst och därför aningen svårt att ta till sig. » (useful to some extent)
- Could be more descriptive in some cases» (good)
- sometimes very coplicated» (good)
- References should have been provided for all handouts for a more detailed personal study (even if not graded)» (very good)
10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?12 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 1 | | 8% |
Very well» | | 11 | | 91% |
Genomsnitt: 3.91 11. Do you think the presentation added to your learning and is an important part of the course?12 svarande
not helpful» | | 1 | | 8% |
no meaning» | | 0 | | 0% |
ok» | | 5 | | 41% |
to large extent» | | 6 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 3.33 12. Do you think the sales pitch was adding to your learning and is an important part of the course?12 svarande
no, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
it was fun but didn"t help in my learning» | | 4 | | 33% |
to some extent» | | 6 | | 50% |
yes, to large extent» | | 2 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 2.83 - bit it is very funny» (to some extent)
- Presentation skills are important everywhere!» (yes, to large extent)
Study climate13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?12 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very good» | | 11 | | 91% |
I did not seek help» | | 1 | | 8% |
Genomsnitt: 4.08 14. How was the course workload?12 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 2 | | 16% |
Adequate» | | 9 | | 75% |
High» | | 1 | | 8% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.91 15. How was the total workload this study period?12 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 2 | | 16% |
Adequate» | | 6 | | 50% |
High» | | 2 | | 16% |
Too high» | | 2 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 3.33
Summarizing questions16. What is your general impression of the course?12 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 3 | | 25% |
Excellent» | | 9 | | 75% |
Genomsnitt: 4.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Hade jag bara fått mer material att läsa (bok + föreläsningsanteckningar) skulle den här kursen komma på min topp-tre-listan över bästa kurser under min chalmerstid. Så mycket bra kurs, men vi behöver mer litteratur och material för att kunna förstå kursen djupare.» (Excellent)
17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- * Grupparbetet»
- The project work was great, and should be preserved.»
- presentation and sales pitch»
- Sales pitch»
- The invited company lecturers»
- Generally very pleasant and interesting course. Very much needed as part of engineering education.»
- Project and presentations from industries»
- guest lectures and chalmers innovation»
- The presentations and poster work»
18. What should definitely be changed to next year?- * Mer material att läsa, för att få bättre förståelse.
* Dela ut föreläsningsanteckningar»
- make poster compulsory for the groups»
- mandatory presence during certain lectures should be removed»
- More clear about the sales pitch, how it should be done»
- CSL is hard to understand, and electro magnetism as well. (Coesivity, etc)»
- Should have visit to some companies»
- going for a visit to a company»
- Companies with local technical facilities whether Swedish or otherwise could be allowed as subjects for the project»
19. Additional comments- Best guest lecturer was Oxeon.»
- The best course I"ve had and I wish more courses had such industrial linkages »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.75
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.75 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.93
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|