Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPBME 1213-2 Medicine for the engineer, SSY180

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-21 - 2013-01-27
Antal svar: 26
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 38%
Kontaktperson: Monika Råberg Hellsing»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

26 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»23 88%
Around 20 hours/week»2 7%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»1 3%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.19

- Very low amounts of effort » (At most 15 hours/week)
- did not attend part b of the course since lack of time» (At most 15 hours/week)
- I had good knowledge in most of the covered areas before.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

26 svarande

0%»2 7%
25%»3 11%
50%»9 34%
75%»8 30%
100%»4 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.34

- Did not have the time to go there. Otherwise I would have been there.» (0%)
- I had good knowledge in most of the covered areas before.» (25%)
- I had a course conflict on Monday evenings so I attended only Thursdays» (50%)
- Only attended half because I was home sick for 5 weeks.» (50%)
- Evenint lectures are more difficult to fit into the schedule.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

26 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»9 34%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 3%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 26%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 34%

Genomsnitt: 2.61

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

20 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 10%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»18 90%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

22 svarande

No, not at all»1 4%
To some extent»12 54%
Yes, definitely»8 36%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- There were many chapters in the book that was not representet at all in the exam.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

25 svarande

Small extent»3 12%
Some extent»12 48%
Large extent»6 24%
Great extent»4 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

- (As before, did not have time to attend to any of the teaching)» (Small extent)

7. Questions about the lectures. What did you think about ...


- Peeker was definitely the best lecturer. Even more than "very good".»
- All lecturers were good, but Peeker was extraordinary entertaining to listen to, he really caught the audience!»

... the biocemistry, cell and tissue by Larsson?
25 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»5 20%
Good»5 20%
Very good»9 36%
I didn"t attend»6 24%

Genomsnitt: 4.64

... the digestive system lecture by Khorram-Manesh?
26 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»3 11%
Good»7 26%
Very good»13 50%
I didn"t attend»3 11%

Genomsnitt: 4.61

... The circulatory system by Hornestam?
26 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»4 15%
OK»6 23%
Good»9 34%
Very good»3 11%
I didn"t attend»4 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

... the endocrine, blood, reproductive etc system by Nilsson?
25 svarande

Very bad»1 4%
Bad»3 12%
OK»3 12%
Good»8 32%
Very good»7 28%
I didn"t attend»3 12%

Genomsnitt: 4.04

... the CNS/PNS by Skoglund?
26 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»5 19%
Good»8 30%
Very good»4 15%
I didn"t attend»9 34%

Genomsnitt: 4.65

... the sensory organs by Hallén?
26 svarande

Very bad»1 3%
Bad»0 0%
OK»6 23%
Good»7 26%
Very good»3 11%
I didn"t attend»9 34%

Genomsnitt: 4.46

... the respiratory and musculoskletal system by Örtenwall?
26 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»1 3%
Good»11 42%
Very good»5 19%
I didn"t attend»9 34%

Genomsnitt: 4.84

... the urinary tract by Peeker?
26 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»2 7%
Good»6 23%
Very good»10 38%
I didn"t attend»8 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.92

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

26 svarande

Small extent»3 11%
Some extent»5 19%
Large extent»9 34%
Great extent»9 34%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- didn"t open the book» (Small extent)
- Good for reading if you were unable to attend a lecture.» (Some extent)
- I learnt most from lectures and reading the notes I took, but the book had some extra information sometimes, as well as explanations from another point of view sometimes.» (Some extent)
- The course book was really good and easy to follow.» (Great extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

26 svarande

Very badly»1 3%
Rather badly»3 11%
Rather well»14 53%
Very well»8 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- Slides weren"t uploaded prior to some of the lectures.» (Rather badly)
- Wish they good switch to PingPong as Studentportalen barely works.» (Rather well)
- Could be better, some slides were wrong and some did not come up, but otherwise it worked well» (Rather well)

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

26 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»4 15%
Rather good»6 23%
Very good»8 30%
I did not seek help»8 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

- Only available at the lectures, and usually you have questions some time after. Not a big deal though.» (Rather poor)

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

26 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 3%
Rather well»4 15%
Very well»5 19%
I did not seek cooperation»16 61%

Genomsnitt: 4.38

12. How was the course workload?

25 svarande

Too low»2 8%
Low»8 32%
Adequate»14 56%
High»1 4%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.56

- To learn everything was very heavy, sometimes hard to know what one should focus on.» (Adequate)

13. How was the total workload this study period?

26 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 7%
Adequate»8 30%
High»10 38%
Too high»6 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

- Also did my master thesis.» (High)

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

26 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»3 11%
Adequate»4 15%
Good»13 50%
Excellent»6 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- I find it hard to find motivation for the less relevant topics, such as pregnancy and birth, reproductive, hormones, etc.» (Adequate)
- Best course I"ve taken so far at Chalmers!» (Excellent)
- Very interesting» (Excellent)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- All guest lectures were very interesting»
- Publication of a model exam in the homepage, but also for part B.»
- the exam with 1 x 2 questions. To learn every word by heart is to hard. The 1 x 2 questions was not easy, so this is a good way.»
- The lecturers were good but their material was poor. The notes need to be rewritten»
- Interesting lectures.»
- The lecturers were really good and should be preserved.»
- Love the fact that doctors/surgeons are teaching this course. One of the best course I"ve taken»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Notifications about cancelled lectures should be sent by email, it is not easy to be checking the course homepage continuously.»
- Give more reading instructions. What pages/chapters are more important than others. This can be bad if the student only focus on those pages...»
- add a study visit or opportunity to see surgeries, etc.»
- Don"t know really..»
- The circulatory system by Hornestam.»
- Evening lectures is not optimal»
- Maybe changing it to a webcourse instead of having lectures during late evenings»

17. Additional comments

- Great course!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från