Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

TD LP2 12/13 Cognitiv ergonomics MPP036

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-02-04
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 35%
Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Teknisk design 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»2 18%
Around 25 hours/week»3 27%
Around 30 hours/week»3 27%
At least 35 hours/week»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- More in the end...» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 36%
100%»7 63%

Genomsnitt: 4.63

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 9%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 36%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- The goals are reasonable but the number of assignments are too many... » (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- Intense but good.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 44%
Yes, definitely»5 55%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

- The report felt like it examined the goals, but the final presentation did not seem that serious.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»4 36%
Large extent»5 45%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

- Some lectures explained how to pursue some methods. Otherwise I think I have learned most from the project.» (Some extent)
- The lectures only gave a short overview of the knowledge found in the literature, which IMO makes them useless. If instead new or different information was presented it becomes less pointless to go to lectures.» (Some extent)
- Could have used more help and guidance concerning the methods we were supposed to use. » (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 18%
Large extent»8 72%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Much of the articles that were handed out did not seem to fit our project, and contained much information that we already know. » (Some extent)
- The articles were good but it did not feel neccessary to print out all of them - waste of paper. It is more easy to search in a pdf.» (Large extent)
- See above» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 45%
Very well»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- The printed course literature could be of better quality. (Bigger text on the papers) » (Rather well)
- Confusing naming on Pingpong. Better organisation of the files (e.g. related to which assignment number, lecture date or similar) would improve the overview» (Rather well)
- Would like the course material, all handouts, to be digital » (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 18%
Very good»8 72%
I did not seek help»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Lars-Ola was of great help.» (Very good)
- Fast and very informative help! » (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 9%
Rather well»2 18%
Very well»8 72%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- Uncooperative project partner. » (Rather poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 18%
High»5 45%
Too high»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 4.18

- Should be made more clear in the beginning if the goal is 40 or 140 pages in the report (heard of many different versions)» (Adequate)
- Mostly due to that we had to get a hold of operators.» (High)
- Too many assignments in the project work... Plus the individual home exam. Didn"t have time to actually dig deep into anything, everything had to be made rather quickly since there wasn"t enough time and ever assignment was very time consuming... » (High)
- The project required us to perform too many methods and because of the time constraint, it sometimes felt that we had to perform methods that we yet did not fully understand. Also some methods did not fit our project, and it was therefore quite difficult to perform them. » (High)
- One of the most intense courses I have had» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 9%
High»7 63%
Too high»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 4.18

- High, or too high. Running this course together with design for experience was quite a challenge!» (High)
- Mostly because I was forced to take extra courses (140% study intensity) due to poor planing of my programme in terms of integrating students from outside of Chalmes» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»3 27%
Adequate»1 9%
Good»6 54%
Excellent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.45 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- There were too many articles handed out, and some did not provide that much new knowledge that we did not possess already. Some lectures also seemed unnecessary, for instance the first lecture, the lecture about systems and the one about emotions. » (Fair)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The Project»
- The project.»
- Great to work in groups of three. »
- I think the project is good to allow students to perform different mehtods, however it should be more optional when choosing methods to perform. I think it would be better if we were allowed to choose the methods that fits our project.»
- The project, presentations and guest lectures must be preserved. »
- Good that all the methods did not need to be explained in the report, that cut down on the workload, the way we did it in the home exam was good. Quite short. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The project has very high workload. This must be set realistically. The course goals can e achieved with lesser workload as well.»
- Fewer groups with more varied projects so that you learn more from each other.»
- The number of assignments. Need better lectures and method guidance. Too much to do in the end... Page limits to each assignment of the project report!»
- Remove the hand-in tasks, or grade them. They do not serve any purpose since it was explained to us, during the end of the course, it was only to make sure that everyone possessed adequate knowledge from start. Instead the course administrator and examinor should regard the entry requirements for taking the course. That should be enough. Remove the final home exam. This did not serve any purpose at all. Even if the purpose was to ensure that everyone participated in all project parts, the home exam did not ensure this since everyone can easily reflect upon methods and theories without actually having read them. I understand that it is desired to have some part that is individual, but then this should be graded as well.»
- Final presentation could be conducted a little earlier in the year. »
- Mainly good, but the design for experience course and this course should be harmonized. There was double course litterature and the courses could really benefit from being run either more separatelly or more close together. Please add a maximum number of pages. Like "three pages for each task" or something like that»

16. Additional comments

- Mention in the beginning that the intention of the course is to make is familiar with the methods and their pros/conts. Especially to prevent people from spending a lot of time and emotion on a method that does not give a lot to the final outcome»
- Think about the final presentations, I think something should be done to make it more interesting for you, for the audience, and for the presenters... Now it is just another step to go through, nothing to look forward to»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.45

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.45
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.61

Kursutvärderingssystem från