Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPEES 1213-2 Computer architecture, DAT105|DIT051

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-02-03
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40%
Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

12 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 8%
Around 20 hours/week»7 58%
Around 25 hours/week»3 25%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.41

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»1 7%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 15%
75%»4 30%
100%»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

- I did not attend the exercise sessions.» (50%)
- Good stuff by both Per and Angelos» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 7%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 23%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 69%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»12 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 53%
Yes, definitely»6 46%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.46

- The exam contained a lot of question that was not covered in detail during the lectures such as memory write through. Also too many WLIV related questions.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 8%
Large extent»9 75%
Great extent»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.08

- Great slides.» (Large extent)
- The Exercise sessions were great.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»2 15%
Some extent»1 7%
Large extent»8 61%
Great extent»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

- The English of the course book and the way that it uses to describe issues is really hard to understand. Can say one of the biggest problems of the course is the course book. you need to put loads of effort to understand what the book is going to say!!» (Small extent)
- I did not buy the book, too expensive. It would have been great if the questions from the exercise sessions would have been freely available.» (Small extent)
- The book is great, and even better that the lectures are so close to it» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 7%
Rather well»10 76%
Very well»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

- it seems the course was not organised! » (Rather badly)
- A bit too many notes on the message board about new content uploads.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 7%
Rather good»2 15%
Very good»9 69%
I did not seek help»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

12 svarande

Very poorly»1 8%
Rather poorly»1 8%
Rather well»2 16%
Very well»8 66%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- It was troublesome working with my lab partner, his contribution to the lab work was almost none at all.» (Rather poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»8 61%
High»4 30%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

- More hand-ins, perhaps?» (Low)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»6 46%
High»6 46%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 7%
Good»7 53%
Excellent»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 4.3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Very intereting subject thought in a good way.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The optional lectures were excellent.»
- The course content should be preserved also the Lab portion is also very much informative.»
- Angelos in very good, real study presentations»
- The real-stuff studies, the lab series using the SimpleScalar tool set, the optional lectures»
- The project and voluntary presentations»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Labs could start earlier so they could finish earlier and have time to study for the exam instead of finishing up lab reports. Labs were good but sometimes involved huge amounts of running the same calculations. Not sure how to improve that though.»
- I think lecture should provide some more information on basics of this course.»
- the course book»
- The project could be more fun, and less copy-paste»
- Publish the questions, which are required to follow the exercise sessions, on PingPong.»
- maybe some more lectures»

16. Additional comments

- the course needs to be better organised. for example students didn"t have access to the lab, keycards problem.»
- ..»
- The labs were great. But it was a bit tedious to copy values from the simulation results by hand. »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.3

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.3
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.82

Kursutvärderingssystem från