ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPEES 1213-2 Methods for electronic system design and verification, DAT110

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-02-03
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 47%
Kontaktperson: Linn Warg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 12%
Around 20 hours/week»2 25%
Around 25 hours/week»3 37%
Around 30 hours/week»2 25%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 14%
75%»1 14%
100%»5 71%

Genomsnitt: 4.57

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 12%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 75%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- especially parts of the labdescription» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- This course differed a lot from previous courses at Chalmers. It was, unfortunately, very much dependent on Per and since he took vacation for 3 weeks the course didn"t become as great as it could have been. Per is great and good in motivating students.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Teaching and course administration

5. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»1 12%
Some extent»4 50%
Large extent»2 25%
Great extent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

- The lectures were general and helpful in understanding other groups work on term papers.» (Some extent)
- It feels that I"ve learned a lot from term paper work and presentations as well.» (Large extent)

6. How was the support you got for the term paper work?

- Feedback was given for the term paper report, which was helpful.»
- Got feedback of Term paper report. Which was much helpful»
- Allmost none, except the feedback on the early draft.»
- Didn"t ask/get support»
- Not much, but the feedback from Per was good.»
- Good to get feedback in advance»

7. Were the instructions for the term paper work sufficiently clear?

- No. A example report should have been provided for reference.»
- Up to some Extent»
- Yes»
- Yes»
- Yes»
- I think we could do as we wanted. It might have been nice to discuss with the examiner in the startup if we had chosen the right topics to focus on, our if we should have considered other aspects.»
- Pretty much»

8. Was the time for preparation of the presentation sufficient?

- ya.»
- If some more time was allocated then could have done much better.»
- Yes»
- Yes, although we misjudged the needed time and planning together with other courses went quite poor»
- Yes»
- It came a bit early, so one didn"t have that much knowledge about the topic. But on the other hand it was good to have it done and get questions from other groups.»
- Pretty much»

9. Was the time for preparation of the term paper report sufficient?

- ya.»
- Ya, if preparation time for the Presentation was little bit more than Term paper time after that would be enough.»
- Yes»
- Yes»
- Yes»
- Yes, but it took a lot of time to do the term paper. »
- Pretty much»

10. How usefuel were the lectures (lecture slides) for the term paper work?

- No lectures!»
- Should give some more time on Term paper Introduction using practical examples rather than on lectures»
- They gave an introduction to the topic (which is good), so more effort could be spent on in-depth studies. »
- Ok»
- A bit, but not very much. Good to know a little about what was going to be presented later by other groups though.»
- Not very useful at all. The lectures provided little additional information needed for the course.»

11. Were the instructions for the labs sufficiently clear?

- ya.»
- Labs were informative and clear»
- Yes, allthough instructions on the labreport could have been clearer. »
- No. Part of the lab didn"t work and some parts where poorly described. I"ve updated the teachers about that.»
- Yes, but software wasn"t working as expected from time to time.»
- Pretty much»

12. How was the support during lab time?

- good!»
- Support was Awesome, due to support lab was not that hard to carry out.»
- The only time it was hard to get help, when the software didn"t work. Otherwise the groups were small enough so everyone could get help in time.»
- Very good, Alen is great»
- Good. In some cases crowded»
- Very good, Alen was also quite fast on responding to email.»
- Good, Alen is a good lab assistant.»

13. How helpful was the log book and the feedback you got there?

- I"m not sure how log book can help in this course, as we only have 4 lab sessions.»
- Got perfect feedback on Log books.»
- It was helpful in a sence that I knew what to put in my labreport.»
- Ok. We could have got more information on how the logbook should have been written. There was a misunderstanding about that.»
- It is good to reflect on what has been done. I think I spent way to much time on trying to write, because it was quite unclear how it was supposed to be done. The feedback from Per was helpful but the feedback of the first entries wasn"t done by Per and it didn"t help at all, I just got more confused and it was more or less about nonsense and grammar.»
- Not very useful at all.»

14. How helpful were the tutorial sessions with Alen?

- good!»
- Not attended.»
- Some sessions were after the first group had related lab.»
- Ok»
- Good to know common mistakes, the sessions were kept quite short so I think they were fine.»
- Somewhat helpful»

15. Do you think the grading with 60% labwork and 40% term paper is suitable?

- Should be fine!»
- I think its fine. but should give option of feedback on Lab report also.»
- Nah, 50/50 suits better in my opinion.»
- Yes»
- Yes»
- I spent more time on term paper work than lab, but I guess it is suitable. It was many different tasks that were graded and hard to know what was needed in the end to achieve a good grade. »
- Pretty much»

16. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»2 25%
Some extent»4 50%
Large extent»1 12%
Great extent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.12

- did not buy» (Small extent)
- In lab: No. Term paper: Yes.» (Some extent)

17. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»7 87%
Very well»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

Study climate

18. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 50%
Very good»4 50%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

19. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 25%
Very well»6 75%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

20. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 12%
Adequate»2 25%
High»5 62%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- only stuff to do at the end.» (Low)
- When the software malfunctioned and labs started to pile up to the end of the course made the workload high.» (High)

21. How was the total workload this study period?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 25%
High»4 50%
Too high»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 4

- The collision with mixed-signal deadlines made the last study week very stressful. » (Too high)
- I am not used to writing and do not have any good routines for that. If something is going to be graded one doesn"t want to do a poor job but then there is no time and everything f*cks up.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

22. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 12%
Good»6 75%
Excellent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Too undefined subject.» (Adequate)
- It was an interesting course with a broad scope of topics.» (Good)
- It has potential, but it is very much dependent on Per Larsson-Edefors.» (Good)
- Good learning.» (Excellent)

23. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Both labs and term paper»
- Alen»
- Lab and term paper with presentation»
- The term paper was fun and nothing I have done before.»
- The whole development process is a suitable target to execute during the lab.»

24. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The scheduling was a bit messy when Kjell had to jump in.»
- Update the labPM»
- The teacher that held the course SW4-6. Clearer grading of tasks so it is easier to know what grade is realistic.»
- Maybe solidify the subject somehow.»

25. Additional comments

- Instructions for opponent and lab reports should be clearer. Introduce deadlines for all logbook entries. Put all instructions and deadlines in a separate pingpong page. It"s kind of annoying to go through different lecture slides every time.»
- God teacher!»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75

Kursutvärderingssystem från