Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

BOM-Materials performance 2012, BOM065

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-11-01 - 2012-11-20
Antal svar: 30
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 42%
Kontaktperson: Björn Engström»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Väg- och vattenbyggnad 300 hp

Learning outcomes and examination

Before you answer these questions, please check in the course syllabus what is stated about learning outcomes of the course.

1. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

30 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 3%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»28 93%
No, the goals are set too high»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2

- a bit low, but ok.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- Haven"t read the goals » (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

2. To what extent have you reached the learning outcomes?

30 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»1 3%
40-60%»3 10%
60-80%»13 43%
80-100%»13 43%

Genomsnitt: 4.26

- Haven"t read the goals » (40-60%)
- Timber Masonry» (60-80%)
- I think it was ok. Of course it depends which part is more interesting for me e.g. timber part could be consider as interesting and applicable to practice, so you learn it with joy.» (60-80%)
- Laboratory 1 guidelines» (80-100%)

3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

Please consider all kinds of examiantions during the course: assignments, projects, seminars, final written exam, etc.

30 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»15 50%
Yes, definitely»15 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- To be honest, the 2nd assignment was a bit complicated to carry out. Many of us just ripped off a hand in from a last year student.» (To some extent)
- Haven"t read the goals Hat happened with some of the chapters the students presented for the class? Fibres?» (To some extent)
- I think that multiple choice test has sometimes very random questions asking in not so important things (I could really answer well questions about timber because it was concerning on important topics.)» (To some extent)

Teaching and learning

4. To what extent has the organised teaching activities been of help for your learning?

30 svarande

Small extent»1 3%
Some extent»13 43%
Large extent»13 43%
Great extent»3 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- Some lectures really good and interesting. Many is really boring and held by somebody who seems to not care about the subject at all. » (Some extent)
- I had a very hard time focusing on the 4 hours long lectures. Would have appreciated to get the questions earlier in the course to be able to study the content in a easy way by myself. The lab was fun though" » (Some extent)

5. To what extent has the teaching material and the course home page been of help for your learning?

30 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»7 23%
Large extent»16 53%
Great extent»7 23%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Assignments good!» (Some extent)

6. How were the opportunities to get feedback and for asking questions and getting help from teachers and supervisors?

30 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»3 10%
Rather good»16 53%
Very good»11 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

Course organisation

7. How well did the course organisation, course information, course home page, handouts etc work?

30 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 3%
Rather well»17 56%
Very well»12 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- home page=very good project organisation=poor» (Rather badly)
- Put up all slides before The lectures, and this should be done by all The different lecturers!» (Rather well)

Study climate

8. To what extent have the facilties at Chalmers been appropriate to support your studies in this course, e.g. lecture halls, study rooms, equipment, computer labs etc.

30 svarande

Small extent»3 10%
Some extent»9 30%
Large extent»12 40%
Great extent»6 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

- It´,s always difficult to find a good place to study. Too few small group rooms at V department.» (Small extent)
- More computer rooms needed. Book rooms for group project.» (Some extent)
- More study rooms are needed» (Some extent)
- Too small lecture hall, people were sitting in the stairs..» (Some extent)
- It is hard to get hold of computers. The lecture hall VK has a very bad fan in the right back of the room - makes it sometimes hard to hear what you are saying!» (Some extent)
- Computers are incredible slow in the V-building"s computer rooms. You just can"t open a simple PDF-file with them.» (Large extent)
- I ve already complained at impossibility to control very powerful ventilation in group rooms.» (Great extent)

9. How much of your available time for studies in this study period did you spend on this course?

It is assumed that 50% of the time in one quarter is used for a course of 7,5 credit units.

30 svarande

less than 20%»1 3%
20-40%»9 30%
about 50%»12 40%
60-80%»6 20%
more than 80%»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.96

- About 40%» (20-40%)
- more to 40 than to 20, sometimes it quite difficult to say because there was more learning for final exam and on the other hand more work for Structural course so I think it was an intention to divide it like this.» (20-40%)
- About 50%, but put in a lot more time than for a regular cours of 7.5 hp» (about 50%)

10. How was the course workload?

30 svarande

Too low»1 3%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»14 46%
High»13 43%
Too high»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Is this really masters level? Multiple choise questions? seriously?!» (Too low)
- I like that there was small assignments and lab reports during the whole course, even though I thought it was a bit too less time for self studies. Again, the availability of the questions would have helped me get out more of my time. I did not learn much during the lessons unfortunately.» (Adequate)
- So many smaller tasks (lab report, assignment, presentations) makes it a bit stressful. Make the assignment greater and the number of them less.» (Too high)

Summarising questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

30 svarande

Poor»1 3%
Fair»4 13%
Adequate»8 26%
Good»13 43%
Excellent»4 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

12. What is the remaining value of the course in the future

30 svarande

Very small»0 0%
Rather small»1 3%
Neutral»10 33%
Rahter high»17 56%
Very high»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

13. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- duggas»
- All»
- The tests and project work.»
- Arezo was very good!»
- Labs, assignments.»
- Laborations. »
- Fler studiebesök så att man kan se praktiken. Teori är grunden men om man inte kan se hur en detaljanslutning sker i praktiken, så tycker jag att det blir svårt att koppla teori med verklighet»
- There are a lot of assignments and hand-ins. The amount of mandatory tasks can be a little "irritating" but afterwards i felt they were essential for learning the course.»
- Concrete mixing!!»
- Variety of lecturers, content»
- Duggorna»
- The course is rather well organized, I don"t think there is something to do to improve it. »
- labs and timber part»
- Study trip»

14. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the project»
- Increase the timber part and start teaching masonry!»
- Make the course lasts for one semester, not one quarter, so students can have more time to digest and understand the course well.»
- Project vert general.»
- The number of tasks should be reduced.»
- Better communication between different teachers and the other course Too much is repeted in the lectures. Also the course is too similar to course in the basic program (Väg och vatten åk. 2) I can"t see why this course needs to be compulsory. I think it has been a waist of time. »
- The wood handin and presentation of the first chapter»
- Multiple choice questions in the duggas and the test exam are very similar to those in te test. Maybe it gets to easy to memorise some answers whitout understanding why»
- The "exam guards" definitely must know the special rules for the 1 hour tests. The first exam made me amazingly stressed and upset only because of the lady in the room! Give us the questions earlier! Some people had earlier years tests available. That made it unfair for us who did not. Because of this, and the impossibility of hindrance people from charging them, everyone should be allowed to see example questions in beforehand. This is the reason to that some people had 8-9 point and some only 4-5 in the first test.»
- It is rather hard to understand the english pronounciation of the teachers during the lectures, mainly Bengt and Tang, dont know what could be done to change this tough. »
- The amount of assignments, laboratory hand-ins and the work loar over all»
- Maybe just give more time to assignments and project. »
- i thing that the seminars concerning in chemistry were sometimes a little bit boring because of not so interesting content but generally OK.»
- No idea.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från