ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

TD LP2 12/13 Advanced form design 1 MPP111

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-02-04
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36%
Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Teknisk design 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»4 44%
Around 25 hours/week»4 44%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 11%
100%»8 88%

Genomsnitt: 4.88

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»3 33%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 11%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 55%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 37%
Yes, definitely»5 62%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»3 33%
Some extent»2 22%
Large extent»3 33%
Great extent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

- there was not much feedbacking at all.. so more of that please» (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»1 11%
Some extent»5 55%
Large extent»3 33%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»2 22%
Rather badly»2 22%
Rather well»3 33%
Very well»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

- This course is poorly administred. There are always coming up new exercises that are hard to plan for beforehand since they are not mentioned anywhere. » (Very badly)
- Unfortunately, the information flow in this course was not very good. Information where often sent out very late and information given was often different depending on who you asked or what source you looked at. » (Rather badly)
- Some confusions sometimes, but they were solved» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»3 33%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 22%
Very good»3 33%
I did not seek help»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- Opportunities for asking questions are very important, and that worked very well. I think I got very much out of asking questions. » (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 22%
Very well»7 77%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- Unfortunately, many of the students were mad about a lot in this course. That was very sad because in order to maintain a good course everyone have to contribute. » (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 11%
Adequate»3 33%
High»4 44%
Too high»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- In a good way! It was an even workload. » (High)
- very high expectations and poor instructions and help don"t get along» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 11%
Adequate»3 33%
High»4 44%
Too high»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- the course i took besides the advanced form was as much work as afd1.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»3 33%
Fair»1 11%
Adequate»1 11%
Good»1 11%
Excellent»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- There are no supports for the students. This course would benefit from individual dialogies between student and teacher.» (Poor)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Weekly diaries and all the assignments»
- Weekly visual and verbal diaries»
- Trip Clay and paper workshop, the exercise would however need to be clarified.»
- Study visit to lidköping, lecture by eva hild»
- the paper workshop, but take it later in the course, not the beginning»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The way information is communicated. The biggest weakness of this course was the information and feedback given about the assignments. It is not OK to e-mail specifications about the assignments or presentations the evening before they are supposed to be carried out. Then it"s impossible to follow those specifications anyway. Also the feedback given on the assignments was bad. To say "look at your classmates work" is not a good way to give feedback, mainly because it"s very hard to know which classmate"s work are considered good enough to look at. The examinator thought that the form analysis assignment had very bad results. I think the reason for this wasn"t only the class, but also the way the information about the assignment was communicated. The class obviously didn"t understand the assignment. »
- Please get better with the information flow. In particullar regarding the weekly handins, that caused a lot of stress. »
- Communcation and administration. How critisism is handled. Be more clear on what is positive, we are still unsure.»
- Intro lecture before paper workshop ( or more explanation to it)»
- more feedback, more time for help, more teachers (preferrably both the examinator and the responsible teacher)»

16. Additional comments

- I really liked this course, but it needs more communication between teachers and students. Too many misunderstandings ruin the mood of the class, which strikes back on the course. »
- This is a course where you feel very extradited. In most of our cases, we haven"t worked in this way before. And because of this we need more support than art students. As the exercises are wauge and without guidaness as well as the critism in some cases not are exemplified, we feel more exposed. »
- Great course»
- A good course with great things to teach, but needs improvement in clearing. With clear instructions, creativity follows a lot easier. »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.5

Kursutvärderingssystem från