Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPSOF 1213-2 Software product line engineering, DAT165|DIT275

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-02-03
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 53%
Kontaktperson: Börje Johansson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

15 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 6%
Around 20 hours/week»7 46%
Around 25 hours/week»5 33%
Around 30 hours/week»1 6%
At least 35 hours/week»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- Team work has large workload and lasts about 7 weeks.» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 13%
75%»5 33%
100%»8 53%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

- The teaching must be improved. Antonio Martini seemed unsure and shy in his teaching. Additionally, he should improve his teaching methods by making the lectures more fun, they were extremely boring and were making me sleepy.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

15 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand»1 11%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 44%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 44%
I have not seen/read the goals»6

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- Its impossible to know anything about the course goals since all information about this course its just a mess. the teacher doesnt seem to have a clue and makes them up along with the course » (The goals are difficult to understand)
- Not presented to the class. No course PM was available either (required by Chalmers policy).» (I have not seen/read the goals)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- cant unselect....» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 50%
Yes, definitely»6 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- One of few positive things» (To some extent)
- I have no idea» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»6 40%
Some extent»5 33%
Large extent»4 26%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.86

- The assigned teacher was very bad. His English was not good enough for a being a teacher or teacher aid. This lead to bad lectures and absurdly bad discussions. However, the examinator (Jan Bosch), who made two guest appearances was good. But he is also responsible for the bad quality of the rest of the course since he assigned this PhD student to be our "teacher".» (Small extent)
- Very vague and the english during the lecture did not meet it"s expected standard» (Small extent)
- The only good lectures where the one with Jan bosch and they where kind of hard to fit into the course since all other lectures were really bad.» (Small extent)
- Only the lectures by Jan Bosch were understandable.» (Small extent)
- The content of the lectures was interesting and helpful but the manner of teaching should be improved as I mentioned earlier.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»4 26%
Some extent»1 6%
Large extent»7 46%
Great extent»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- The course book is probably good but its lacking content and is just alot of buzzwords. The course doesnt seem to be connected to the book even though it refers to it» (Small extent)
- Large, compared to the teacher.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

15 svarande

Very badly»3 20%
Rather badly»2 13%
Rather well»7 46%
Very well»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- Oh my god.. DONT USE WIKISPACES. everything about this course its just a mess.. i dont have a clue about anything in this course.. its hard to say if the wikispaces page is up to date or if it is from last year. » (Very badly)
- It was very unclear, what and how to do things? Also what the purpose of certain tasks were.» (Rather badly)
- Wiki was OK, but please use PingPong instead. PingPong can do all of the things we used the wiki for (I believe).» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor»1 6%
Rather poor»2 13%
Rather good»9 60%
Very good»3 20%
I did not seek help»0

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- You could ask questions, you could get answers, but not always were they connected to the question you asked.» (Very poor)
- The assigned teacher and a teacher aid was present at our "workshops" but they were both really bad at explaining and to answer questions. A lot of the time we did not understand what say said or meant. They both gave the feeling of not being competent at all of the course content (lets hope that was not the case...).» (Rather poor)
- There was opportunities to ask question, however, to get a clear and informative answer was almost impossible.» (Rather poor)
- It was easy to ask questions but not to get an answer. The teacher never had to exact answer and had to check with someone (jan?) all the time. Sometimes when we asked what he wanted he just answered "whatever you feel like" » (Rather good)
- Sometimes, the teacher seemed unsure when answering our questions.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 6%
Rather well»7 46%
Very well»7 46%
I did not seek cooperation»0

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- Some students in our group did not contribute their part to the hand-ins, forcing the rest of us to redo the work to be adequate. This resulted in some strains in the group and finally the removal of a member from the group.» (Rather well)
- Six people in a group to write a report is too much! Please out a limit of four people next year. Yes, it will cause more work for the TAs but it was not giving at all for us to work in groups of six for this kind of work.» (Rather well)
- Team members are friendly and have good ability to study. We collaborate very well.» (Very well)
- Through discussions managed to learn something in the end.» (Very well)
- Except a problem we had with one of the group members who did not work at all and ended up being eliminated from the team, I worked in a great team and the cooperation between us lead to us learning a lot and doing a great job.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 6%
Adequate»9 60%
High»5 33%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

- Weekly hand-ins which consumed some time. Felt that it was OK. We were practicing course content during most of the period.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

15 svarande

Too low»1 6%
Low»2 13%
Adequate»6 40%
High»5 33%
Too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- Compared to our hectic P1.» (Low)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor»5 33%
Fair»1 6%
Adequate»2 13%
Good»7 46%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.73 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Would not recommend anyone to take this course. By the book or study SPL on the internet instead.» (Poor)
- It felt that Bosch should have done the lecture instead of his PhD student that did not know enough about the subject.» (Poor)
- A really bad course, everything sucked. At this state i would recommend my fellow students to read something else, anything else. The subject is interesting and relevant to my education but the course need to be restructured. » (Poor)
- Teach knowledge of software product line through lectures, the company case study and the team work.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The exam. Was a very good and well designed exam!»
- team work, assignment, company case study and lectures.»
- The BAPO-framwork, the lectures with Bosch that was very good.»
- Jan Bosch"s guest lectures»
- The case study»
- The instructors are very helpful. The hands on teaching style makes it less work to do before the written exams.»
- Jan Bosch"s lecture were very interesting and inspiring, although his slide were quite difficult to understand. I hope that next year gets the chance to have lectures with him as well as he knows a lot of the area.»
- The project which was definitely helpful in learning the SPLE aspects should be preserved to next year.»
- the way of teaching »
- The assignments were pretty good and helped the learning»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The assigned teacher. Please remove him from teaching or put him in "teacher training" and an English course. The size of the project groups.»
- None.»
- The questions and assignment needs to be definied clearer, the purpose of the course should better respond to the task done during the course.»
- The teacher should be more motivated! "What do you think?" is not an adequate answer to questions!»
- The teacher, the information, the structure of the weekly hand ins. The information about exam, Seriously.. everything.. This course is not enough for a masters course»
- N/A»
- It was not until I had done the exam that I actually got a sense of what the course really was about and what aspects of the course that were important to learn. I think that the different parts of the course (the case study, the lectures etc) should be more focused on presenting what knowledge that is important for us to know. As it was now, almost all the effort I put in this course was laid on the case study and doing the Family evaluation framework. But knowing those things were only a little part of the whole course, yet they seemed to be the most important parts. The lectures didn"t feel so good to me. The guest lectures were great but the normal lectures seemed like the weren"t properly rehearsed, and the presentation lacked any sense of inspiration and motivation to me. As such I never put much effort into learning what had been said during the lectures as they didn"t seem important. To me they seemed like the kind of information a lecturer might present to an interested student, but which is not really any information that is going to be required on the exam... Or sort of. I hope you can understand what I mean. This is probably why I felt that the course never gave me a good vision of what Spoftware Product Line engineering is about, and what knowledge is important to carry with you when you graduate.»
- The teaching methods should definitely be changed to next year.»
- the structure exam»

16. Additional comments

- I think it was poor judgment and disrespectful of Jan Bosch to assign this PhD student to the course. The guy (PhD student), obviously, did not want to be there and his teaching was beyond bad. Add to this his bad English skills and you have complete failure. Mr Bosch must have known this on forehand, and that angers me. Easily the worst course I have taken at the SE Master.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.73

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.73
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.43

Kursutvärderingssystem från