ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Nanomaterials chemistry, KTK041, sp 2 2012

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-10 - 2013-01-27
Antal svar: 20
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 48%
Kontaktperson: Inga-Lena Hagelin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Kemiteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

20 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»6 30%
Around 20 hours/week»8 40%
Around 25 hours/week»3 15%
Around 30 hours/week»3 15%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.15

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

20 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 10%
50%»1 5%
75%»6 30%
100%»11 55%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

20 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»5 25%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 30%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 45%

Genomsnitt: 2.95

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

17 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»17 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

19 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 15%
Yes, definitely»9 47%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»7 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»3 15%
Some extent»5 25%
Large extent»10 50%
Great extent»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»11 55%
Large extent»5 25%
Great extent»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

20 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»4 20%
Rather well»12 60%
Very well»4 20%

Genomsnitt: 3

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

20 svarande

Very poor»1 5%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»7 35%
Very good»6 30%
I did not seek help»6 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

19 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 5%
Rather well»8 42%
Very well»9 47%
I did not seek cooperation»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.52

11. How was the course workload?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 10%
Adequate»13 65%
High»5 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

12. How was the total workload this study period?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»10 50%
High»8 40%
Too high»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

20 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»4 20%
Good»12 60%
Excellent»4 20%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Martins question time!»
- The lectures are good. Especially Martins part with the halftime questions. »
- Structure of the examination.»
- Journal Club, good lectures.»
- Projects were good.»
- Course structure, journal club presentations»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Anders should do line Martin: question time!»
- I would like more frequent uploads of all the slides and other information well before the lectures. Sometimes the slides weren"t up until the same morning as the lecture which made it difficult to print them out before the morning lectures started. »
- Lecture time. Not all lectures at 8 o"clock. It is too early to follow the content. There are other options in Block D, at least for one lecture per week.»
- Lab projects could be less cramped with smaller groups»

16. Additional comments

- The Project (Grätzel cell) I found did not have hardly anything to do with this course in nanomaterials chemistry. The other groups had good use of their projects on the exam as silica and gold were two of the exam questions. However our project I found was not covered at all by any chapter in this course. It was a fun project but I did find we had a disadvantage compared to the other three groups. »
- Problems with the handouts in the beginning of the course, otherwise things were fine.»
- Use the student portal instead of PingPong to upload course information!»
- Great course, gives a general idea of current research in nanochemistry. Thoroughly enjoyed it»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75

Kursutvärderingssystem från