ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPAEM - MTT090 Polymer processing and properties

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-11-14 - 2012-11-23
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 27%
Kontaktperson: Johan Bankel»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 4 36%

Around 20 hours/week» 4 36%

Around 25 hours/week» 3 27%

Around 30 hours/week» 0 0%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 0 0%

75%» 2 18%

100%» 9 81%

Genomsnitt: 4.81

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 1 9%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 1 9%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 9 81%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 10 100%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 1 10%

Yes, definitely» 8 80%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 2 18%

Large extent» 7 63%

Great extent» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent» 1 9%

Some extent» 1 9%

Large extent» 8 72%

Great extent» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 0 0%

Rather well» 8 72%

Very well» 3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- Det är bra om filer läggs upp så tidigt som möjligt så att man kan komma förberedd till föreläsningarna» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 4 36%

Very good» 6 54%

I did not seek help» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 5 45%

Very well» 6 54%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

11. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 10%

Adequate» 8 80%

High» 1 10%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 10 90%

High» 1 9%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 1 9%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 9 81%

Excellent» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.9 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Jag förväntade mig att det skulle handla t.ex om uhr polymerer är uppbyggda och mer om det kemiska inom polymervetenskap. Men det togs upp under kursens första vecka och förväntades mer vara förkunskapskrav. Själva kursen var ju en ren mekanik-kurs. Som i sig var rätt bra, men inte efter mina förväntningar.» (Fair)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The lectures is very good, it is easy to be alert at the lectures when we need to take notes in comparison to power points.»
- yield stress»
- Det låga tempot, så att man hinner förstå allt. Det är bättre att ha flera föreläsningar med inte så mycket innehåll än att ha få föreläsningar där massa saker ska pressas in.»
- TTS and the presentation»
- The problem solving part»
- lectures were good!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The labb sessions need to be more "active". Now it was just a review and then they mailed all results so we could write a report on the review with results.»
- injection moulding»
- Labbarna var inte så roliga. Vi satt ju bara och lyssnade på vad lab-instruktören gjorde. Det kunde lika gärna föreläsaren gått igenom på svarta tavlan...»
- clearer outcome of the guest lecturer... what is of special importance?»
- Some experiments, which can be be carried out in person, not just watching, short feedback about the TTS would be nice»
- There should be more of practical work ...to make student understand the molecular changes taking place in polymer...to make them understand in a better way »
- more practical labs, not just watching!»

16. Additional comments

- the course has been a good one»
- Är nöjd. Det kändes skönt att för en gångs skull inte vara nervös inför att få tentaresultatet.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.9

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.9
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.72

Kursutvärderingssystem från