Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MCC015 HT12, MCC015

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-16 - 2013-01-18
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 46%
Kontaktperson: Alexei Kalaboukhov»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

1. Approximately how many hours per week did you work with the course?

Estimate the total time, including both teaching activities and your own studies. Try
to estimate the average for the whole study period.

6 svarande

At most 10 hours»0 0%
About 15 hours»3 50%
About 20 hours»2 33%
About 25 hours»0 0%
About 30 hours»1 16%
At least 35 hours»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

2. How much of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25&»0 0%
50%»1 16%
75%»3 50%
100%»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 16%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 83%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

4. Are the course goals reasonable considering the number of credits?

6 svarande

Yes I think so»4 66%
Hesitant»1 16%
No»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

5. Did the examination (assignments + written exam) assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 33%
Yes, definitely»3 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 33%
Large extent»4 66%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

7. To what extent has the course literature and other course material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 16%
Large extent»5 83%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 16%
Acceptable»4 66%
Good»1 16%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Some problems with the last lecture notes but otherwise ok. » (Acceptable)

9. What do you think about Laborations?

- ok»
- Rather good, it can be better if some experimental demonstration can be shown for the SET Lab.»
- If it is a computer based lab it should be information about bringing a computer or better book a computer room for the lab. »
- It would have been better if the SET lab was a real lab (with working devices) instead of a classroom session. The other labs were reasonable.»
- Good overviews of the labs, and enough work to make the information from the lectures stick better in the mind»

10. How was the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 33%
Good»3 50%
Excellent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

11. How has the cooperation been, between you and the other students?

6 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»2 33%
Very good»4 66%
I have not tried to cooperate»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

12. How was the total workload during the entire study period?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»4 66%
High»1 16%
Too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

13. How do you evaluate the workload of labs for this course?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»4 66%
High»2 33%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- Reasonable workload.» (Low)

14. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Worst course ever»0 0%
Fair»2 33%
Good»1 16%
Excellent»3 50%
Best course ever»0 0%
No answer»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

15. Additional comments

- Alexei Kalaboukhov did a great job. But two many professors taking care of the lessons and different supervisors during the lab session made the course extremely chaotic.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från