Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPBME 1213-2 Biomedical instrumentation, SSY090

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-21 - 2013-01-27
Antal svar: 18
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 56%
Kontaktperson: Monika Råberg Hellsing»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Read this before filling in the questionnaire

Keep in mind that everyone involved in the course will be able to read your comments. Comments and criticism are welcome, but should remain constructive.

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

18 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»6 33%
Around 20 hours/week»4 22%
Around 25 hours/week»5 27%
Around 30 hours/week»3 16%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

18 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 5%
75%»1 5%
100%»16 88%

Genomsnitt: 4.83

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

18 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 27%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»13 72%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

18 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 5%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»17 94%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.94

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

By examination we mean laborations, assignments etc., as well as written exams or larger projects.

18 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 22%
Yes, definitely»13 72%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»10 55%
Large extent»2 11%
Great extent»6 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»2 11%
Large extent»8 44%
Great extent»7 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

18 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»4 22%
Very well»13 72%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

9. Comments about teaching and course administration

- It"s easier to find documents if they are organized into folders. Sabine"s lectures were not the most inspiring, felt more like she read from the book, which I could have done myself. Varying guest lectures, the prothesis lecture was very inspiring!»
- Teaching was alright.»
- The teaching team of Sabine and Hamid was excellent. Both were very good instructors. The guest lectures were hit-and-miss though.»
- The X-ray lectures guy was not very good as well as the lungs guys»
- It was hard to find specific information since there were information posted in many areas at pingpong, would be preferred to organize in folders and name the documents after what information that is inside. One example that was hard to find was the group numbers»
- It was a good introduction to biomedical engineering and there was good exposure to the practices in the industry by current engineers who have a good knowledge about their field. The hands on experience given in the course was valuable.»
- It almost felt like no content from the lectures was of use for the assignments. You just sat and googled it all up anyways.»

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

18 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 27%
Very good»13 72%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

18 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 5%
Very well»16 88%
I did not seek cooperation»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 4

12. How was the course workload?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»13 72%
High»4 22%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

13. How was the total workload this study period?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»8 44%
High»5 27%
Too high»5 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

18 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»5 27%
Good»5 27%
Excellent»8 44%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- ECG lab, guest lectures, study visit and voluntary home exam»
- The handins and home exam»
- The projects were fun,interesting and reasonable.»
- The project»
- The Biomaterials MRI and prosthetics lectures»
- The hand-in assignments and the ECG lab.»
- Keep the basic stuff as introduction»
- The lab, project and the visit to the hospital!»
- Hamid!»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Less guest lecturers...more visits to hospitals or other medical sites for instance companies.. The way the handins are expressed...more information should be given before hand.The questions must be less general.»
- The lab could be improved (more TAs or better equipment?)»
- The X-ray lecturer»
- Maybe some additional information on soldering, it seemed like some people did not understood how to create a good solder.»
- Folders at pingpong and easier to find information. Give an other view than that from the book in the beginning lectures»
- More help in labview»
- The fourth assignment where you do some signal processing in labview is very unuseful in my oppinion and just creates extra work when having things to do in other courses that have heavy workload during this period.»

17. Additional comments

- Inconsistent grading of hone exercises. Some got returns on questions, to which others had not answered at all but they did not get a return. Sometimes the return was actually (implicitly) answered in the text, which made it feel like the one correcting did not fully read the reports. Rather take longer time and make sure the grading is fair. Also felt a bit easy to pass certain tasks (e.g. the project reports).»
- Very good course and teaching techniques»
- I would like the guest lecturer to delve into more details and not just a quick overview of their subjects»
- The Elvis-platform maybe wasn"t the best equipment during the ECG labs. It was easier to use the function generators and analogue oscilloscopes for troubleshooting. Maybe due to that noone really got the grip on the Elvis platforms.»
- One of the best courses at Chalmers so far»

Kursutvärderingssystem från