|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
LP2 12/13 ARK323 Design and planning for social inclusionStatus: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2013-01-17 - 2013-01-31 Antal svar: 17 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 62% Kontaktperson: Linn Warg» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Arkitektur 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.82 - I would say sometimes 40 hr or bit more...» (At least 35 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.7 - all lectures seemed compulsory as you were given a supplementary task for missing even a single one.» (100%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.52 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.82 - So far I feel like the master has challanged me less than the last year of my bachelor studies.» (No, the goals are set too low) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.47 - While I think our project did show our understanding of using participation, the connection to the Million Homes Period was a bit less developed, but a good discussion around it was brought out well in the final critiques. » (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.76 - I think it would have been better for most students if the teacher would have been more present and clearer in his expectations every step of the way» (Some extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.76 - Okay for background and general ideas, some were quite repetitive to the lectures and therefore didn"t really add that much new insight or information» (Some extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.94 - allways very last minute» (Rather badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.35 - While Pål was always open to our questions, sometimes the answers were not so useful or relevant - maybe in part because he was not very involved in the specifics of our project, but also questions about course material were not always clearly answered/resolved. » (Rather poor) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.23 - We could have used more training and help regarding teamwork and conflict management» (Rather well) 11. How was the course workload?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.06 - I studied another course full time paralell to this course.» (Low) 12. How was the total workload this study period?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.12 Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.94 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - It is definitely a good course but should include more of real projects or should foster some form of collaboration between the university and stakeholders for a better outcome. » (Good) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Its all fine.»- Pantrarna Lecture» - Social inclusion tools.» - Study visit med angeredsgymnasiet, urban farming week» - The citizen participation part is important.» - the lecturer» - literature seminars» - lectures about participatory methods and game» - Practicing methods» - The aspect of meeting community actors. » - The class of 62.. Urban farming week.» - - the main teacher - the goals» - realistic projects :)» - Specific highlights of the course that I can pick out include: study trip to Angered, Panthers visit, visit to Mixgården, home visits, urban farming week. Having the course in Hammarkullen was also definitely a plus and quite essential to the success of the course. And having several mid-project period presentations was really helpful to organize thoughts, etc. and keep an internal timeline. It didn"t really work out quite so well, but I liked the idea of having a weekly morning meeting with all the groups to discuss common problems or questions (logistic or project-related). I also really appreciated the emphasis on group and personal reflection with the final assignment that really helped me to put the course in prespective for my personal development and future career. » 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- there was a little detachment from colleagues from local context there is need for frequent meetings to compare notes.Composition of groups should be homogeneous. »- Location of studies. Hammarkullen resident"s are tired of being questioning while nothing changing in their neighborhoods.» - too many lectures, some of them not necessary.» - The turiring session for project» - The study area especially Hammarkullen should be changed because I think it is not adding anything to the course other than what is already known» - the lecturer knows» - n/a» - better tutorials during the project process» - The external assistants gave not much contribution. Put some extra emphasis instead on learning and practicing more participatory methods.» - We should not return to the same community each year. Its too exploitive. » - Higher levles in admision» - - the location of the course (work with another area than Hammarkullen or in a different way) - to have less theoretical courses because sometimes it felt like the same thing over and over again - to have more time for the project - to have two teachers co-managing the course» - administration/organisation/tutoring» - I think there are several things that could really improve the course for next year: - condensing the first part of the course. It was definitely really useful, but could be a lot shorter, maybe by removing some repitive lectures. I think it could have been good, for example to have finished up the majority of the lecture period before the Urban Farming Week and then start the projects immediately after. - the division of groups for the project could have been handeled more efficiently: make sure that all groups have at least two Swedish speakers and a least one non-architect. While some amount of switching in inevitable, I think Pål should have taken more authority in defining the groups and maintaining the groups as formed. -Having the same tutor throughout the course of the project period would be very helpful - maybe Pål and one other tutor (maybe different ones for each group that relate to their projects). Some of the critics from the final presentations could make great tutors (eg. Erik Berg). -organization towards the end of the course could have been a lot better. I think many of us found it quite confusing (and frustrating) how unclear the expectations and specifics were for the community presentations. Even just having Pål present the day before the Bergsjön presentation to clarify things would have made things a lot better. Unfortunately, I think this lack of organization and clarity in general colored what was a really good course that I have certainly learned a lot from and enjoyed along the way. » 16. Additional comments- N/a»- An important course.» - A good course» Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.94 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.73
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%