Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Technology based entrepreneurship, CIP016
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-12-13 - 2012-12-19 Antal svar: 6 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 14% Kontaktperson: Anna Tullsten»
1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.6 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 2 | | 33% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 16% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 3 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.16 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?6 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 0 | | 0% |
100%» | | 6 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 5
Goals and goal fulfillmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?6 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 1 | | 16% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 4 | | 66% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 2.83 - It"s not always easy to understand the goals before one actually complete the assignments.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.5 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 4 | | 80% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 1 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 2.2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?5 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, definitely» | | 5 | | 100% |
I don’,t know/have not been examined yet» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?6 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 33% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 2.83 7. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?6 svarande
Very badly» | | 1 | | 16% |
Rather badly» | | 1 | | 16% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 66% |
Very well» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - there has been mass confusion about how the grade is set» (Very badly)
- Sometimes it was a great delay for the pp-presentations or assignment instructions to actually be posted on pingpong. » (Rather well)
Study climate8. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?6 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very good» | | 6 | | 100% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 9. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?6 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 1 | | 16% |
Very well» | | 5 | | 83% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.83 - Learning from my fellow classmates have been essential for my learning!» (Very well)
10. How was the course workload?6 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 33% |
High» | | 4 | | 66% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66
Specific parts of the course11. How did you find the lectures on “,Cooperative content and contract”,?5 is the highest grade.5 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 20% |
3» | | 1 | | 20% |
4» | | 3 | | 60% |
5» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.4 - do not remember» (?)
12. How did you find the lecture and exercise on “,Learning styles”,?5 is the highest grade.6 svarande
1» | | 1 | | 16% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 0 | | 0% |
4» | | 4 | | 66% |
5» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 - Provocative, and gave me an eureka moment in the end. Brilliant and really something to keep!» (4)
13. How did you find the lecture on “,Intercultural communication”,?5 is the highest grade.6 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 16% |
3» | | 4 | | 66% |
4» | | 0 | | 0% |
5» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 3.16 - A bit fuzzy, but good overview.» (3)
14. How did you find the lecture on “,Business plans”,?5 is the highest grade.6 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 2 | | 33% |
4» | | 2 | | 33% |
5» | | 2 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4 - They tried to make it all clear, but as student, I wasn"t ready to really understand the task, fact book and my limitations.» (3)
15. How did you find the “,Pitching lecture”,?5 is the highest grade.6 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 16% |
3» | | 1 | | 16% |
4» | | 2 | | 33% |
5» | | 2 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3.83 - Valuable, but perhaps it would have worked even better if Boo had a more visible sidekick?» (4)
16. How did you find the “,Pitching exercise”,?5 is the highest grade.6 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 16% |
3» | | 1 | | 16% |
4» | | 0 | | 0% |
5» | | 4 | | 66% |
Genomsnitt: 4.16 - Didn"t prepare that much, mostly because I don"t think it"s so difficult to hold a presentation.» (3)
17. How did you find the “,Business plan presentation”,?5 is the highest grade.6 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 1 | | 16% |
4» | | 3 | | 50% |
5» | | 2 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4.16 18. How did you find the “,Negotiation lecture and exercise”,?5 is the highest grade.6 svarande
1» | | 1 | | 16% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 2 | | 33% |
4» | | 1 | | 16% |
5» | | 2 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - do not get why we did not had one with both this one and Business plan presentation» (1)
19. How did you find the “,Shareholding and shareholders agreement”,?5 is the highest grade.6 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 2 | | 33% |
4» | | 3 | | 50% |
5» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 3.83 20. How did you find the “,Investor presentations and draft shareholders agreement”,?5 is the highest grade.6 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 2 | | 33% |
4» | | 3 | | 50% |
5» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 3.83 - It was clear what the task, purpose and goal were for the first presentation but this second meeting, it was first on the meeting we realized what the investors wanted to know. Clarify more before?» (3)
21. How did you find the “,Investor negotiations”,?5 is the highest grade.6 svarande
1» | | 1 | | 16% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 2 | | 33% |
4» | | 1 | | 16% |
5» | | 2 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - It was never communicated how important the draft was for the negotiations. The only negative feedback we got, which lead to a 7 in grade, was a thin draft. Information that everything that is going to be discussed should be in the draft came up on ping pong as an answer to a question from a student, AFTER we sent ours in. Not cool, not fair.» (1)
- ok but they did not really know what we had talked about previously. was no real negotiation....» (3)
22. How did you find the lecture on “,Agreements”,?5 is the highest grade.6 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 16% |
3» | | 3 | | 50% |
4» | | 1 | | 16% |
5» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 3.33 - Should have been before the draft.» (2)
- Mainly basic info that I"ve learned before.» (3)
23. Which school seminars would you like to keep for next year?6 svarande(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
Identity seminar (Kristina and Tomas)» | | 2 | | 33% |
Social entrepreneurship (Kristina)» | | 4 | | 66% |
Literature seminar (Tomas, Christoffer and Aslak)» | | 5 | | 83% |
Business models for SE (Karl Palmås)» | | 1 | | 16% |
Social entrepreneurship degunk and strategy (Christoffer)» | | 2 | | 33% |
Examples of entrepreneurship for welfare (Ulf Petrusson)» | | 4 | | 66% |
Corporate social responsibility (Karl Palmås)» | | 3 | | 50% |
Discussion/wrap-up seminar (Tomas and Kristina)» | | 4 | | 66% |
Summarizing questions24. What is your general impression of the course?6 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 3 | | 50% |
Excellent» | | 3 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.5 25. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- pitching and negotiations»
- The overall plan is excellent, the red thread is clear and the group assignments vital for learning outcomes.»
26. What should definitely be changed to next year?- a clear grading method»
- The seminars. »
- Clarify with lecturers in forehand about assignments, their extent and value for the education. Post info on time, it"s not useful if the info reaches the students a few hours enforce deadline.»
27. Additional comments
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|