Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPIDE 1213-2 Mobile computing - Design and implementation, CIU196

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-02-03
Antal svar: 18
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36%
Kontaktperson: Börje Johansson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Informationsteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

18 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»4 22%
Around 25 hours/week»9 50%
Around 30 hours/week»5 27%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

- The workload was increased for every week.» (Around 20 hours/week)
- More effort in the last week ( 35 hour ) » (Around 25 hours/week)
- Spent much more hours towards the end of the period than in the beginning.» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

18 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»3 16%
75%»9 50%
100%»6 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

- I was interested in Android» (50%)
- only the part for android, not iphone» (50%)
- Skipped the Iphone development.» (75%)
- 100% relevant to the OS i developed for.» (75%)
- Good that it was split between IOS and android» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

18 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 6%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»15 93%
I have not seen/read the goals»2

Genomsnitt: 2.93

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»16 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

18 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 43%
Yes, definitely»9 56%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2

Genomsnitt: 2.56

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»12 66%
Large extent»6 33%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»7 38%
Large extent»7 38%
Great extent»3 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- The programming parts of the project was largely up to the student.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

18 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»11 61%
Very well»6 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- All time high.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

18 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»14 77%
Very good»4 22%
I did not seek help»0

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- Maybe some more lab time would"ve been good» (Rather good)
- Would have been good with more lab hours.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

18 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»5 27%
Very well»13 72%
I did not seek cooperation»0

Genomsnitt: 3.72

11. How was the course workload?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 16%
High»13 72%
Too high»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.94

- The course obviously required a lot of work, since it involves a lot of programming. However, in the last week the workload was extremely high because of the tight deadlines, which in reality, left 2 days for the home exam, even though it was handed out in 5 days before deadline.» (High)
- Especially towards the end.» (High)
- Mainly the examination part, having presentation, report AND home exam. Also the calculated work was 25 hours each week, but the time it take to do the labs was really underestimated.» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»3 16%
High»10 55%
Too high»4 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.94

- I did 3 courses, therefore too high» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

18 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 5%
Good»15 83%
Excellent»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 4.05 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- More time for the project would have been nice. The home exam felt a bit crammed in and the literature wasn"t that fresh in yer mind. Why not have the home exam in the middle of the period, before the project starts, and then focus solely on the project?» (Good)
- I wanted to learn how to program for android and this course helps a lot.» (Good)
- It is a good course. But please try to have consistency with the lectures times. Chalmers standard is 45 min and then 15 min break. it is 10.15 to 12 or 10 to 11.45. NOT 10-12 (e.g.) » (Good)
- One of the better courses at the IxD Program!» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The project part, maybe it should be given more time though.»
- not focus in just one plataform»
- Olof. »
- project and exercises»
- The Android / iOS freedom.»
- The opportunity to choose the system to do the project for. The weekly overview on what to do was great.»
- Everything»
- project»
- The project work should be there, perhaps given even more time. The lab work is also helpful.»
- The project»
- the programming part of the course »
- The project where you create an smartphone application.»
- weekly schedules, very helpful!»
- To be able to decide on what platform to develop for»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The means of examination. We get the home exam the 19th, a day that is packed with work from the project course presentations and report. The 20th is packed with mobile presentations and report. Having to sit Saturday 22th December is not appreciated...»
- how is the project graded»
- Put the home exam in the middle of the course instead, when the students have read the papers. It makes no sense to read the papers in the beginning of the course then have 3 weeks only working on a project and then expect the students to remember what they read 3 weeks before. Roughly in the middle of the course there was one week where students were making prototypes. During this week the workload was lower so perhaps one could instead also include the home exam during this and/or the following week. The project deadline can then be moved to where the home exam deadline was. This will also make the workload more even throughout the course. This year the deadline for the project was 2 days before the deadline of the home exam, and since this is a course involving programming in new languages and frameworks, one could expect the students to work a lot with the programming, leaving the writing for later when the presentations/demos are done. »
- workload distribution»
- The exam week workload. Would be great if the home-exam could be done earlier in the course, before the project. To have it during the same time as the project presentations as well as report hand-in made it too much.»
- Have the homeexam before the project starts.»
- I would prefer higher level coding lectures. Not in terms of quality, but dealing with deeper coding choices, following patterns and guidelines etc. A couple of pointers to coding solutions and examples of code that works are welcome. Better quality of lab briefs.»
- the frontal lectures about programming. It would be better do them directly as laboratories, in a way that students can try directly the code explained by the teacher and the teacher can help them if they have troubles.»
- The workload was too high in the end. My suggestion is to have the home exam halfways through the course. Also, this course expect from start that you already have skills in OOP, but that is not one of the prerequisites to enter the Interaction Design programme.»
- have the home exam earlier when we read the course material, instead of having it last, when we want to finish the app, at least do not overlap the deadline of app and start of home exam. »

16. Additional comments

- Fun course!»
- Good course, felt like it was well organized compared to some other courses in the masters.»
- It was a good choice to add some literature to increase the academic gravity of the course. The problem was that it felt a bit disconnected from what we were doing at the time the papers were given. We basically needed the literature for the exam mostly, and I don"t know how useful it is to read it a month or more before that. They must be put in context, perhaps combine a paper with an exercise of those we did every Wednesday.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.05

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.05
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.76

Kursutvärderingssystem från