Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Active microwave circuits, EME101, MPMPE, VT2008, EME101
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2008-03-10 - 2008-04-07 Antal svar: 13 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 76% Kontaktperson: Jörgen Blennow» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.13 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 3 | | 23% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 5 | | 38% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 5 | | 38% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.15 - The other course I had took too much time from this one.» (Around 25 hours/week)
2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 13 svarande
0%» | | 1 | | 7% |
25%» | | 1 | | 7% |
50%» | | 2 | | 15% |
75%» | | 8 | | 61% |
100%» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 3.53 - At the end, only exercise sessions. Lectures not comprehensible.» (50%)
- the exercise time overlap with wireless communication» (75%)
- It was double-scheduled with the other course.» (75%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?13 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 1 | | 7% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 5 | | 38% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 7 | | 53% |
Genomsnitt: 3.46 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.13 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 1 | | 7% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 12 | | 92% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.92 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?13 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 4 | | 30% |
Yes, definitely» | | 9 | | 69% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.69 - so many complex number calculation in the exam. that is difficult without a good calculator.» (To some extent)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?13 svarande
Small extent» | | 3 | | 23% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 30% |
Large extent» | | 6 | | 46% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.23 7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?13 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Large extent» | | 9 | | 69% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 3.15 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?13 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 2 | | 15% |
Rather well» | | 5 | | 38% |
Very well» | | 6 | | 46% |
Genomsnitt: 3.3
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?13 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 7% |
Very good» | | 11 | | 84% |
I did not seek help» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 4 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?13 svarande
Very poorly» | | 1 | | 7% |
Rather poorly» | | 1 | | 7% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 15% |
Very well» | | 9 | | 69% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.46 11. How was the course workload?13 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 7% |
Adequate» | | 8 | | 61% |
High» | | 4 | | 30% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.23 - But a little heavy in the end of the quarter cause of the report and presentation.» (Adequate)
12. How was the total workload this study period?13 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 30% |
High» | | 4 | | 30% |
Too high» | | 5 | | 38% |
Genomsnitt: 4.07 - many many assignments laboratories and projects! no time for studying! only group works! you find yourself studying almost only the weekend before the exams!» (High)
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?13 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 2 | | 15% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 7% |
Good» | | 7 | | 53% |
Excellent» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 3.84 - booooooring lectures, didn"t like the topics too much.» (Fair)
- The assigments are a good exercice and the lab is really interesting in order to apply theory» (Excellent)
14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Home Assingment 1 about the design of an amplifier.»
- general structure, topics, goals. Adequate.»
- teaching material for semiconductor.»
- I think the small theory introduction before each exercice session has to be preserved. »
- Homeassignement»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The report about the paper with regard to noise parameters in MESFETs. The paper is not understandable at all and you do not learn anything about noise.»
- The semiconductor part could be more clear. Better to tell student how much knowledge a student should equipped with after the course.»
- Slides of the course: really poor and badly structured. totally unuseful.»
- Jan»
- No exam but several assignments and with higher level of difficulty»
16. Additional comments
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|