ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPEPO 1213-2 Power electronic solutions for power systems, ENM100

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-20 - 2013-01-27
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 43%
Kontaktperson: Monika Råberg Hellsing»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Read this before filling in the questionnaire

Keep in mind that everyone involved in the course will be able to read your comments. Comments and criticism are welcome, but should remain constructive.

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 6%
Around 20 hours/week»5 31%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»6 37%
At least 35 hours/week»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 6%
75%»1 6%
100%»14 87%

Genomsnitt: 4.81

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

15 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 13%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 13%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»11 73%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 7%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»12 92%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.92

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

By examination we mean laborations, assignments etc., as well as written exams or larger projects.

14 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 21%
Yes, definitely»10 71%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»4 25%
Great extent»12 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 18%
Large extent»7 43%
Great extent»6 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 25%
Very well»12 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

9. Comments about teaching and course administration

- got a lot of help when needed.:)»
- The course teacher and the tutor are very good and determined to their work. They do exactly what they are supposed to do. Congratulations to them.»
- Massimo was very well prepared and his lectures were simply awesome. I really enjoyed him delivering course material to students!»
- Great teacher but the Tutor is not helpful »
- Very good way to teach in classes»
- Best lectures I have attended in Chalmers»
- Probably the best lectures during my 4.5 years on Chalmers.»

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

16 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 12%
Very good»14 87%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

16 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 6%
Rather well»2 12%
Very well»12 75%
I did not seek cooperation»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

12. How was the course workload?

16 svarande

Too low»1 6%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»11 68%
High»4 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

13. How was the total workload this study period?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 43%
High»9 56%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.56

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»5 31%
Excellent»11 68%

Genomsnitt: 4.68

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- I think it should continue to be mandatory. the practical projoects!»
- The current situation should be preserved to next year.»
- Good lectures and tutorials, useful and interesting content, good slides and custom power compendium. »
- Massimo!!!»
- More tutorials »
- The laboratories»
- Massimo! Great lectures and he shows a lot of interest in his students. Great Job!»
- Massimo is a great teacher!»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Nothing»
- Maybe add some more topic. Like for instance more about HVDC.»
- Almost everything was fine. Just not totally satisfied with the way of correcting/grading the midterm exam. »
- The tutor was not very helpful. »
- More information about possible exercises»
- The majority of the teaching occasions collided with my other course, IBB135 Project Management. It is understandable that there might be some collisions and that it is hard to consider all other courses at Chalmers when scheduling, but as both of them are suggested at the information about elegible courses, it would have been if I had not had to miss more than half of this course"s lecture due to compulsory activities in the Project Management!»
- Little more theory and little more visulizations »
- There should be two lab assistances.»

17. Additional comments

- maybe some clearer guidelines on what is expected from the students would ease some of the felt anxiety!»
- Very good course»
- One of the best teachers I ever had. Thump up to Massimo and his great way of teaching. Very clear to what the students suppose to do. Helpful outside the lecture room as well. BR»
- Best course I"ve ever taken at Chalmers. Massimo is a great teacher!»
- I think it is very easy to get the impression that very few of the FACTS-devices treated in the course is actually used in reallity. Therefore I really hope that the course content is the most suitable and usefull for the students!! I think that the derivation in Lecture 8 page 4 (7-8) could be explained a bit more than what was the case during the lecture. I also think the explanation of the curve shapes of current and voltage for the TCSC could be explained a bit more since the book has some confusing notation. »
- Massimo was of the opinion that as long as you understand the theory, the calculation will be of no problem. I can agree to some extent, but not all the way. It is one thing to understand the theory, but you also need to practice doing the calculations and problem solving methodology, and it is also a great help having solved a few problems to have something to relate your theoretical understanding on. It is not really necessary having more tutorials led by teachers, but I would appreciate having a few more examples/problems with solutions available to practice on.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från