ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Design of Technological Innovations and Markets, Sahlgrenska, MED984

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-13 - 2012-12-19
Antal svar: 3
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 13%
Kontaktperson: Anna Tullsten»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

3 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»1 33%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

3 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»3 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

3 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 100%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- adstract concepts and abstract goals» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

3 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»2 66%
No, the goals are set too high»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

3 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 66%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»1 33%
Some extent»1 33%
Large extent»1 33%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- The lectures were too squeezed-not enough time to cover,understand the material» (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 66%
Great extent»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

3 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 66%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- A lot of misunderstandings, cancellations of hand-ins, when the hand-in is already handed in-poor administration.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

3 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 66%
Very good»1 33%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

3 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 66%
Very well»1 33%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- groupwork is the only effective on this course.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 33%
High»2 66%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

12. How was the total workload this study period?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 33%
High»1 33%
Too high»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 33%
Adequate»1 33%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- worse than I expected. not worth time and money invested.» (Fair)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The way the exam questions are written. they need to be more structured and clearer.»
- attitute of the teachers, evaluation criteria and a lot of things could be done better.»

16. Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.33

Lectures

Appreciate on a scale 1 (low appreciation) - 5 (high appreciation) the combined competency and pedagogy of the following lecturers:

17. Mats Lundqvist

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 66%
4»0 0%
5»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- at first it is very interesting to listen to him. but after several lectures you understand that things he explains could be explained much easier in several sentences. too much blah-blah, abstract lectures. the only helpful things were the cases discussions. sometimes lectures seemed just an awful waste of time» (3)

18. Marine Agogue

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 33%
4»1 33%
5»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

- ok» (4)

19. Anders Sundelin

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»0 0%
5»3 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

- very nice teacher, gave life examples» (5)

20. Gregory Carson

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»2 66%
5»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

- after his lectures I had a passion to take the finance book and read it through» (5)

21. Per Hultén

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 33%
4»2 66%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- ok» (4)

22. Jonas Mårtensson

3 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»1 33%
4»2 66%
5»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- ok» (4)

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.33
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.58

Kursutvärderingssystem från