Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPEPO 1213-2 High voltage engineering, MTT035

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-12-21 - 2013-01-27
Antal svar: 39
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 55%
Kontaktperson: Monika Råberg Hellsing»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Read this before filling in the questionnaire

Keep in mind that everyone involved in the course will be able to read your comments. Comments and criticism are welcome, but should remain constructive.

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

38 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 5%
Around 20 hours/week»13 34%
Around 25 hours/week»18 47%
Around 30 hours/week»5 13%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.68

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

38 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»12 31%
100%»26 68%

Genomsnitt: 4.68

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

37 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 2%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 16%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»30 81%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

36 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»35 97%
No, the goals are set too high»1 2%

Genomsnitt: 2.02

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

By examination we mean laborations, assignments etc., as well as written exams or larger projects.

36 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»11 30%
Yes, definitely»25 69%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.69

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

38 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 2%
Large extent»16 42%
Great extent»21 55%

Genomsnitt: 3.52

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

38 svarande

Small extent»1 2%
Some extent»22 57%
Large extent»10 26%
Great extent»5 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

38 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»19 50%
Very well»19 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

9. Comments about teaching and course administration

- Book (Kuffel, Zaengl) was barely used because lecture and tutorial material is so much easier to understand. »
- Really good to have the slides related to the lecture uploaded to the course homepage.»
- Very good commitment from the teacher. Helped making me interested in the subject.»
- The teaching was great, it was a joy to attend the lectures and the tutaorials. »
- The lectures and tutorials were well delivered in an understandable way»
- Good lectures.»

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

38 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»7 18%
Very good»30 78%
I did not seek help»1 2%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

38 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»12 31%
Very well»26 68%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

12. How was the course workload?

37 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»27 72%
High»9 24%
Too high»1 2%

Genomsnitt: 3.29

13. How was the total workload this study period?

38 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»13 34%
High»14 36%
Too high»11 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.94

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

38 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 7%
Good»16 42%
Excellent»19 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.42

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Lecture and tutorials work very well as they are now.»
- Jörgen is one of the best teachers so far»
- Jörgen should keep teaching the way he does, he is doing an excellent work. »
- The whole course as it is.»
- Blackboard notes! The excellent excercises!»
- The teachers was outstanding!»
- The lectures were fantastic. Clear and understandable. »
- Blackboard lectures are great, tutorials are great. »
- Basicaly evertything»
- The lectures were very good and the exam was directly linked with the lectures, so no changes there.»
- Teaching methodology»
- The summary of the lecture notes should continue. It helps when doing personal reading»
- Lab»
- The enthusiasm from the lecturer and from the tutor.»
- Lectures»
- The lectures were very good »
- Blennow and Thomas. The laborations.»
- Jörgen Blennow is a really good teacher»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Jörgen should say out loud what he"s writing on the board. Then it"s much easier to take notes.»
- »
- both courses. ENM060 and MTT035 in the same term are really hard...maybe the schedule should get changed or the level of the courses set down»
- More varied exam»
- The laborations could be changed in a way that so that more focus was put on the laborations itself. As it was now we could spend too much time discussing something we just calculated wrong instead of discussing how it actually works or why we did it. For the next year try to change the prework for the laborations so it will give more understanding, because as it was now it was hard to connect the labs to the prework and it all ended up as pretty boring. »
- Vital points in the excercise can be highlighted in a different color instead of underlined and circled with the same white. It makes the board look messy by the end.»
- Would be nice to see some design project on cost of some tutorial problems like mentioned in last lecture»
- Maybe the labs can be divided into three sessions.»
- Lab 2 felt like it would never end, it took 2 hours to go through the home-assignments which was too long. We had to explain two questions each but if we had made a mistake we just had to stand there for 10 min and try to figure it out, but if the entire group spent hours and hours and didn"t figure it out i strongly doubt that one stressed person will have a miraculous prophesy and just know it ... »
- 1. An industrial visit can be planned for this course as well. 2. MATLAB based learning should be introduced instead of just calculative stuff. »
- The first lab was too long which also made understanding its essence very difficult»
- define the necessity of theoretical understanding parallell to the calculation exercises.»
- The labs were long.. hard to keep attention up all the time »
- The second lab. The instructors where the worst on the master programme this far. Bad instructions and bad flow. They only wanted to test the preperation instead of teaching the thing we hade missed.»

17. Additional comments

- Thanks for a course that set me back on track for this masterprogram!»
- Great course»
- The exam was weird. the calculating part was extremely hard to understand and the points given for the hardest Gauss law question I have ever seen was a complete joke.»
- Kudos to Jörgen for writing all lectures instead of taking the easy way out (and less educative) and only showing slides. Made the learning process much easier.»
- »
- Good course for HV Engineers... The guest lecture was good...The referenced literature was rather difficult to understand..»
- the marking was a bit hard i think»
- The examination surprised me about the small part of calculations, and that the thoretical part was bigger than supposed. All the tutorials where focused on calculations and didn"t prepare me for the theoretical parts.»
- Exellent course! More focus about general knowledge in the field of High Voltage, not mainly focus on calculations (too much in some other courses).»
- Good course material»

Kursutvärderingssystem från