Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

LP2 12/13 AUT162 FVHHW: Resid healthcare

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-01-17 - 2013-01-31
Antal svar: 17
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 60%
Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Arkitektur 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

17 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»2 11%
At least 35 hours/week»15 88%

Genomsnitt: 4.88

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

17 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 23%
100%»13 76%

Genomsnitt: 4.76

- We did not take every tutoring but most of them. » (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

17 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 11%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 29%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 58%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 6%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»15 93%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.93

- I think we could have had more small assignments or hand-ins during the course.» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

16 svarande

No, not at all»1 6%
To some extent»7 43%
Yes, definitely»3 18%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- For the critique it seemed as we reached the goal, but of course the final examination did not take place yet.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»2 11%
Some extent»7 41%
Large extent»6 35%
Great extent»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.47

- Handledningen har varit bra. Men föreläsningar och övrigt har varit mindre nyttiga.» (Small extent)
- We didn"t have tutoring that often, and to get tutoring from two people is difficult, because it takes very long before the tutoror is coming back to give more advise, and the other tutoror has no idea what has been said with the first tutoror.» (Small extent)
- I would have liked tutoring better adapted to the subject» (Some extent)
- Would have been good to have more lectures in the beginning, felt like some information came to late when the projects had come quite far.» (Some extent)
- The tutoring yes, the teaching a bit so and so. We have been told to design normal aartments that are adapted for seniors and future needs. <But we"ve had lectures about care homes and institutions which seemed rather irrelevant.» (Some extent)
- Björn Gross has taught us a lot this course.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»10 58%
Large extent»5 29%
Great extent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.35

- It was alright, but the articles we read were not so interesting.And many of the books in the bookshelf in the k´,library were more about nursing homes and retired people rather than about visions and future dilemmas for people living and getting care in their homes. THat lacked during the course, this overall discussion.» (Some extent)
- I would have liked more seminars. » (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

17 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»3 17%
Rather well»7 41%
Very well»7 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

- a bit unclear at times, but most often rather well.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

17 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 5%
Rather good»3 17%
Very good»12 70%
I did not seek help»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

17 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 5%
Rather well»5 29%
Very well»11 64%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

- With one fellow student it worked extremely well and with another extremely bad.» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»15 88%
High»2 11%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- not very balanced. It could have been planned so we could start off better and come to a result earlier instead of having the great workload in the end» (Adequate)
- We worked three persons together and I think that had a great impact on the experienced workload.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»10 58%
High»7 41%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- too high in the end, could have been higher in the beginning» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

17 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 5%
Adequate»5 29%
Good»7 41%
Excellent»4 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.82 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Very interesting subject but not very well organized» (Fair)
- More visions and discussion about how it will be in 20, 50, and 100 years! We did not talk about that...» (Adequate)
- I wish we would have had some more inspiring lectures. During the study trip we could have had more interesting houses to visit. The site was very difficult to work with.» (Adequate)
- More lectures on this type of housing. » (Good)
- The workshops, the tutoring and de final critics with Björn Gross were fantastic!» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the studyvisits and the literature seminar! They should come as early as possible in the course. Everything related to the care-topic was very interesting and good»
- study visits»
- Visit to bovison.»
- Stämningen i hela gruppen har varit väldigt bra. »
- The social awareness and the literature!»
- It is an interesting topic, so it can be interesting discussions! The full scale laboration in Lillhagen was good. THe external presentation was good, but everyone should have done it in Swedish, and then there could be time for questions after to everyone. .. Would be nice to have an external exhibition too...»
- Studytrips, workshops.»
- The study trip to Stockholm was so and so. Would have been better if we could have come inside in more apartments. Or maybe do study visits to the best examples in Gothenburg and saved the money for an external critic on the final crits instead of Susanne Klase.»
- The workshops»
- Björn Gross »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Put the seminars and studyvisits in the beginning. Closer connection between the different model-workshops would also be good»
- more study visits, study visits in gothenburg who is sheduled, meetings with staff who are going to work in the building we created. other teachers at the critique ( the last one) if think it´,s good to have other architects opinions. björn and susanne had already seen our projects. some extern people.»
- Litteraturseminarium vore mycket bättre att ha tidigare i kursen. För stressigt i slutet. Svårt att tillgodogöra sig då. Gärna lite mer litteratur om trygghetsboende. Och dumt med läxa innan kursstart, då vi har 100% studier veckan innan också. »
- Kanske externa kritiker hade varit spännande. Fast inte om det betyder mindre händleningstillfällen. Handledningen har fungerat väldigt bra. »
- I would wish for a more positive attitude from the tutors. More optimism. We are here to learn, thereby, everything we do cannot and will not be perfect in the beginning nor in the end.»
- The study trip was interesting but agian we looked ore at nursing home and current issues, rather that visions for the future. Some times at tutoring we got to explain everything all over and over again cause their were different tutors. Better to have one or one in phase one one ind phase two aso. Tutoring the last week is a bit unnecessary. Oppurtunity for questions would be better then!»
- More literature to choose from. And collect all the lectures in the first two weeks. »
- An external critic beside Björn Gross on the final critics.»
- Some external critics except for those that tutor during the course.»
- More tutoring with the same person. Guest critics.»

16. Additional comments

- i really like the teatchers! good woork björn och inga!»
- In the end it felt like much of the critique was on a normal dwelling, not much focus was put on what we had done specially for this to be a senior housing.»
- Lite rörigt ibland, svårt att få raka besked. »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.82

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.82
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.7

Kursutvärderingssystem från