Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

12lp1 Strategic Management and Economics of Intellectual Property, TEK315, TEK315

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-11-19 - 2012-12-03
Antal svar: 19
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 47%
Kontaktperson: Marcus Holgersson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

19 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 5%
Around 20 hours/week»12 63%
Around 25 hours/week»4 21%
Around 30 hours/week»1 5%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- many more during exam preparation» (Around 20 hours/week)
- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

19 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 10%
50%»2 10%
75%»10 52%
100%»5 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.94

- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (50%)
- I was about 10 days late for the course registration at the beginning.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

19 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 15%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 5%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»8 42%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 36%

Genomsnitt: 3

- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (The goals are difficult to understand)
- There were like ten goals, hardly remember them. » (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 81%
No, the goals are set too high»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.18

- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

16 svarande

No, not at all»1 6%
To some extent»7 43%
Yes, definitely»8 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.43

- The examination is very difficult, but the problem is that it is corrected very bad.» (No, not at all)
- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»8 42%
Large extent»8 42%
Great extent»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»9 47%
Large extent»7 36%
Great extent»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.68

- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Large extent)
- Still, the book is 1995. Very old, it seems to be that it should be really changed.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

19 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»12 63%
Very well»6 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

- Veri confusionary.» (Rather badly)
- Kramer"s article/paper should have been uploaded» (Rather well)
- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

19 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»9 47%
Very good»8 42%
I did not seek help»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

19 svarande

Very poorly»1 5%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»9 47%
Very well»9 47%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- They seemed more interested in attacking me rather than anything else. Our opposition in the groupwork did throw bombs against us, almost insulting us. The professor should have said something.» (Very poorly)
- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»10 52%
High»6 31%
Too high»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.47

- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Low)
- Adequate to high - perhaps should you have been able to gain some more extra credits from the case. » (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»13 68%
High»5 26%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Low)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

19 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Average»6 31%
Good»10 52%
Very good»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Good)
- i thought the topic was a bit boring for my liking, but i somewhat new that when selecting the course. nonetheless, i think it can be very useful for my professional future to have read it.» (Good)
- It is good because it is interesting. But the book must be changed, it is old. I am also satisfied with the teachers - all of them.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The mid-term exam should be preserved, which helps me to study through all the concepts have been taught.»
- the groupwork, maybe worth more points and with some more help as indicated in class »
- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/»
- Keep the course demanding. »
- All the exercises on ceiling/floor price, valuation, etc...»
- case work tom ewing»
- The course itself.»
- Group work»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More about copyright (related to software dev)»
- The bonus points system. As some student get 80% correct of the mid-term exam, but only be rewarded 4 bonus points out of 10, which is very unfair.»
- i think the book was excellent some years ago, but it should now be updated with some fresh content.»
- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/»
- Course group project. Too high workload and not clear instructions. Hard to apply theoretical frameworks due to companies do not like to share sensitive information about their IP strategies»
- A bit more focused on real world cases, in class, where strategic options and difficulties are discussed.»
- Incorporate a few more in class exercises. Move the deadline for the exam to two weeks before the exam, that would likely solve all problems with students complaining over the case workload. »
- Too workload for the report, and few opportunities to contact Swedish companies if you are an exchange student»
- frank tietze"s involvement in the course seemed to be somewhat pointless, i.e. he did not any value. case supervision could have easily be done by ove or marcus»
- The book. And the groupwork. Only 10 extrapoints? Too low.»
- Less workload and a more reasonable (greater) influence on the final grading regarding the group project»

16. Additional comments

- For personal experience I think that a collection of papers and official documents could be a valuable substitute for a textbook in general. »
- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/»
- Exam contained too many questions requiring much time to answer. Time and question number ratio is not good.»
- A critical aspect: people without a previous knowledge on IP or economics find extremely difficult to understand some concepts, and (less than) two months of study is not enough, so either have the IP part at the beginning or focus more on the basic concepts»

Specific questions for this course

17. How would you assess the quality of Ove Granstrand"s lectures?

19 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Average»4 23%
Good»9 52%
Very Good»4 23%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 4

- Ove could be clearer when talking!» (Average)
- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Average)
- Very good structuring of the lectures and (obviously) deep experience on the subject, however many students were at level 0 with the IP concepts and the lectures could not be easily followed by everyone» (Average)
- took some getting used to have lectures without slides. still, ove"s lectures were very structured and easy to follow» (Good)
- I liked Ove. » (Good)

18. How would you assess the quality of Tom Ewing"s lectures?

19 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Average»3 17%
Good»11 64%
Very Good»3 17%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 4

- Should work on the tone of his voice (too monotone), interesting subject but I fell asleep» (Average)
- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Average)
- some of his writing on the board was too small to read! he could try to be a bit more energetic» (Good)
- Tom is a very good professor.» (Good)
- Tom does a very good job and is very interesting to listen to. He made the LAW-segment one of the most interesting in the course. » (Very Good)

19. How would you assess the quality of Marcus Holgersson"s lectures and exercises?

19 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Average»2 11%
Good»9 52%
Very Good»6 35%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 4.23

- The lecture was good but the counting example was hard eventhough it shouldn"t be, something must have been wrong but I don"t know what» (Average)
- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Average)
- very helpful» (Very Good)
- Marcus is a very good professor and also a very good human being always willing to help students.» (Very Good)
- I liked the interactive exercises» (No opinion)

20. How would you assess the form of examination, with an IP law exam (pass/fail + bonus points for final exam), a case (bonus points) and a final exam (graded)?

18 svarande

Very poor»1 5%
Poor»2 11%
Average»5 27%
Good»9 50%
Very good»1 5%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.38

- Too much workload for too few points.» (Poor)
- case should give real points, not only bonus» (Average)
- good for the bonus points, however the group work should count more, even if it had to give non-bonus points » (Average)
- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Average)
- Although, the points of the case was not much in relation to the amount of work we put in.» (Good)
- Don"t listen to students who want more points for the case! » (Good)
- The choice of giving bonus points, rather than subtracting points is in my (maybe biased) opinion extremely correct. Overall work load was a bit too high.» (Good)
- in hindsight it was ok. during the course i somewhat failed to see the point of this» (Good)

21. How would you assess the casework as means for your learning?

18 svarande

Very poor»2 11%
Poor»0 0%
Average»2 11%
Good»11 61%
Very good»3 16%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- I honestly think the caseworks were useless and could be scrapped from the program without anyone noticing» (Very poor)
- The host company and its innovation largely determines the usefulness of the case. » (Average)
- good, however very pretentious for the contact and too little help. » (Good)
- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Good)
- learning by doing is the best way» (Very good)
- IT gives super-useful insights.» (Very good)

22. How would you assess the final exam"s relevance in relation to the general course content as presented during the course?

19 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»2 11%
Average»6 33%
Good»10 55%
Very good»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.44

- As a 8000 words project work, only being rewarded maximum 10 bonus points, this motivates us much less to put more effort on it. As well as the mid-term exam, both of them should contribute more to the final grade.» (Poor)
- some things seemed disconnected from the course» (Average)
- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Average)
- Could have contained harder calculation assignments. » (Good)
- Maybe some parts of the book could be eliminated, but overall the exam closely follows it, so it is easy for students to prepare» (Good)

23. How would you assess the difficulty of the final exam?

19 svarande

Too easy»3 16%
Adequate»10 55%
Too hard»5 27%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.11

- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Too easy)
- too many fancy questions and it required a degree of elaboration not expected and to which we were not trained » (Adequate)
- Maybe the question with the most points should be put in the beginning, or at least it should be pointed out. Many students overlooked it and did not have enough time at the end.» (Adequate)
- not overly difficult, but very intense! there was a lot crammed into those 4 hours» (Adequate)
- I wouldn"t say "too hard", but it"s definitely not easy to prepare, and it covered all the lectures" contents, and both the guest lectures, which I don"t know those are going to be covered by the final exam, as well as the reading materials. » (Too hard)
- It is way too hard.» (Too hard)

24. How would you assess the course book?

19 svarande

Very poor»2 11%
Poor»1 5%
Average»8 47%
Good»6 35%
Very good»0 0%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 3.05

- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Very poor)
- I am sorry to say this but is an old book with some super annoying part. It has also a funny grammar and it is difficult to be read properly. Change it, please.» (Very poor)
- some good parts, but outdated and sometimes prolix » (Average)
- It is a lot of information in the book, and in some chapters it seems to have been written more as a scientific case, rather than a means to learn concepts and theories.» (Average)
- The book was too "logorrheic"» (Average)
- The Japan chapters were a bit ODD buit otherwise very good. » (Good)
- not sure how much the field has developed recently, but the course book seemed somewhat dated being written 12 years ago. perhaps a second edition?» (Good)

25. How would you assess the rest of the written course material?

19 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Average»7 46%
Good»8 53%
Very good»0 0%
No opinion»4

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- Slides: good, The rest: nice but either not useful or not fundamental» (Average)
- the case study book was not used» (Good)
- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (Good)

26. How would you assess the value of the subject in this course in general?

19 svarande

Very low»0 0%
Low»2 10%
Average»2 10%
High»8 42%
Very high»7 36%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.05

- the subjects per se were very interesting. however i think that some organisational aspects need to be improved as indicated above» (High)
- gKeVYE <a href="http://oyewqeltjvjb.com/">oyewqeltjvjb</a>, [url=http://mvlufrsxborw.com/]mvlufrsxborw[/url], [link=http://nsqzpyvghkfz.com/]nsqzpyvghkfz[/link], http://egaowcwxlgcj.com/» (High)
- High but it needs to be fixed.» (High)
- In general, I think it"s a very well organized and definitely valuable course to take and recommend to students from next year. Thank you very much!» (Very high)
- I think the role of IP is critical nowadays, I would recommend this course if the main problem (explaining the basics better) were to be solved» (Very high)
- good preparation for the future» (Very high)

Kursutvärderingssystem från