ENKÄTER

 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.


BOM-Road engineering 2012, VMT060

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-11-01 - 2012-11-20
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 23%
Kontaktperson: Björn Engström»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp


Learning outcomes and examination

Before you answer these questions, please check in the course syllabus what is stated about learning outcomes of the course.

1. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- more focus on the stormwater design would be useful as well!» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

2. To what extent have you reached the learning outcomes?

10 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»1 10%
40-60%»2 20%
60-80%»3 30%
80-100%»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 4

3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

Please consider all kinds of examiantions during the course: assignments, projects, seminars, final written exam, etc.

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 60%
Yes, definitely»3 30%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.5


Teaching and learning

4. To what extent has the organised teaching activities been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»4 40%
Large extent»4 40%
Great extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

5. To what extent has the teaching material and the course home page been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»3 30%
Large extent»5 50%
Great extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- very messy home page - and badly organised and scanned information» (Small extent)
- Some kind of course compendium would have been great!» (Some extent)

6. How were the opportunities to get feedback and for asking questions and getting help from teachers and supervisors?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 10%
Rather good»1 10%
Very good»8 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.7


Course organisation

7. How well did the course organisation, course information, course home page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 20%
Rather well»3 30%
Very well»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- last minute assignments and information - clear early information at start of course would be good» (Rather badly)


Study climate

8. To what extent have the facilties at Chalmers been appropriate to support your studies in this course, e.g. lecture halls, study rooms, equipment, computer labs etc.

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 30%
Large extent»4 40%
Great extent»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Very few study rooms during exam week» (Some extent)

9. How much of your available time for studies in this study period did you spend on this course?

It is assumed that 50% of the time in one quarter is used for a course of 7,5 credit units.

9 svarande

less than 20%»0 0%
20-40%»2 22%
about 50%»6 66%
60-80%»1 11%
more than 80%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

10. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 10%
Adequate»9 90%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9


Summarising questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 20%
Adequate»1 10%
Good»6 60%
Excellent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

12. What is the remaining value of the course in the future

8 svarande

Very small»0 0%
Rather small»1 12%
Neutral»4 50%
Rahter high»3 37%
Very high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

13. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- some assignments, especially no 2»
- the assignments and study visits»

14. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the ronet assignment»
- Better course literature»


Kursutvärderingssystem från