Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
SP2_12/13_Environmental systems analysis, VMI010
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-01-27 Antal svar: 15 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 48% Kontaktperson: Christina Larsson»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.15 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 1 | | 6% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 4 | | 26% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 7 | | 46% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 3 | | 20% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 - My own work was dedicated exclusively to group project and assignments. » (Around 20 hours/week)
2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? Matrisfråga - The sustainability day was at the same day as the guest lectures.. Bad timing. »
- There was an unfortunate conflict between a day of guest lectures and the Chalmers Day for Sustainability, which is of great interest to students in this class/program.»
- I partecipated to only one literature seminar. I found it useless. There was absolutely no interaction between class and teacher. I suggest to find a way to make it more engaging or dedicate that extra time to something else.
The assignments have been fundamental for me to understand the tools we were studying.»
- Very good lectures. I hope next year, more students attend the guest lectures. Some of them where at the same day at the Charlmers susatainable day.
The exercises very very good and I learned a lot from them. Good to combinate theoretical with practical. Also very good with tow literature seminar (could even have 3, one in the very last end aswell)»
Lectures by ESA-people (Matty, Ulrika/indicators , Rickard/RA, Linus/EIA) 15 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 1 | | 6% |
75%» | | 5 | | 33% |
100%» | | 9 | | 60% |
Genomsnitt: 4.53 Guest lectures 15 svarande
0%» | | 1 | | 6% |
25%» | | 3 | | 20% |
50%» | | 3 | | 20% |
75%» | | 6 | | 40% |
100%» | | 2 | | 13% |
Genomsnitt: 3.33 Exercises, literature seminars 15 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 4 | | 26% |
100%» | | 11 | | 73% |
Genomsnitt: 4.73
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?15 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 2 | | 13% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 13 | | 86% |
Genomsnitt: 3.86 - Thanks to Matty!» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
- Very good and helpuful the learning outcomes at the end of each lecture.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
- Even mentioned on every lecture, that is very good.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.15 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 15 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?Both the written exam and the project report and presentation is part of the examination. Matrisfråga - The project was a bit beyond the abilities of the average members of the course. If a student had not seen these tools before or had any prior experience, the project would have been extremely difficult to carry out. Perhaps more guidance could be given.»
The written exam 15 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 6% |
Yes, definitely» | | 13 | | 86% |
I don» | | 1 | | 6% |
Genomsnitt: 3 The project 15 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 8 | | 53% |
Yes, definitely» | | 7 | | 46% |
I don» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.46
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?MatrisfrågaLectures by ESA-people (Matty, Ulrika/indicators , Rickard/RA, Linus/EIA) 15 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 13% |
Large extent» | | 7 | | 46% |
Great extent» | | 6 | | 40% |
Genomsnitt: 3.26 Guest lectures 15 svarande
Small extent» | | 5 | | 33% |
Some extent» | | 6 | | 40% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 20% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 6% |
Genomsnitt: 2 Exercises, literature seminars 15 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 6% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 33% |
Great extent» | | 9 | | 60% |
Genomsnitt: 3.53 Project 15 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 6% |
Some extent» | | 5 | | 33% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 33% |
Great extent» | | 4 | | 26% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?15 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 6% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 26% |
Large extent» | | 6 | | 40% |
Great extent» | | 4 | | 26% |
Genomsnitt: 2.86 - I found there is no need to read the compendium. To attend classes and study the slides (that are exhaustive and very well done) is enough to reach the learning goals of this course.» (Small extent)
- The literature was good, some was a little bit unneccessary, esecially the examples of some case studies, but sme students may perfer to read it for understanding aswell.» (Large extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?15 svarande
Very badly» | | 1 | | 6% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 5 | | 33% |
Very well» | | 9 | | 60% |
Genomsnitt: 3.46 - Some slides and the result for the exercises were a little bit to late. But when sending email to teachers, very quick responding. Good!» (Rather well)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?Matrisfråga- My group for the project was advised by Are, who sometimes (often) did not give clear answers or provide clear guidance. If he is unsure of how to proceed or how to answer our questions, he should wait until he can answer, instead of providing a roundabout answer, thus confusing the group even more.»
Lectures 15 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 6% |
Very good» | | 12 | | 80% |
I did not seek help» | | 2 | | 13% |
Genomsnitt: 4.06 Exercises, literature seminars 15 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 13% |
Very good» | | 13 | | 86% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.86 Project 15 svarande
Very poor» | | 2 | | 13% |
Rather poor» | | 1 | | 6% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 13% |
Very good» | | 10 | | 66% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.33 Non-scheduled hours 15 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 6% |
Very good» | | 8 | | 53% |
I did not seek help» | | 6 | | 40% |
Genomsnitt: 4.33 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?Matrisfråga- Very different ambitions levels in the project. Aslo different views of what should be/not be included in the report - even if we get nice syllabus (due to my opinion)»
Exercises, literature seminars 15 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 13% |
Very well» | | 12 | | 80% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 1 | | 6% |
Genomsnitt: 3.93 Project 15 svarande
Very poorly» | | 1 | | 6% |
Rather poorly» | | 3 | | 20% |
Rather well» | | 5 | | 33% |
Very well» | | 6 | | 40% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.06 11. How was the course workload?15 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 8 | | 53% |
High» | | 7 | | 46% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.46 - High = good!» (High)
12. How was the total workload this study period?15 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 6% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 33% |
High» | | 8 | | 53% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 6% |
Genomsnitt: 3.6 - Especially because of Matty"s opportunity to change the hand in date of the final project group that was initially scheduled in the same day of the exam of Technical Change and the Environment. » (Adequate)
- Together with technical change the first three weeks were CRAZY.. Maybe the exercises should be a bit more spread out. » (Too high)
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?15 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 13% |
Good» | | 10 | | 66% |
Excellent» | | 3 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 4.06 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Very meaningful to learn this tools and good with this "gruound course" before choosen the more detailed ones in different ESA tools.» (Excellent)
14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The excercises»
- Exercices
Project
Seminar»
- Exercises (Mini MFA, LCA & RA).
Project»
- matty»
- Assignments and project group are fundamental.»
- Everything - see above»
- Matty»
- the mini exercises»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The class should go more in depth and explain more about the tools. I understand that the class is an overview of the tools, but it feels perfunctory especially because most students will go on to take the LCA course etc.»
- Exercices for each ESA tool
One more seminar for exercices
»
- The project provided an adequate way to improve learning. But I think the topics of some of the projects were too detailed and were not good examples of projects to begin learning about ESA tools.
Simpler, clearer project topics could be used which would allow students to learn more about the ESA tools»
- »
- Literature seminar. It is better to substitute it with another assignment.»
- Not sure, but you might have to wish for the project and the ambitionlevel(because some projects seems to be more intrested due to my background than others), but also good to learn to cooperate with different people. So, I do not really know!»
- The Power-points (Mattys) - to much information! A bit confusing, better to focus more on major points? :) Otherwise great teaching! The "seminars" should have more structure (ex more "interactive" exercises like the one we did in Chemical RA? - that roleplay was really fun!)»
- The project, and the supervision of the project (are). You don´,t use what you have learned, the most you need for to do a good work is a good background from before. More clear information from the supervisor, should be same for all groups.»
16. Additional comments- Better supervision from Are»
- A very good course. Thank you Matty and others !»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.06
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.06 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.76
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|