ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPWPS 1213-2 Fiber optical communication, MCC100

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-02-03
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 38%
Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 12%
Around 20 hours/week»3 37%
Around 25 hours/week»4 50%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

8 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 12%
50%»2 25%
75%»3 37%
100%»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 12%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 87%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 12%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 87%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»1 12%
To some extent»2 25%
Yes, definitely»3 37%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 25%
Large extent»4 50%
Great extent»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3

7. How would you grade the lectures by Pontus Johannisson?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 12%
Good»7 87%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.87 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Good lectures, maybe a little to much info on every slide, but on the other hand the slides are a good complement to the book and also a good review for the exam.» (Good)

8. How would you grade the tutorials by Samuel Olsson?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 25%
Good»6 75%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I would appreciate a little more discussion about the problems solved and the methods used, why they are important and what we are supposed to learn from them.» (Adequate)
- Good tutorials, which gave a good intro to how to calculate and think of the problems. I like the tutorstyle where the TA solves problems, rather than solving problems myself in class. I can do that by myself anytime...» (Good)

9. How would you grade lab exercise 1?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 12%
Adequate»1 12%
Good»4 50%
Excellent»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.87 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Instructive, but crowded...» (Good)

10. How would you grade lab exercise 2?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 25%
Good»5 62%
Excellent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.87 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Its a little too much tweeking on the BER measurments, especially when the optimal sample point is moving in time...» (Good)
- Adjusting the decision point was very hard for beginners, so it took a lot of time while not being very interesting, especielly not for those just watching the student doing it.» (Good)

11. How would you grade the home assignments?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»4 50%
Good»3 37%
Excellent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.62 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The judging was to hard» (Adequate)
- Too difficult for us. We cost many time to do it, but can"t get bonus point. » (Adequate)
- They really get you start calculating. A good way to learn for the exam.» (Excellent)

12. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 37%
Large extent»5 62%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

- Mosly the slides. » (Some extent)
- I didn"t use the book very much, but the printed lecture notes and lab PM:s where very helpful.» (Some extent)

13. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 62%
Very well»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- I like the repetition of the self-test.» (Rather well)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.8

Study climate

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 25%
Very good»6 75%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 25%
Rather well»2 25%
Very well»3 37%
I did not seek cooperation»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

16. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 87%
High»1 12%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

17. How was the total workload this study period?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 37%
High»5 62%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

Summarizing questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 12%
Adequate»2 25%
Good»3 37%
Excellent»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Good overview of the field of optical communication.» (Good)

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Almost every course materials + pingpong tests, and teaching quality!»
- The home assignments.»
- The labs.»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The rule of correcting home assignment should be changled.»

21. Additional comments

- The rule of correcting the exam can"t be the same as home assignment . It is too strict.»
- Good course with interesting content.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.75
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.79
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.69

Kursutvärderingssystem från