Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Internal Combustion Engines 2012, MTF240

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-11-01 - 2012-11-20
Antal svar: 24
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 33%
Kontaktperson: Sven Andersson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e. knowledge, skills and attitueds to be acquired by the student during the course.

1. How understandable are the course goals?

24 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals ar difficult to understand»1 4%
The goals give som guidance but could be clearer»6 25%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»17 70%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- They could be defined in terms of highlighting the activities which will be carried out in the introduction session.» (The goals give som guidance but could be clearer)

2. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

24 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yies, teh goals seem reasonable»24 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Yes, according to my background, the goals seemed to be marginally high, but since we are studying a Masters program, they seem reasonable.» (Yies, teh goals seem reasonable)

3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

24 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To som extent»9 37%
Yes, definitely»15 62%
I have not been examined yet»0

Genomsnitt: 2.62

- It was rather difficult» (To som extent)
- However, I think it assessed more than the goals, or actually the studying we had to do was too extensive.» (Yes, definitely)
- Yes, the examination procedure was perfect.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

4. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

24 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 12%
Large extent»14 58%
Great extent»7 29%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- For me, the system of teaching was completely different compared to my home university. It was more of practical applications to theoretical points of view which made me learn to a great extent !» (Large extent)

5. What do you think about the different lecturers/teachers?


- Jonas needs to be more interactive and not very monotonous. »

Sven Andersson
24 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»0 0%
Good»1 4%
Excellent»23 95%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.95

Arjan Helmantel
24 svarande

Very poor»1 5%
Poor»3 16%
OK»8 44%
Good»5 27%
Excellent»1 5%
No opinion»6

Genomsnitt: 3.11

Lars Christian Riis Johansen
24 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»2 8%
Good»16 66%
Excellent»6 25%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.16

Zachary Falgout
24 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»3 12%
OK»8 33%
Good»12 50%
Excellent»1 4%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.45

Jonas Wärnberg
24 svarande

Very poor»1 5%
Poor»6 30%
OK»6 30%
Good»6 30%
Excellent»1 5%
No opinion»4

Genomsnitt: 3

Lucien Koopmans
24 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»4 16%
Good»4 16%
Excellent»16 66%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.5

6. What do you think about the disassembly lab / assignments?


- Assignment 2 was a bit hard to understand»
- Both the assignments give a very good insight about the principles intended.»
- In assignment 1 some question were not clear. for instance, when the new point on the load map had to be chosen, I understood that the point should be for the engine speed corresponding to the speed for the mechanical transmission, some just picked the optimum bsfc.»
- More help with Matlab would be good, also a booked computer room.»

23 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»3 13%
Good»6 27%
Excellent»13 59%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 4.45

Assignment 1 (load map)
24 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»3 12%
Good»12 50%
Excellent»9 37%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.25

Assignment 2 (heat release)
24 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»2 8%
OK»11 45%
Good»8 33%
Excellent»3 12%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.5

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

24 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»17 70%
Great extent»7 29%

Genomsnitt: 3.29

- Heywood is a good prescribed book ! Also, the lecture slides are of a great help.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

24 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 4%
Rather well»15 62%
Very well»8 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.29

- Would have been good to have the reading advice from the beginning.» (Rather well)
- Student Portal was very organised.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the oppurtunities för asking questions and getting help?

24 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»8 34%
Very good»15 65%
I did not seek help»1

Genomsnitt: 3.65

- everyone encouraged asking questions, even the replies to the e-mails were quick.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

24 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»11 47%
Very well»12 52%
I did not seek cooperation»1

Genomsnitt: 3.52

- The students have been very co-operative throughout the course.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

24 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»14 58%
High»9 37%
Too high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- i would say it might be high in some pockets of the course, but on an average it was adequate. It was perfect for the course.» (Adequate)
- It was high some weeks and a adequate other weeks. I think that was really good.» (High)

12. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

24 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 16%
Around 20 hours/week»3 12%
Around 25 hours/week»12 50%
Around 30 hours/week»5 20%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- Less in the beginning and full working time the last few weeks.» (Around 25 hours/week)
- I hope this question includes the number of hours of lectures. » (Around 25 hours/week)

13. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

23 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»6 26%
100%»17 73%

Genomsnitt: 4.73

- I missed one lecture( Engine Control), was from 8.00 and I overslept.» (?)

14. How was the total workload this study period?

23 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»11 47%
High»11 47%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

- I think it was pretty adequate concerning the extra curricular activities and get together events the students were active in.» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

24 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 4%
Good»14 58%
Excellent»9 37%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Sven and Lucien. The engine disassembly. The book was also good.»
- I really liked the lecturer (Sven). He was making jokes in the lecture as well which were like ice-breaking between lecturer and students. I really liked the attitude to the students.»
- The integrity, the teaching methodology, the procedure of midterm.»
- Sven Andersson,the Disassembly and the both assignments. But on the first assignment, some part of it should be rephrased, it was not so clear. »
- Sven! And the assignments as well as the exam format. »
- Load map assignment, Disassembly»
- The disassembly and the Lucien Koopmans lectures»
- I think most of it should be the same! The engine disassembly was really good for understanding.»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Reading advice from the beginning and some measures to encourage the students to read the related chapters each week. Too much to study for the exam. Maybe some less important parts could be excluded. The calculation part could be a separate course, with separate study points. It could be optional for students not continuing with the advanced course.»
- The deadlines of the assignments were almost at the same time. There should be a bigger gap between them.»
- The problem solving sessions could be more organised and given more time so that students get help for more bonus points during mid term. »
- Mer feedback och förklaringar på ass 2»
- Possible introduction and experimentation with a dyno for better understanding of fundamentatals and some testing experience.»
- The lecture about OBD was quite boring because there wwere too much regulation and rules.»
- Not much. »
- The lecture about enginecontrol should get better.»

18. Additional comments

- Instead of a final exam, I would have liked a small assignment (or a small test) each week. I would have like a "light" version of this course, not requiring as much work (but giving less study points).»
- Thank You for making acquainted with IC Engine Fundamentals, Heywood»

Kursutvärderingssystem från