Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Global Chemical Sustainability 2012, KBT040
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-11-14 - 2012-11-23 Antal svar: 3 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 37% Kontaktperson: Magdalena Svanström»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.3 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 2 | | 66% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 1 | | 33% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.33 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 3 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 0 | | 0% |
100%» | | 3 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 5
Goals and goal fulfilmentAfter successfully completing the course, the students should be able to: •,Give an overview of the function and state of the natural systems in the world, with more detailed explanations for issues relating to chemistry and chemicals •,Explain how the human society, in particular chemical and chemical engineering industry, affects and depends on natural systems •,Describe international and regional work on environment and sustainable development on governmental and non-governmental level •,Identify appropriate tools and strategies for sustainable development in society, in particular industry •,Analyze sectors of society, in particular chemical and chemical engineering industry, and formulate appropriate strategies for sustainable development •,Describe the importance of including different stakeholders and perspectives in discussions on sustainable technology development3. How understandable are the course goals?3 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 1 | | 33% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 2 | | 66% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.3 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 3 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?3 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, definitely» | | 3 | | 100% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?3 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 100% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?3 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 66% |
Large extent» | | 1 | | 33% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.33 - Did not use the book at all. Lecture notes were enough.» (Some extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?3 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 1 | | 33% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 66% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66
Teaching and learning activities9. How useful were the lectures by Magdalena Svanström in your learning?Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Magdalena Svanström»3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 0 | | 0% |
Quite useful» | | 1 | | 33% |
Very useful» | | 2 | | 66% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 10. How useful was the lecture by Morgan Fröling in your learning?Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Morgan Fröling»3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 1 | | 100% |
Quite useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 11. How useful was the lecture by Maryam Mahmoudkhani in your learning?Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Hans Theliander»3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 1 | | 100% |
Quite useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 12. How useful was the lecture by Thomas Hjertberg in your learning?Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Thomas Hjertberg»3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 0 | | 0% |
Quite useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very useful» | | 1 | | 100% |
No opinion» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 13. How useful was the lecture by the journalist, Karl-Johan Bondesson, in your learning?3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 0 | | 0% |
Quite useful» | | 1 | | 100% |
Very useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 14. How useful was the lecture by Christer Ågren in your learning?3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 1 | | 100% |
Quite useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 15. How useful was the lecture by Rickard Arvidsson and Diego Penaloza in your learning?3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 0 | | 0% |
Quite useful» | | 1 | | 100% |
Very useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 16. How useful was the lecture by Kristin Fransson and Sandra Roos in your learning?3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 1 | | 50% |
Quite useful» | | 1 | | 50% |
Very useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 17. How useful was the lecture by Gunilla Clancy and Gustav Sandin in your learning?3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 0 | | 0% |
Quite useful» | | 1 | | 50% |
Very useful» | | 1 | | 50% |
No opinion» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 18. How useful was the lecture by Greg Peters in your learning?3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 0 | | 0% |
Quite useful» | | 1 | | 100% |
Very useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 19. How useful was the lecture by Jerker Ligthart from the Chemicals Secretariat in your learning?3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 1 | | 100% |
Quite useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 20. How useful were the class discussions on prereading material on some lectures in your learning3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 1 | | 33% |
Quite useful» | | 2 | | 66% |
Very useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 21. How useful was the exercise on "Urgent issues" in your learning?3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 0 | | 0% |
Quite useful» | | 1 | | 100% |
Very useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 22. How useful was the exercise on "Basic concepts" in your learning?3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 0 | | 0% |
Quite useful» | | 2 | | 66% |
Very useful» | | 1 | | 33% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 23. How useful was the exercise on "Multicriteria analysis" in your learning?3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 0 | | 0% |
Quite useful» | | 1 | | 33% |
Very useful» | | 2 | | 66% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 24. How useful was the Preknowledge test in your learning?3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 1 | | 33% |
Could have been better» | | 1 | | 33% |
Quite useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very useful» | | 1 | | 33% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Exercise on "basic concepts" were enough.» (Not useful at all)
25. How useful was the Al Gore Movie in your learning?3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 0 | | 0% |
Quite useful» | | 1 | | 50% |
Very useful» | | 1 | | 50% |
No opinion» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 26. How useful was the work in the big Project in your learning?3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 2 | | 66% |
Quite useful» | | 1 | | 33% |
Very useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 27. How useful was the Submission movie including the subsequent discussion on chemicals in your learning?3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 1 | | 33% |
Quite useful» | | 1 | | 33% |
Very useful» | | 1 | | 33% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 28. How useful was the Museum Visit in your learning?3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 1 | | 50% |
Could have been better» | | 1 | | 50% |
Quite useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 1.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 29. How useful was the Sustainability Seminar in your learning?3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 0 | | 0% |
Quite useful» | | 1 | | 50% |
Very useful» | | 1 | | 50% |
No opinion» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 30. How useful were the Stakeholder analysis and dialogue exercises in your learning?3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 0 | | 0% |
Quite useful» | | 1 | | 33% |
Very useful» | | 2 | | 66% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 31. How useful was the individual Bonus activity in your learning?3 svarande
Not useful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Could have been better» | | 0 | | 0% |
Quite useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very useful» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 3 | | |
Genomsnitt: 0 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.95
Study climate32. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?3 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 100% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 33. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?3 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very well» | | 3 | | 100% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 34. How was the course workload?3 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 33% |
High» | | 2 | | 66% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 35. How was the total workload this study period?3 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
High» | | 2 | | 66% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4.33
Summarizing questions36. What is your general impression of the course?3 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 3 | | 100% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 37. Do you think that the examination form with the bonus system in this course is good?3 svarande
No, this should be changed» | | 0 | | 0% |
It can be improved» | | 1 | | 33% |
The system is OK» | | 1 | | 33% |
The system is excellent» | | 1 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 38. Did the course improve your ability to shift perspectives?In the course introduction, it was explained that the diversity among the students was to be used in different exercises in order to improve your ability to understand different perspectives related to time, geographical conditions, cultures and disciplines.3 svarande
No, it did not!» | | 0 | | 0% |
To a minor extent it did» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, in some ways» | | 2 | | 66% |
Yes, it absolutely did!» | | 1 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 39. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- THE SUSTAINABILITY SEMINAR AND THE STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS »
40. What should definitely be changed to next year?- HAVE ONE ACTIVITY PER TOPIC (WATER POLLUTION, AIR POLLUTION... AND SO ON)»
41. Additional commentsGenomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.16
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.97 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.65
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|