ENKÄTER

 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.


MPWPS 1213-2 Microwave engineering, MCC121

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-02-03
Antal svar: 12
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 50%
Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs


Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»2 18%
Around 25 hours/week»8 72%
Around 30 hours/week»1 9%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»5 45%
100%»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 4.54


Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 18%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 81%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 90%
No, the goals are set too high»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- The goals are set high.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 54%
Yes, definitely»3 27%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

- Vissa uppgifter på tentan var för svåra med tanke på hur lite tid vi spenderat på vissa områden.» (To some extent)
- Hard examination.» (To some extent)


Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»2 18%
Some extent»4 36%
Large extent»5 45%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

- in spite of the fact that the teacher of the course is knowledgeable, he was the worst teacher i have ever had.he is too poor expressing concepts.» (Small extent)
- Räkneövningarna var bra.» (Some extent)
- I found the lectures giving, but the tutorials didn"t fit me at all.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 36%
Large extent»3 27%
Great extent»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The Pozar book is awesome.» (Large extent)
- The book is good and it is easy to find the relevant facts.» (Great extent)
- I really like the book.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»9 81%
Very well»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- I don"t like PingPong, but it was managed quite well.» (Rather well)


Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 45%
Very good»6 54%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- I am grateful for the help with borrowing a computer for the simulation software.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»5 45%
Very well»6 54%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 63%
High»2 18%
Too high»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- Although I did not participate fully in the scheduled lectures, it seemed a lot of the students (including me) were worried for this one. As Jan said, it is a challenging course.» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 36%
High»5 45%
Too high»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.81


Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 18%
Adequate»3 27%
Good»5 45%
Excellent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.45 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Even though I thought that I had some knowledge in the field, I felt that the course was valuable to me.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- All the labs and assignment.»
- teamwork»
- The computer simulation lab was really good. And so was the home assignment. Also got great help when asking questions to Hawal and Mustafa.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Bonuspoängen borde behållas i ett år. Varför ska man gå miste om sina förtjänta bonuspoäng om man skulle råka vara sjuk på ordinarie tentamen? Under grundutbildningen på Chalmers får man alltid behålla bonuspoängen i ett helt år. Varför håller inte Mastersnivån samma kvalité som grundutbildningen? Att det är krångligt för examinatorn att behålla bonuspoängen i ett år känns som ett dåligt argument för att dölja att denna är lat. Kursen borde ha rekommenderade uppgifter att räkna. Det känns som att examinatorn använder argumentet "att studenterna lär sig mer" om de finner egna uppgifter att räkna" som en dålig ursäkt för att dölja att denna är lat.»
- The handwriting of the lecturer and the TA.»
- The points for the hand-ins should be preserved to every re-exam that year. The exam questions was too poorly stated and a lot harder than previous years. Evaluation of the exam should be less strict. There should be recommended exercises.»
- There definitely should be recommended problems. This will help students to study for the exam and get a deeper understanding of the subject.»

16. Additional comments

- I really liked this course. It was good in so many aspects.»
- The tutorial guide was so helpful and he solved a lot of problems in class which was really very helpful»
- One week availabel period time before exam wiil be nice.»
- More exams with solutions would have been nice.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.45

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.45
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.61


Kursutvärderingssystem från