Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPWPS 1213-2 Wireless link project, MCC125

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-02-03
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 65%
Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

15 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 6%
Around 20 hours/week»2 13%
Around 25 hours/week»5 33%
Around 30 hours/week»4 26%
At least 35 hours/week»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 13%
50%»2 13%
75%»2 13%
100%»9 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

15 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 6%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»10 66%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- Since this course was new and project based learning all the goals were clear and/or measurable.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»14 93%
No, the goals are set too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

- Lack of instrumentation to effectively achieve the goals.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 42%
Yes, definitely»8 57%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- Of course the final assessment didn"t show all the troubleshooting that was made during the course. And this was a big part of the course. » (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»3 20%
Some extent»9 60%
Large extent»3 20%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- As already pointed of to the responsible, the help given was not sufficient.» (Small extent)
- The lectures didn"t really help us when facing real-world problems.» (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»3 20%
Some extent»10 66%
Large extent»2 13%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.93

- The information about the soldering and were we could do it was insufficient. » (Small extent)
- There was no course book but lectures were useful.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

15 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»4 26%
Rather well»9 60%
Very well»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.86

- The box was not maybe my favorite sharing tool, but once you got it, it was OK. » (Rather badly)
- Needs better structure in the beginning of the course, otherwise ok.» (Rather badly)
- Lecture note should be uploaded early» (Rather well)
- Sharing the course material through the Box (synchronised file sharing client drive for computers, smart phone and online) was excellent idea. » (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor»2 13%
Rather poor»4 26%
Rather good»7 46%
Very good»2 13%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- As we were told in the end there were various reasons why we didn"t get the help that we needed. But at least these reasons could have been communicated to us, so that we could have some more understanding.» (Very poor)
- Poor availability of the TAs» (Rather poor)
- Consultations vere cancelled for a couple of times. The TAs could answer e-mails fasters» (Rather poor)
- TA"s were almost never there, teachers were hard to reach. Needs improvement.» (Rather poor)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 6%
Rather well»4 26%
Very well»10 66%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Too many students in one team. Someone only did a little» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 42%
High»8 57%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- To high in the end. PCBs arrived too late» (?)
- Sharper deadlines in the beginning would ease the workload in the end. » (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 46%
High»8 53%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- High, but in some way enjoyable.» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»5 33%
Good»8 53%
Excellent»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.8 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Due to the fact that we were some kind of lab rats, the course was not really what I had expected. I think though that the course has got a lot of potential to be really valuable. If consideration is taken to all the course feedback, then this could be a quite excellent course in every aspect. I will take with me a great deal of experience from this course. » (Adequate)
- The potential is there but there were lots of "start-up" hick-ups. It will probably be a excellent course next year though! Don"t cancel it - it is a very important course in our masters program me. There should be more practical courses like this one.» (Adequate)
- The idea of the course is good, but the execution needs some improvements.» (Adequate)
- Many improvements can be done and have been suggested.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The course is really interesting and stimulating»
- The concept. »
- the team concept»
- Hands on experience with wireless communications. Guest lectures are good.»
- The idea»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- See all the suggestions given directly to the teacher. Mainly related to the lack of tools and instruments.»
- - More lab equipment. - More lab space. - More accessible TAs. - Earlier PCB deadline. - ......»
- Six students per team at most. Could give us a lecture about usrp, we cost too much time on connecting usrp at first.»
- PCB deadline. Lectures earlier!»
- Please add some introduction tutorial with GNU Radio devices. The devices are not so well preserved and classified after this course. Students should take care of devices during the project. Should be better if there are some hardware design tutorials, for instance PCB design.»
- Some administrative stuff.»

16. Additional comments

- I think Kristoffer has got a pretty good idea of what needs to be changed.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.8

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.8
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.7

Kursutvärderingssystem från