ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

KBT215 - Radioecology and Radioanalytical Chemistry 2012, KBT215

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-19 - 2013-01-07
Antal svar: 3
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 42%
Kontaktperson: Stefan Allard»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Kemiteknik 300 hp

1. Lectures: Difficulty

Please grade the difficulty of the lectures in general, with 1 being easy and 5 hard.

3 svarande

1»2 66%
2»0 0%
3»1 33%
4»0 0%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

2. Lectures: Interesting

Please grade how interesting the lectures in general have been, with 1 being "not interesting" and 5 "very interesting".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 66%
5»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Especially Henriks were very good, lots of math and military insight.» (5)

3. Lectures: Relevance

Please grade how relevant the lectures in general have been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»3 100%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Really depends on your field of affiliation» (4)
- Felt a bit like repetition.» (4)

4. Lectures: Time for questions

Please indicate if there has been enough time for for questions, with 1 being "not enough time" and 5 being "very much time".

3 svarande

1»1 33%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

5. Lectures: Number of lectures

Would you have liked more lectures to cover the course?

3 svarande

Yes»1 33%
No»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

6. Lecturer: Prof. Gunnar Skarnemark

Please grade the lecturer, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 being "excellent".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»1 33%
5»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

7. Lecturer: Adj.Prof. Henrik Ramebäck

Please grade the lecturer, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 being "excellent".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»3 100%

Genomsnitt: 5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- He"s a warrior. Meaning that he is very good.» (5)

8. Lecturer: Dr. Stefan Allard

Please grade the lecturer, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 being "excellent".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»3 100%

Genomsnitt: 5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

9. Laboratory exercises: understanding

Please indicate how the labs have increased your nuclear chemistry understanding, with 1 being "not at all" and 5 being "very much".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 33%
4»1 33%
5»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- More background reading would be nice.» (4)

10. Laboratory exercises: relevance

Please indicate how relevant to the course the labs have been, with 1 being "not relevant" and 5 "very relevant".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 66%
5»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

11. Laboratory exercises: interesting

Please indicate how interesting the labs have been in general, with 1 being "not interesting" and 5 "very interesting".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 33%
4»2 66%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

12. Laboratory exercises: Alpha-spectrometry - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 66%
5»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

13. Laboratory exercises: Alpha-spectrometry - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»2 66%
3»1 33%
4»0 0%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. Laboratory exercises: Alpha-spectrometry - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Lic. Eng. Elin Löfström-Engdahl, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»3 100%

Genomsnitt: 5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Elin is a nice girl and a proficient lab supervisor.» (5)

15. Laboratory exercises: Liquid scintillation - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 33%
4»0 0%
5»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

16. Laboratory exercises: Liquid scintillation - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 33%
3»1 33%
4»1 33%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

17. Laboratory exercises: Liquid scintillation - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Dr. Stefan Allard, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»3 100%

Genomsnitt: 5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

18. Laboratory exercises: U-uptake by plants - relevance

Please grade this lab with respect to course relevance, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 33%
3»1 33%
4»0 0%
5»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

19. Laboratory exercises: U-uptake by plants - difficulty

Please grade this lab with respect to difficulty, with 1 being "very easy" and 5 "very hard".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 33%
3»2 66%
4»0 0%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

20. Laboratory exercises: U-uptake by plants - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Prof. Gunnar Skarnemark, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»3 100%

Genomsnitt: 5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Gunnar is a nice man who don"t rush into things.» (5)

21. Laboratory exercises: U-uptake by plants - supervisor

Please grade the supervisor Lic. Eng. Anna Gustafsson, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 66%
4»0 0%
5»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

22. General: Workload

Please indicate how you perceive the 7.5 hp workload, with 1 being "very low" and 5 "very high".

3 svarande

1»2 66%
2»1 33%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

- Highly dependent on the person who takes the course and hen"s background.» (1)

23. General: Course material - handouts

Please grade the course material used, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»1 33%
3»0 0%
4»2 66%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- However, slides of gamma spec contained too many questions and not answers. Not that it"s a bad thing but Ppl who missed the lecture were lost. » (4)

24. General: Textbook

In this course no designated textbook was used. What is your opinion about that?

- Text book for reference would be nice. »
- Well, a book would have been nice, but since the course takes up a lot of different aspects I understand it is a problem. One can also find attitional information by oneself. »
- No problem.»

25. General: Administration

Please grade the course administration in general, with 1 being "terrible" and 5 "excellent".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 66%
4»1 33%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Uranium uptake PM was not available.» (3)

26. General: Information

Please indicate how well course information was provided, with 1 being "terribly" and 5 "excellently".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»1 33%
5»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

27. Exam

Please indicate how well the exam reflected the course, with 1 being "poorly" and 5 "very well".

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 66%
4»0 0%
5»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The part b was a repeat with changed numbers. I was hoping for a something different (I do not mean some hair pulling difficult ones) :-P » (3)
- Most of the theory questions had to do with underlying nuclear physics and less with actual analysis and radioecology. Not all but most of them.» (3)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.91

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.91
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.72

Kursutvärderingssystem från