Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPAEM - MMK232 Metals engineering A, Tentamen

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-11-14 - 2012-11-23
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 18%
Kontaktperson: Johan Bankel»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 22%
Around 20 hours/week»4 44%
Around 25 hours/week»2 22%
Around 30 hours/week»1 11%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

- Had already taken the course (re-exam)» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»1 11%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 11%
75%»4 44%
100%»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

- i was not able to listen» (50%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 11%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 66%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 12%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 87%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

- i have a material background and sometimes feel like repetition of my bachelor studies...so there should be something more into research » (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 25%
Yes, definitely»6 75%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»1 11%
Some extent»7 77%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

- Remember some from when I took the course. » (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»2 22%
Some extent»1 11%
Large extent»6 66%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 11%
Rather well»5 55%
Very well»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- The system with the handouts could be bether» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»6 66%
Very good»2 22%
I did not seek help»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

- Poor communication between lecturer and assistances about the heat treatment lab» (Rather good)
- Asked some questions through e-mail. Fast response.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 11%
Rather well»3 33%
Very well»4 44%
I did not seek cooperation»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- The group project was in too large groups.» (Rather poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»8 88%
High»1 11%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

12. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low»1 11%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 66%
High»2 22%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 22%
Adequate»3 33%
Good»4 44%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.22 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Heat treatment project»
- things which are taught dis year ...form the basic for many student who have background other than material , so all the stuff should be there.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Didn’,t learn so much from the microscopy lab. The simulation lan fellt pointlss»
- The lectures need to be more activated and that means that it was to much powerpoint with "essays" on each slide.»
- problem solving, student must interact more, they must try to answer to their own and some more illustrations and documemts should be shown to them»
- Heat treatment lab should be carried out after consulting with the lecturer, the assistances who lead the lab didn"t know some of the answers themselves»
- few more.....topic which are in the field of advanced material should be included»
- better comunication between theacher and labteachers specially in the heat treatment lab. the labs in general were not so good, more practical labs!»

16. Additional comments

- The lecture slides were very difficult to understand.»
- Course evaluation with the representatives did not take place at the end of the course, but is important»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.22

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.22
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.55

Kursutvärderingssystem från