Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
SP2_12/13_Construction contract relationships, TEK140
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-01-24 Antal svar: 14 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 28% Kontaktperson: Christina Larsson»
1. One question about the course in general*Estimate to what extent, on a scale from 1- 5 , you share the opinion of this statement, where 1 means that you do NOT AT ALL agree with the statement 5 means that you COMPLETELY agree with the statement
Matrisfråga The general impression is that the course was very good* 14 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 7% |
3» | | 2 | | 14% |
4» | | 7 | | 50% |
5» | | 4 | | 28% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 2. Five questions about the courseEstimate to what extent, on a scale from 1- 5 , you share the opinion of these statements, where 1 means that you do NOT AT ALL agree with the statement 5 means that you COMPLETELY agree with the statement
Matrisfråga - Use PingPiong instead...»
- The teachers were professional and held interesting lectures. »
- it is good»
It was clear to me what the learning outcomes of the course were 13 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 7 | | 53% |
4» | | 2 | | 15% |
5» | | 4 | | 30% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.76 The examination and the aims of the course were well related 13 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 8% |
3» | | 3 | | 25% |
4» | | 3 | | 25% |
5» | | 5 | | 41% |
I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4 The course was very well administered 13 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 2 | | 15% |
3» | | 2 | | 15% |
4» | | 7 | | 53% |
5» | | 2 | | 15% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.69 I felt that the course had a high degree of significance for my education 13 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 7% |
3» | | 2 | | 15% |
4» | | 4 | | 30% |
5» | | 6 | | 46% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4.15 The course demanded a high degree of work effort 13 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 2 | | 15% |
3» | | 4 | | 30% |
4» | | 6 | | 46% |
5» | | 1 | | 7% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.46 3. What elements of the course should definitely remain?- Mannheimer and swartling was very good and interesting»
- interview assignment»
- The study visit at Mannheimer Svartling was really interesting and rewarding for me as a student. »
- Both the exam and the written assignment. Also the different lectures with different speakers should remain. »
- Law.»
- Jan Bröchner»
- Interview and visit an actor in the construction industry.»
- it is good course»
4. Were there any elements missing in the course?- Not what I can think of. »
- Would prefer a more Swedish focus.»
- Seminars»
- No»
- form of agreement»
5. What, if anything, do you think should be changed in the course?- Make the interview assigmnent bigger and remove the written assigment »
- Have a more Swedish focus on the course.»
- Better communication about the content of the lectures between the different lecturers (sometimes a lot of things appeared twice or three times).»
- Be more prepared before visiting Mannheimer Swartling. »
- not do change»
6. Which parts/elements of the course were the most important for your learning outcome?If there is anything missing in the list below, please let us know! (Comments)Matrisfråga - it is very good course»
Lectures 13 svarande
-» | | 1 | | 7% |
OK» | | 0 | | 0% |
+» | | 6 | | 46% |
++» | | 6 | | 46% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.3 Exercises 13 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 3 | | 30% |
+» | | 4 | | 40% |
++» | | 3 | | 30% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 3 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3 Workshops 12 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 3 | | 42% |
+» | | 2 | | 28% |
++» | | 2 | | 28% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 5 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.85 Project work 13 svarande
-» | | 2 | | 16% |
OK» | | 2 | | 16% |
+» | | 6 | | 50% |
++» | | 2 | | 16% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.66 Ask questions 13 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 3 | | 25% |
+» | | 6 | | 50% |
++» | | 3 | | 25% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3 Hand -ins 13 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 6 | | 54% |
+» | | 5 | | 45% |
++» | | 0 | | 0% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.45 Examination 13 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 2 | | 15% |
+» | | 5 | | 38% |
++» | | 6 | | 46% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.3 Team work 13 svarande
-» | | 1 | | 8% |
OK» | | 2 | | 16% |
+» | | 6 | | 50% |
++» | | 3 | | 25% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.91 Independent work 13 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 2 | | 20% |
+» | | 3 | | 30% |
++» | | 5 | | 50% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 3 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.3 Occasions with critique (feedback) 13 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 4 | | 40% |
+» | | 5 | | 50% |
++» | | 1 | | 10% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 3 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.7 Guest lectures 13 svarande
-» | | 1 | | 8% |
OK» | | 2 | | 16% |
+» | | 4 | | 33% |
++» | | 5 | | 41% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.08 External study visits 13 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 2 | | 22% |
+» | | 3 | | 33% |
++» | | 4 | | 44% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 4 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.22 Other element 12 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 1 | | 50% |
+» | | 1 | | 50% |
++» | | 0 | | 0% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 10 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75* obligatoriska frågor
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|