ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

SP2_12/13_Managing stakeholders for sustainable development, ENM130

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-21 - 2013-01-24
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 69%
Kontaktperson: Christina Larsson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 11%
Around 20 hours/week»3 33%
Around 25 hours/week»2 22%
Around 30 hours/week»2 22%
At least 35 hours/week»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- It is not always the same time each week. It depends of the weekly task.» (Around 20 hours/week)
- To much to read, and sometimes the text where not relevant» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 11%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 22%
100%»6 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.44

- And I regret that I missed a all week, because it seemed very interesting !» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 11%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 11%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 77%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- I feel that the course do not reflect them fully. I expected more practical tools or management guidelines.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 22%
Yes, definitely»5 55%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 11%
Large extent»4 44%
Great extent»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Very informative, understanding, demanding, integrating and responsive to student needs, wants and suggestions!» (Great extent)

7. What are you general reflection on the lectures by

Matrisfråga

- I often felt that some kind of background informations was missing, we often just jumped in into the different themes. »
- of course, the teacher interest me to a varying degree, depending on topic of discussion. Would be strange if i gave all top notch scores. »

Steven Sarasini
9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Quite poor»0 0%
Quite good»1 11%
Good»2 22%
Very good»6 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.55

Bo Kjellén
9 svarande

Poor»1 11%
Quite poor»1 11%
Quite good»0 0%
Good»4 44%
Very good»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

Claes Ohlsson
9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Quite poor»1 11%
Quite good»0 0%
Good»4 44%
Very good»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 4.22

Michelle von Gyllenpalm
8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Quite poor»0 0%
Quite good»0 0%
Good»1 12%
Very good»7 87%

Genomsnitt: 4.87

Isodora Wronski
8 svarande

Poor»1 12%
Quite poor»4 50%
Quite good»2 25%
Good»1 12%
Very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

Tomas Ekberg
8 svarande

Poor»2 25%
Quite poor»2 25%
Quite good»1 12%
Good»3 37%
Very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

Matthias Lehner
7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Quite poor»0 0%
Quite good»0 0%
Good»3 42%
Very good»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 4.57

Hanna Lind
8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Quite poor»0 0%
Quite good»1 12%
Good»3 37%
Very good»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.37

8. How useful did you find the discussion seminars?

9 svarande

Very useful»3 33%
Useful»5 55%
Not at all useful»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 1.77

- Could have related more directly and explicitly to course literature. » (Very useful)
- change them to literature seminar instead, the papers where sometimes difficult to understand» (Not at all useful)

9. How useful did you find the weekly tasks?

8 svarande

Very useful»4 50%
Useful»4 50%
Not at all useful»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

- Unfortunately did not take.» (?)
- Sometimes the description of the weekly task is a little bit blurry.» (Very useful)
- Practice for the exam. Unfortunately i understood that a little too late...» (Very useful)
- Maybe the weekly tasks could be more connected to the exam in the end, so that if you performed them well, you will have an advance...» (Useful)
- good, but hard to understand sometimes.» (Useful)

10. How useful did you find the workshops?

9 svarande

Very useful»6 66%
Useful»3 33%
Not at all useful»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

- very useful, a lot of discussions, fun and stimulating. » (Very useful)

11. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 22%
Large extent»5 55%
Great extent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Some articles were difficult to connect to the lecture topics. » (Large extent)

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»2 22%
Very well»7 77%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

- No problems with that.» (Very well)

Study climate

13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»1 11%
Rather poor»1 11%
Rather good»1 11%
Very good»6 66%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- High availability of the teachers. High ceiling in the discussions. Relaxed and personal atmosphere.» (Very poor)

14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»1 11%
Rather poorly»1 11%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»7 77%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

- It will be better if we should work with different groups for different weekly tasks.» (Very well)

15. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 66%
High»2 22%
Too high»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

- change the scheduale if possible» (High)

16. How was the total workload this study period?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 37%
High»4 50%
Too high»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- I was ill for a significant part of it.» (?)

17. What did you think of the way the course was scheduled (Tuesdays, Thursdays, Fridays, afternoons)?

9 svarande

Very good»0 0%
Good»2 22%
OK»4 44%
Bad»2 22%
Very bad»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- It will be better if we could have the lecture before the discussion seminar, so we know better how to work on the task for the workshop.» (Good)
- To have the lectures on tuedays and then the handin on wednedays is not optimal, since the lecture will help you with the task but at the same time, you want time to reflect what you did. I did mine mainly on mondays, and it required more work than if I did them on wednesdays, but then I didnt have the time to reflect on my work» (OK)
- Does not matter that much to me. » (OK)
- It would have been better to have the seminars on Friday, so that we can use what we learned from the lectures on tuesday» (Bad)
- It sucked.» (Very bad)

Summarizing questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»5 55%
Excellent»4 44%

Genomsnitt: 4.44 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Very useful, but I wished it could focus more on management aids. MSP for example was just mentioned in the passing. I had expected more.» (Good)
- I enjoyed the course and learned a lot.» (Excellent)
- Very interesting topics, good connection to the "real world", very inspiring with invited guest lecturers» (Excellent)

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The weekly task, the guest lectures»
- the workshops, and Sarasini!»
- Workshops, but with more directions on how to perform them.»
- The Kyoto role play seminar was excelent. It is definitely good to have guest lecturers. »
- The awesome guest lectures and the weekly tasks.»
- Guest lecturers, discussions»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The review of literature each week»
- Rethink about if bo kjellen should be a guest lecture. The lecture least intresting, old school teaching»
- The order in which the lectures were given, schedule. The theme with the technology should be changed or deleted, that part was hard to relate to and I did not know how useful that information will be for me after graduating.»
- The format of the workshops, and the connection to course literature.»

21. 2. Do you have any general comments on how the lectures can be improved?

- I think that the teachers can have higher expectations on the performance on the weekly tasks, and that you are supposed to fix your shortcomings before they are passed. I think this would be really helofull for the learning and imporvement. Also, the lecture on how to write essays was really good. It should be in the beginning of the course so the students can practice their writings skills before the home exam.»
- Focus more on the existing tools, how we can managed stakeholders in real life. Some connections to SEA, EIA would have been nice.»
- Learn more on tools that we can use.»
- Weekly tasks should play a role in the final grade. »
- Good job.»

22. Additional comments

- try to get more students!»
- I really liked this course, it´,s a keeper.»
- The guest lectures are very good! It"s important for us to have some interaction with people having practical experience in certain issues.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.44
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.44
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.86

Kursutvärderingssystem från