ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Technology based entrepreneurship (Sahlgrenska), CIP016

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-13 - 2012-12-19
Antal svar: 2
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 9%
Kontaktperson: Anna Tullsten»

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

2 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»1 50%
At least 35 hours/week»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- Trying to combine group assignments, exam studies and individual assignments the average time spent ends up way past 35 hours per week.» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

2 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»2 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

- The lectures have been of high quality with some exceptions. I would have liked to have more lectures about business plans and important factors to consider from an investor perspective.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfillment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

2 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Except for the oral assignments where the instructions and learning criteria have been quite diffuse.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

2 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»2 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- There are a lot of assignments and thus the time required to complete them are much higher than in other educations. However the criteria for grading seems to be fair and the assignments are not impossible. There is one part though that I think is to difficult and that is the financial part, both the valuation assignment and the financial part in the business plan since I as a law student attend this education with no previous experience of calculating company value, sales, net profits, cash flows, rates of returns and so on and neither any experience of excel models, formulas and connections etc. » (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

2 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 50%
Yes, definitely»1 50%
I don’,t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- I thought the wide scope of the questions made it difficult to show my learning outcomes. With no previous experience in these kinds of exams it was hard to know what knowledge that was most important to include.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

2 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»1 50%
Great extent»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Engaged teachers and practical experienced lecturers provided a deeper understanding of the subjects.» (Great extent)

7. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

2 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 50%
Rather well»1 50%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- The administration is very eager to improve and is quick to adjust when a problem is brought to their attention. There are however a few more problems that need to be brought to their attention than I"d prefer.» (Rather badly)
- PingPong and distribution of assignments and gradings were a mess, every teacher put the documents in different places which made it hard to find and increased the risk of missing out on something important. » (Rather well)

Study climate

8. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

2 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 50%
Very good»1 50%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- The climate provided by the teachers and the other students are far beyond anything I"ve ever experienced in my previous education. Thanks to this I"ve been able to learn so much more, fantastic! » (Very good)

9. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

2 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 50%
Very well»1 50%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Same as the above comment, everyone contributes and there is nothing you can"t ask about» (Very well)

10. How was the course workload?

2 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»2 100%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Sometimes even too high since the group is very ambitious and so am I. It was difficult to draw the line» (High)

Specific parts of the course

11. How did you find the lectures on “,Cooperative content and contract”,?

5 is the highest grade.

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 100%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

12. How did you find the lecture and exercise on “,Learning styles”,?

5 is the highest grade.

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 50%
4»1 50%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

13. How did you find the lecture on “,Intercultural communication”,?

5 is the highest grade.

2 svarande

1»1 50%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»1 50%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

14. How did you find the lecture on “,Business plans”,?

5 is the highest grade.

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 100%
4»0 0%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- More practical examples!» (3)

15. How did you find the “,Pitching lecture”,?

5 is the highest grade.

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 100%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

16. How did you find the “,Pitching exercise”,?

5 is the highest grade.

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 100%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

17. How did you find the “,Business plan presentation”,?

5 is the highest grade.

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 100%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

18. How did you find the “,Negotiation lecture and exercise”,?

5 is the highest grade.

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»1 50%
5»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

19. How did you find the “,Shareholding and shareholders agreement”,?

5 is the highest grade.

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»1 50%
5»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

20. How did you find the “,Investor presentations and draft shareholders agreement”,?

5 is the highest grade.

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 50%
4»0 0%
5»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 4

21. How did you find the “,Investor negotiations”,?

5 is the highest grade.

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 100%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- to short» (4)

22. How did you find the lecture on “,Agreements”,?

5 is the highest grade.

2 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»1 50%
5»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

23. Which school seminars would you like to keep for next year?

2 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

Identity seminar (Kristina and Tomas)»0 0%
Social entrepreneurship (Kristina)»1 50%
Literature seminar (Tomas, Christoffer and Aslak)»1 50%
Business models for SE (Karl Palmås)»2 100%
Social entrepreneurship degunk and strategy (Christoffer)»2 100%
Examples of entrepreneurship for welfare (Ulf Petrusson)»1 50%
Corporate social responsibility (Karl Palmås)»1 50%
Discussion/wrap-up seminar (Tomas and Kristina)»0 0%

Summarizing questions

24. What is your general impression of the course?

2 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»1 50%
Excellent»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

25. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Shareholders negotiation! »

26. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Seminar series! more perspectives needed, not only positive ones»

27. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från