Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

TD LP2 12/13 Design for experience PPU180

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-21 - 2013-02-04
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 37%
Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»5 31%
Around 25 hours/week»6 37%
Around 30 hours/week»2 12%
At least 35 hours/week»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 6%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 18%
100%»12 75%

Genomsnitt: 4.62

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

16 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 12%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 25%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 62%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- It is argued in order to get a 5, the knowledge should extend the one that is provided during the course in terms of lectures and course literature (or at least this was the demand for Assignmen 2). This seems very hard to achieve, I do not know how it is possible.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- In the exercises, partically 1, it could be clearer what is supposed to go into the report (for ex. interview guide)» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»14 93%
No, the goals are set too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

15 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 20%
Yes, definitely»11 73%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.86

- Though my home exam has not been handed in yet, I do believe from how the questions were posed that they cover much of the content of the course.» (Yes, definitely)
- I liked that the hand-ins were so short! It forces one to really think about the content of each paragraph, or sentence. And it makes it managable to write and actually be good» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»2 12%
Some extent»5 31%
Large extent»7 43%
Great extent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.56

- Some lectures were more interesting than relevant.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 12%
Large extent»12 75%
Great extent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The articles used in assignment 1 were useful as the helped on the home exam, but the books suggested were not as useful.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 6%
Rather well»8 50%
Very well»7 43%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- late comments on work and grade due to technichal problems with pingping...» (Rather badly)
- Could have been better. There were some mishaps, (for example one important article being handed out very late, which resulted in unnecessary confusion) » (Rather well)
- Some important material was handed out a little late due to home exam. » (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

16 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 6%
Rather good»7 43%
Very good»8 50%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

16 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 12%
Rather well»3 18%
Very well»11 68%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.56

- Great difference between the assignments. It was not so good to be 8 people on such a small assignment so many took the opportunity and did as little as possible while others did both the analysis and the presentation...» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 25%
High»11 68%
Too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- it would probably have been adequate if the workload in the other course I had taken in this period had been lower, but now I really felt it in both courses. » (High)
- It is a course with high workload, and as it is a very academical course in a new language the work is high. After the first (intense) exercise the class felt spent, and had a hard time managing to start with the second one.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 31%
High»6 37%
Too high»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 4

- High or too high. We had cognitive ergonomics at the same time, and having those courses run together is a bit rough» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 18%
Good»11 68%
Excellent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.93 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Could be more organized concerning content for next year. It felt a bit "jumpy" now.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Assignment 2»
- Assignment 2.»
- the examination ,with 2 assignments and homeexam, was excellent. The study visit to SIK should also be preserved. »
- the group work in assignment 2»
- The second assignment, guest lectures, study visit»
- The course subject is very interesting, the layout was quite good for a "new" course. Field trip was a good extra.»
- I liked the dutch guy! And that you showed, through the externals, that there are a lot of different things one can work with, within this field.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The lecture about sound was not interesting.»
- The purpose of the assignments in class should be clearer and assignment 1 should be changed - smaller groups and maybe some kind of discussion circles instead of presentations.»
- Better information about cancelled lectures and better prepared/relevant workshops. »
- some of the lectures were unfocused and repetetive, for example the workshops with Jessica where there was no time left for reflection and learning. Also, it was hard to know where to focus the reading of the course litterature, as it was a bit to much to read within the timeframe. »
- Maybe the course should not focus on only a few theories/methods and dig deep into them, but rather explain a few more theories and methods so we learn a bigger spectrum of methods to choose to use later in the future. »
- Feedback and grades need to be returned quicker!»
- Some of the lectures weren"t well prepared and delivered.»
- getting feedback on the first assignment before the second assignment needs to be handed in »
- minor tweaking in the planing. Workshops were time consuming and render very little or no benefits. Poorly organized except for the one with the "paper bags" with was interesting and prepared.»
- I think it should be harmonized with cognitive ergonomics. We had some double course litterature (which lowered the task a bit, thankfully) so that they are either more alike, or more different. It was a bit confusing as it was. The final presentation was good, but I think that "lessons learned" should be "what mistakes did you do and how did you correct them" rather than "what are the main conclusions from the experiment" »

16. Additional comments

- Merry Christmas!»
- Very interesting course overall, but very much thery instead of practical experience and testing.»
- The first exercise was very intense, the deadline in lv 2/3. It was hard to take in the material given from the course and analyize it.»
- Really great course. Had a lot of fun and learnt alot!»
- Its a very high theoretichally based course. It would perhaps advance if more practical lectures and assignments were added. »
- There is a lack of uniform standard in grading of the reports. This MUST change. There is very limited feedback. And the feedback received is too late.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.93

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.93
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.73

Kursutvärderingssystem från