Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Molecular electronics, MCC075, MPMIC, VT2008, MCC075

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-03-10 - 2008-04-06
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 62%
Kontaktperson: Jörgen Blennow»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 50%
Around 20 hours/week»4 40%
Around 25 hours/week»1 10%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.6

- Perhaps introduce tasks every week?» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 10%
75%»3 30%
100%»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- I have an overfull schedule, but I would have attended all lecture, had I had the time.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 70%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 10%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 90%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

- It"s a question of what character you want the course to have. The first half felt like an overview and if that is the purpose it"s fine, you could put in "heavier" stuff in that part» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 40%
Yes, definitely»3 30%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Unbalanced exam. 4p for long calculations and 3p for simple fact questions. Should be more points on calculations or more short questions with less points each.» (To some extent)
- the part on quantum mechanics was quite big» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 30%
Large extent»6 60%
Great extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Thorvald & Sergey: too many slides! Put more focus on some things on the board.» (Some extent)
- The first half, the teaching was good. The second half it was EXCELLENT, one of the best lecturer I"ve had during my 5 years. To do all derivations at the blackboard AND put them in neatly typed electronic format on the web page is, in my opinion, the PERFECT way to teach that kind of material. Deriving equations is best done on the blackboard, but it"s always nice to have a neatly written copy available (that is also free from mistakes). Also great in case you miss a lecture. So, if Tomas is giving the course next year as well, it will absolutely be appreciated if he wants to put that much effort into it again. Nice!» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»3 30%
Some extent»3 30%
Large extent»4 40%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- Some supporting text (not only papers!) would make the slides more useful after the lecture. » (Small extent)
- Regarding the slides, see my last answer. As for the recommended reading, it has not be a must to actually read it, but it is appreciated that tips are supplied where we can find more information.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 20%
Rather well»5 50%
Very well»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- All events should be clear at the start of the course. Webpage worked fine.» (Rather badly)
- In principle everything is as it should. Would it be possible to link to the course home page from Studieportalen?» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 10%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»8 80%
I did not seek help»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- All help needed was provided.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 40%
Very well»6 60%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- On the few occasions when it was needed, it has worked flawlessly.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 30%
Adequate»5 50%
High»2 20%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Quite relaxing.» (Low)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 10%
Adequate»2 20%
High»5 50%
Too high»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- But I also study too much...» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 30%
Good»6 60%
Excellent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- One of the best and most interesting courses I"ve had.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Tomas and the way he lectures.»
- different teachers give different lectures in their field.»
- extra speakers»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Perhaps some more details in the first half. Not too much though, it"s nice to keep bits of the "overview" feeling.»
- the handout lecture should be clearer, not just pictures and equations»
- More in-depth calculations/theory for some selected devices (Thorvald & Sergey)»
- maybe more theoretic, excercises»
- more homework problems, exercise lectures»

16. Additional comments

- Thank you!»
- Maybe introduce some kind of laboration for next year? Some STM/molecule conductance lab? Just an idea.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från