Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
SP1 12_13 Extra Questions for Environmental impact assessment
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-11-09 - 2012-11-15 Antal svar: 11 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?% Kontaktperson: Christina Larsson»
1. How would you rate the lectures?11 svarande
Very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 7 | | 63% |
Rather poor» | | 3 | | 27% |
Poor» | | 1 | | 9% |
Genomsnitt: 2.45 - Though the lectures were generally good when talking about the contents, they were hard to follow due to the pace being too slow and they often wandered too far from the subject.» (Rather good)
2. How would you rate the five exercises?11 svarande
Very good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 6 | | 54% |
Rather poor» | | 4 | | 36% |
Poor» | | 1 | | 9% |
Genomsnitt: 2.54 - I understood the point with them but maybe the subjects would be updated e.g. Leopold matrix which I understood is used that much anymore» (Rather good)
3. How would you rate the three literature seminars?11 svarande
Very good» | | 5 | | 45% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 18% |
Rather poor» | | 4 | | 36% |
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.9 - Many unrelated questions, which is a waste of time i guess. But if maybe the questions were designed beforehand the learning outcome would be grater for me. » (Rather poor)
- lack of structure and that it wasen"t monitoring to go to the seminar lectures.» (Rather poor)
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|